“I have learned a lot of things about other neighborhoods”: Secondary students as Linguistic Landscapes ethnographers
Abstract
Linguistic Landscape (LL) has been recognized as a valuable tool by foreign language teachers that allows them to incorporate the “outside” world into the classroom (Kruszynska & Dolly, 2023). In this study, secondary school students, as ethnographers, investigated LL in their neighborhoods. Utilizing their critical thinking skills, they engaged with collected data and produced news report in which reflected on their ethnographic LL projects. The project prompted students to critically examine cultural practices from their own perspectives (Roberts et al., 2000).
This project empowered the participants to actively contribute to the construction of their own knowledge, rather than being passive observers. It also provided insights into the students’ perspectives on the LL-based project. The findings indicate that LL-based tasks can serve as a powerful tool to enhance students’ awareness of their surroundings’ linguistic diversity and, if effectively utilized, can cultivate their critical and higher-order thinking skills.
Keywords
Linguistic landscape, Students as ethnographers, Critical thinking skills, Higher order thinking skills, Students’ perspectiveReferences
Alsaleh, N. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 19(1), 21-39. http://www.tojet.net/volumes/v19i1.pdf
Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Centre for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/
Beyer, B. K. (1985). Critical thinking: What is it? Social Education, 49(4), 270-276.
Bucholtz, M., Lopez, A., Mojarro, A., Skapoulli, E., VanderStouwe, C., & Warner‐Garcia, S. (2014). Sociolinguistic Justice in the Schools: Student Researchers as Linguistic Experts. Language and Linguistic Compass, 8(4), 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12070
Campbell, A. & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2009). Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education: International perspectives and practical solutions. Routledge.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2008). Linguistic Landscape as an additional source of input in second language acquisition, IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(3), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2008.012
Chern, C., & Dooley, K. (2014). Learning English by walking down the street. ELT Journal, 68(2),113-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/let/ccto67
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). Cambridge University Press.
Craig, M.O., (1995). Students as ethnographers. Practicing Antrophology, 17(3), 20-21.
Stanulewicz (Eds.), Insights into technology enhanced language pedagogy (pp. 11-25). Peter Lang.
D’warte, J. (2015). Building Knowledge About and With Students: Linguistic Ethnography in Two Secondary School Classrooms. English in Australia, 50(1), 39-48.
Elola, I. & Prada, J. (2020). Developing critical sociolinguistic awareness through linguistic landscapes in a mixed classroom: the case of Spanish in Texas. In D. Malinowski, H.H. Maxim & S. Dubreil (Eds.). Language teaching in the linguistic landscape, Mobilizing pedagogy in public space (pp. 223-250). Springer.
Gorter, D. (2006). Introduction: The study of the linguistic landscape as a new approach to multilingualism. In D. Gorter (Ed.). Linguistic landscape (pp. 1-6). Multilingual Matters.
Gorter, D. (2018). Methods and techniques for linguistic landscape research: About definitions, core issues and technological innovations. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, language policy and the use of space as a semiotic resource (pp. 38-57). Multilingual Matters.
Hernández-Martín, L., & Skrandies, P. (2020). Taking the Foreign out of Language Teaching: Opening up the Classroom to the Multilingual City. In: D. Malinowski, H.H. Maxim & S. Dubreil (Eds.), Language Teaching in the Linguistic Landscape (v. 49, pp 293-325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55761-4_13
Kruszynska, K. & Dooly, M. (2023). Thinking allowed: linguistic landscapes-based projects for higher-order and critical thinking skills. In S. Melo-Pfeifer (Ed). Linguistic landscapes and teacher education (pp. 75-90). Springer.
Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 16-46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1177186
Kurfiss, J. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R.Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x970161002
Leander, K., Philips, N., & Taylor, K. (2010). The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobilities. Sage Journals, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X0935829
Lozano, M.E., Jiménez-Caicedo, J.P. & Abraham, L. (2020). Linguistic landscape projects in language teaching: Opportunities for critical language learning beyond the classroom. In D. Malinowski, H.H. Maxim & S. Dubreil (Eds.), Language teaching in the linguistic landscape. Mobilizing pedagogy in public space (pp. 17-42). Springer.
Malinowski, D. (2015). Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape, Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.06mal
Malinowski, D., Maxim, H.H., & Dubreil, S. (2020). Language teaching in the linguistic landscape. Mobilizing pedagogy in public space. Springer.
Melo-Pfeifer, S. (Ed.) (2023). Linguistic landscapes and teacher education. Springer.
Nussbaum, L. (2017). Investigar con docentes. In E. Moore & M. Dooly (Eds), Qualitative approaches to research on plurilingual education / Enfocaments qualitatius per a la recerca en ducació plurilingüe / Enfoques cualitativos para la investigación en educación plurilingüe (pp. 23-45). Research-publishing.net.
Pithers, R., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Researcher, 42(3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800440579
Roberts, C., Byram, M., Barro, A., Jordan, S., & Street, B.V. (2000). Language learners as ethnographers. Multilingual Matters.
Rowland, L. (2013). The pedagogical benefits of a linguistic landscape project in Japan. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(4), 494-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.708319
Sayer, P. (2010). Using the linguistic landscape as a pedagogical resource. ELT Journal, 64(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp051
Sayer, P. (2020). Ethnographic language learning projects through the linguistic landscape. In D. Malinowski, H.H. Maxim & S. Dubreil (Eds.), Language teaching in the linguistic landscape, Mobilizing pedagogy in public space (pp. 327-347). Springer.
Silbey, S. (2021a). Qualitative research methods: data coding and analysis. edX MITx 21A.819.2x online course: www.edx.org
Silbey, S. (2021b). Qualitative research methods: conversational interviewing. edX MITx 21A.819.1x online course: www.edx.org
Solmaz, O., & Przymus, S. (Eds.). (2021). Linguistic landscapes in English language teaching. A pedagogical guidebook. https://www.llinelt project.com.
Tavory I., & Timmermans S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
Ying, Z. (2019). Beliefs of EFL learners towards pedagogical values of linguistic landscape in China: A case study carried out in three schools. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 31(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2019/v31i3
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Klaudia Anan Kruszynska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
