Los gestos y la enseñanza de palabras poco familiares: ¿Cuándo emplean las maestras información gestual?

Authors

  • Alejandra Beatriz Menti Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Lenguas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET),Argentina
  • Florencia Alam Universidad de Buenos Aire y Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the gestures that teachers employ in the treatment of unknown words in science classes in the primary school. The corpus consists of interactional sequences (Goodwin & Heritage, 1990; Schegloff, 1990) coming from 12 teaching situations video-recorded in 1st, 3rd and 5th grade of 4 schools, 2 in rural zones and 2 in urban zones, located in the Province of Córdoba, Argentina. In the interactional sequences the teachers used words that were unfamiliar for the children. A qualitative analysis was carried out (Strauss & Corbin, 1991) that allowed us to compare the sequences in which the teachers explain, define or repair each of the selected unfamiliar words. Results show that, different from other reported studies, teachers' use of gestures is not only associated with the unfamiliar term employed but in response to the children's verbal and/or gestual actions indicating a possible lack of conceptual understanding.

Keywords

gestures, interactional sequence, language learning, language teaching

References

Alam, F.; Stein, A. & Rosemberg, C.R. (2011). “Te explico qué quiere decir”, “te digo cómo se llama”. Interacciones niño a niño en torno al vocabulario no familiar. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 4(4), 59-71.

Beals, D.E. (1997). Sources of support for learning words in conversation: evidence from mealtimes. Journal Child Language, 24(3), 673-694. doi:10.1017/S0305000997003267

Crowder, E. M. & Newman, D. (1993). Telling what they know: The role of gesture and language in children’s science explanations. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1(2), 341-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.1.2.06cro

Gaythwaite, E.S. (2005). Didn't you see what I meant? Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 7(1/2), 97-108.

Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 720-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.4.720

Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society,18(1), 53-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457

Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual review of anthropology, 19, 238-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.19.1.283

Green, J. Weade, R. & Graham, K. (1988). Lesson construction and student participation: A sociolinguistic analysis. In J. Green & J.O. Harke (Eds), Multiple perspective analysis of classroom discourse (pp. 11- 47). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834

Lemke, J. L. (1999). Typological and Topological Meaning in Diagnostic Discourse. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 173-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545057

Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33, 703-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504045038

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001

McWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1985). The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271- 296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900006449

Menti, A. & Rosemberg, C.R. (2009, Abril). La conversación en el aula: Oportunidades para el aprendizaje de vocabulario. En Carranza, I. (Comp), Actas del IV Coloquio de Investigadores en Estudios del Discurso y I Jornadas Internacionales de Discurso e Interdisciplina (pp. 995-1002). Córdoba: Facultad de Lenguas.

Menti, A. & Rosemberg, C.R. (2011). La enseñanza del vocabulario en las clases de ciencias: Análisis de los movimientos conversacionales de las docentes. Lenguaje, 39(1), 93-112.

Menti, A. & Rosemberg, C.R. (enviado). Oportunidades para el aprendizaje de vocabulario en las situaciones de enseñanza de ciencia sociales en la escuela primaria. Un estudio del vocabulario al que se hallan expuestos los niños. Interdisciplinaria.

Migdalek, M.J., & Rosemberg, C.R. (2012). El uso de los gestos en el discurso docente durante la planificación del juego en el jardín de infantes. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature,5(3), 25-43.

Mondada, L. (2001). Por una lingüística interaccional. Discurso y Sociedad, 3(3), 61-89.

Nelson, K. (2007). Young Minds in Social Worlds. Experience, Meaning and Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rosemberg, C.R. & Silva, M.L. (2009). Teacher–Children Interaction and Concept Development in Kindergarten. Discourse Processes, 46(6), 572- 591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959588

Rosemberg, C.R., & Stein, A. (2009). Vocabulario y alfabetización temprana. Un estudio del entorno lingüístico en hogares de poblaciones urbano-marginadas. En M.C. Richaud & J.E. Moreno (Eds), Investigación en Ciencias del Comportamiento (pp. 517-541). Buenos Aires: Ediciones CIIPME-CONICET.

Roth, W.M. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(11), 1683-1714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00115-0

Roth, W.M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71, 365-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003365

Sacks, H. Schegloff, E. A. y G. Jefferson (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language,50, 696-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243

Schegloff, E.A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of coherence in talk-in-inter- action. In B. Dorval (Ed), Conversational Organization and its Development (pp. 51-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Schegloff, E.A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defence on intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97, 1295-1345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/229903

Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.E. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/413107

Singer, M.A. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teacher’s gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00786.x

Snow, C.E. (1972). Mothers' speech to children learning language. Child Development, 43, 539-565.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1991). Basics of cualitative research. Grounded theory. Procedures and technics. Londres: Sage Publications.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Unamuno, V. (2008). Multilingual switch in peer classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 19, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.01.002

Weizman, Z.O. & Snow, C.E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 265-279.

Author Biographies

Alejandra Beatriz Menti, Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Lenguas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET),Argentina

Profesora Asistente de la Facultad de Lenguas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Argentina

Becaria Postdoctoral del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET),Argentina

Florencia Alam, Universidad de Buenos Aire y Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

Florencia Alam es Licenciada en Letras por la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Realizó una maestría en Análisis del Discurso. Actualmente se encuentra finalizando su Doctorado en Educación en la Universidad de Buenos Aires con una beca doctoral del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET-Argentina

Published

2014-02-27

How to Cite

Menti, A. B., & Alam, F. (2014). Los gestos y la enseñanza de palabras poco familiares: ¿Cuándo emplean las maestras información gestual?. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 7(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.510

Downloads