Participant profiles in LMOOCs: a literature review and case study

Authors

Abstract

Language learning through massive open online courses (LMOOCs) have distinctive features from the rest of online formative proposals. The courses currently working have assessment criteria closer to traditional methodologies, where success is associated with course completion, which leads to a concern about the massive format itself, as high completion levels are not achieved. They also offer assessment tasks not promoting the real practice of the language. Throughout the study of socio-economic and online behavioral profiles it is noticed that participants are not engaged with the course, but they are active during the time they stay on it. The results imply that the acquisition of a broader knowledge about participants that reflects if they achieve their learning goals is needed and, so that, permit a possible dissociation between success and completion. Moreover, alternatives for a content design prioritizing the practice of the target language are suggested.

Keywords

Language learning, MOOC, Behaviour profiles, Demographic profiles, Formative success

References

Anderson, A.; Huttenlocher, D.; Kleinberg, J. y Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (WWW ´14). Nueva York. Association for Computing Machinery, 687-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568042

Atenas, J. (2015). Modelo de democratización de los contenidos albergados en los MOOC. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1). pp. 3-14. Recuperado de: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/149557/

Bárcena, E., Read, T., Martin-Monje, E., y Castrillo, M. D. (2014). Analysing student participation in Foreign Language MOOCs: a case study. In EMOOCs 2014: European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit (pp. 11–17 “Professional English”).

Beaven, T., Codreanu, T. y Creuzé, A. (2014). Motivation in a language MOOC: issues for course designers. In: Martín-Monje, Elena and Bárcena, Elena eds. Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries. Berlin: De Gruyter Open, pp. 48–66.

Castrillo, M.D. (2014). 5 Language Teaching in MOOCs: the Integral Role of the Instructor. In Language MOOCs (pp. 67-90). Sciendo Migration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.5

Castrillo, M.D.; Martín-Monje, E. y Vázquez-Cano, E. Guía práctica para el diseño y tutorización de MOOC. Madrid. Telefónica Educación Digital. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324390717_Guia_practica_para_el_diseno_y_tutorizacion_de_MOOC

Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2017). The role of MOOCs in the learning of languages: Lessons from a Beginners’ English Course. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (28), 23-35. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/54001

Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2014). Massive online open courses and language learning: the case for a beginners’ English course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 242-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.042

Chacón-Beltrán, R., y Lawley, J. (2014). El aprendizaje de idiomas mediante MOOCs: la experiencia del curso Empieza con el inglés en Miríada X y UNED-COMA. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307855847_El_aprendizaje_de_idiomas_mediante_MOOCs_la_experiencia_del_curso_Empieza_con_el_ingles_en_Miriada_X_y_UNED-COMA

Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., y Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964

Cormier, D. y Siemens, G. (2010). The Open Course: Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement. Educause Review. Recuperado de: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2010/8/through-the-open-door-open-courses-as-research-learning-and-engagement

Daniel, J.; Vázquez-Cano, E. y Gisbert, M. (2015). El futuro de los MOOC: ¿aprendizaje adaptativo o modelo de negocio? RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12, 64-73.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2475

Gafaro, B. (2020). MOOCs in the Language Classroom: Using MOOCs as Complementary Materials to Support Self-Regulated Language Learning. In Recent Tools for Computer-and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning. 194-211. IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1097-1.ch009

Glance, D. G., Forsey, M., y Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First monday. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i5.4350

Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCS. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5–15. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10125/44377

Kizilcec, R., Piech, C., y Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 170-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330

Knox, J. (2014) Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC, Distance Education, 35:2, 164-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704

Martín-Monje, E., Bárcena, E., y Read, T. (2014). Peer-to-peer interaction and linguistic feedback in foreign language MOOCS. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 18(1), 167-183. Recuperado de: http://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev181ART10.pdf

Martín-Monje, E. y Bárcena, E. (Eds.). (2015). Language MOOCs: providing learning, transcending boundaries. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Martín-Monje, E., Castrillo, M. D., y Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2018). Understanding online interaction in language MOOCs through learning analytics. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 251-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1378237

Martín-Monje, E. (2019). Capítulo 4 La creación de recursos educativos abiertos y MOOC en lenguas extranjeras. Tecnologías Integradas en la Didáctica de Lenguas Extranjeras (TIDLE), 35.

Ozan, O., Ozarslan, Y. y Yıldız, H. (2018). LMOOC Design and Development Process for an Agglutinative Language: "Türkçe Öğreniyorum" Case. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2. 140-149. Recuperado de: https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings18/2018i/18_15.pdf

Richards, J. C. y Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., y Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57-69. Recuperado de: https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol10_No1.htm

Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective Language MOOC. En E.Martín- Monje y E. Bárcena, (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing Learning,Transcending Boundaries.16-32.Berlin: De Gruyter Open. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.2

Talaván, N. (2010). Claves para comprender la destreza de la comprensión oral en lengua extranjera. Epos: Revista de Filología, 26, 195-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/epos.26.2010.10643

Türkay, S.; Eidelman, H; Rosen, Y.; Seaton, D.; López, G. y Whitehill, J. (2017). Getting to know English language learners in MOOCs: their motivations, behaviours, and outcomes. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning and Scale (L@S ´17). Association For Computing Machinery. Nueva York. 209-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3053987

Vázquez-Cano, E., López-Meneses, E., y Barroso-Osuna, J. (2016). El futuro de los MOOC. Retos de la formación on-line, masiva y abierta. Educatio Siglo XXI, 34(1), 245- 247.

Veletsianos, G.; Collier, A. y Schneider, E. (2015). Digging Deeper into Learners’ Experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, Notetaking, and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology. 46. 570-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12297

Yousef, A., Chatti, M., Schroeder, U. y Wosnitza, Y. (2014). What Drives a Successful MOOC? An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOCs. IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, 2014, 44-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2014.23

Whitmer, J., Schiorring, E., y James, P. (2014). Patterns of persistence: what engages students in a remedial English writing MOOC? In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 279-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567601

Wolfenden, F., Cross, S., y Henry, F. (2017). MOOC adaptation and translation to improve equity in participation. Journal of Learning for Development-JL4D, 4(2). Recuperado de: https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/209/243

Author Biography

Paz Díez-Arcón, Universidad Nacional a Distancia

Investigadora en formación. Líneas de trabajo: aprendizaje de lenguas asistidas por ordenador, enseñanza en abierto y metodologías de aprendizaje para la innovación educativa. Proyectos: Erasmus +, Innovación Docente e I+D+I. He sido profesora asociada en la UNED y he participado en congresos nacionales e internacionales. Revisora de “Lengua y Migración”.

Published

2022-03-01

How to Cite

Díez-Arcón, P. (2022). Participant profiles in LMOOCs: a literature review and case study. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 14(4), e979. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.979

Downloads