The Logic of Violence. Walter Benjamin’s Cardinal Antagonisms

Authors

  • Federico Rodríguez Universidad de Sevilla

Abstract

These pages take a fresh look at some of the irreducible complexities of the philosophical problem of violence (its theological-political delimitation and eventual use), on the occasion of Peter Fenves and Julia Ng’s recent English critical edition of Walter Benjamin’s classic essay Toward the Critique of Violence (1921), published on the centenary of the original German text. Starting from this eminently philological context, we would like to show how, in this essay, the true and antagonistic intimacy between so-called “nonviolence” (a politics of pure means) and the “doctrine of non-action” (a Taoist reversal of Kantian morality) is determined through a logical critique of pacifism (as dogmatic, contradictory, metaphysical, “a more remote theorem”). Benjamin’s critique is also crystallized through an exceptional and profound reading of the divine commandment of the Torah: “Thou shalt not kill” (Ex 20, 13).

Keywords

action, self-defense, contradiction, murder, heart, justice, responsibility, pacifism, nothing, anarchism

References

ANONYME. The Huainanzi. New York: Columbia U.P., 2010, 580-615.

ARISTOTLE. Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford U.P., 1924.

BENJAMIN, Walter. Gesammelte Schriften (GS). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1991.

BENJAMIN, Walter (1914). “Die religiöse Stellung der neuen Jugend”, GS II.1, 71-74 [Early Writings. Cambridge: Harvard U.P., 2011, 168-170].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1914-5). “Zwei Gedichte von Friedrich Hölderlin”, GS II.1, 105-126 [Selected Writings (SW). Cambridge: Harvard U. Press, 1996, vol. 1, 18-36].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1915). “Das Leben der Studenten”, GS II.1, 75-87 [SW I, 37-37].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1916a). “Notizen zur einer Arbeit über die Kategorie der Gerechtigkeit”. Scholem, Gershom, Tagebücher. Frankfurt: Jüdischer, 1995-2000, vol. 1, 401-402 [Toward the Critique of Violence. A Critical Edition (TCV). Stanford: Stanford U.P., 2021, 65-66].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1916b). “Über Sprache überhaupt und über Sprache des Menschen”, GS II.1, 140-157 [SW 1, 62-74].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1916-17a). “Das Urteil der Bezeichnung”, GS VI, 9-11.

BENJAMIN, Walter (1916-17b). “Leben und Gewalt”, GS VII.2, 791 [TCV, 68]; Benjamin-Archiv, Ms 505.

BENJAMIN, Walter (1917). “Der Centaur”, GS VII, 26 [TCV, 67].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1919-20a). “Über den ‘Kreter’”, GS VI, 57-59 [SW I, 210-212].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1919-20b). “Welt und Zeit”, GS VI, 98-100 [TCV, 83-44].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1920). “Das Recht zur Gewaltanwendung”, GS VI, 104-108 [TCV, 86-89].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1920-1). “Die Bedeutung der Zeit in der moralischen Welt“, GS VI, 97-98 [TCV, 81-82].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1921a). “Zur Kritik der Gewalt”, GS II.1, 179-203 [TCV, 39-61].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1921b). “Schicksal und Charakter”, GS II.1, 171-179 [SW 1, 201-206].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1923). “Die Aufgabe des Übersetzers”, GS II.2, 9-21 [SW I, 253-263].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1929). “Der Surrealismus”, GS II.1, 295-310 [SW 2.1, 207-221].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1938). “Theologisch-politisches Fragment”, GS II.1, 203-204 [SW 3, 305-306].

BENJAMIN, Walter (1940). “Über den Begriff der Geschichte”, GS I.2, 691-704 [SW 4, 389-400].

CAMUS, Albert. Œuvres complètes. Paris: Gallimard, 2008.

CAMUS, Albert (1951). L’homme révolté, vol. 3, 61-324.

CAMUS, Albert (1959). Les possédés, vol. 4, 395-552.

CORTÉS, Donoso. Obras completas. Madrid: BAC, 1946.

CORTÉS, Donoso (1849). “Discurso sobre la dictadura”, vol. 2, 187-204.

DOSTOYEVSKY, Fiódor M. (1871-72). The possessed. Melbourne, William Heinemann, 1914.

FENVES, Peter (2011). The Messianic Reduction. Stanford: Stanford U.P., 125-151.

FENVES, Peter (2017). “Toward Messianic Nature—from Cohen to Benjamin”. Paradigmi: Rivista di critica filosofica, 35, 13-25.

FENVES, Peter (2018). “Benjamin, Studying, China”. Positions, 26 (1), 35-57.

FENVES, Peter (2020). “A Close Affinity with the Concept of the Dao”. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 41 (6), 68-74.

FENVES, Peter (2021). “Introduction”. TCV, 1-37.

HA’AM, Achad (1904). Am Scheidewege. Berlin: Jüdischer.

HA’AM, Achad (1895). “Die Lehre des Herzens”, Bd, 1, 98-114.

HAMACHER, Werner (1994). “Afformativ, Streik”. Was heißt Darstellen? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 340-371.

HILLER, Kurt (1919). “Anti-Kain”. Das Ziel: Jahrbücher für geistige Politik 3 (1919): 24-32 [TCV, 185-193].

HÖLDERLIN, Friedrich. Sämtliche Werke: Kohlhammer, 1951.

HÖLDERLIN, Friedrich (1807). “Patmos”, Bd. 2, 165-172.

KANT, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften (GS). Berlín: Georg Reimer, 1910-2009.

KANT, Immanuel (1781/89). Kritik der reinen Vernunft, GS 2 [Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1999].

KANT, Immanuel (1794). “Das Ende aller Dinge”, GS 6, 175-90 [217-31. En: Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1996].

LAOZI. TaoteKing. Jena: Eugen Diederichs, 1910.

LUPASCO, Stéphane (1951). Le principe d’antagonisme et la logique de l’énergie. Paris: Hermann.

NECHAEV, Serge (1869). “The Catechism of a Revolutionary”. Philip Pomper, Sergei Nechaev. New Brunswick: Rutgers U.P., 1979, 90-94.

NG, Julia (2021). “Afterword”. TCV, 113-60.

NG, Julia (2021). “The Action of Non-Action”. Theory, Culture & Society (Forthcoming).

PULLIERO, Marino (2013). Walter Benjamin. Le désir d’authenticité. Paris: Hermann.

SCHOLEM, Gershom (1918). “Der Bolschewismus”. Tagebücher, vol. 2, 556-558 [Jacobson, Eric. Metaphysics of the Profane, New York: Columbia U.P., 2003, 195-196].

SCHOLEM, Gershom (1980). Walter Benjamin—die Geschichte einer Freundschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

SCHMITT, Carl (1921). Die Diktatur. München: Duncker & Humblot.

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

Rodríguez, F. (2024). The Logic of Violence. Walter Benjamin’s Cardinal Antagonisms. Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason, 72, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1510

Downloads