Space-making and aesthetics: Adaptive restoration, new functions and their experience in architecture

Authors

  • Zoltán Somhegyi Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary

Abstract

In this study I investigate several questions related to adaptive restoration, i.e. when a functioning piece of architecture operates with a different purpose to its original one, as well as the role of aesthetics in re-purposing, and the importance of the special forms of experience such a conversion provides. The questions connected to these architectural projects are not only theoretically inspiring, leading to diverse and broad fields of research in architecture, art and aesthetics, but are also crucial on a practical level, and hence require caution and precise consideration, given the impact the final results of such projects may have, as well as in terms of the effect and efficiency of the new space. Creative and adaptive re-purpose, modification or complete change of function can have wonderful potential, as well as, obviously, presenting serious hazards to avoid. What is equally important, however, is that this will also contribute to a strengthening of awareness of architecture and its aesthetic qualities, hence further promoting the idea of safeguarding and care of edifices and of tangible heritage.

Keywords

creative re-purpose, adaptive re-purpose, aesthetic experience, change of function, ruins, restoration, reconstruction, aesthetics of architecture

References

ANDRZEJEWSKI, Adam (2017). “Authenticity Manifested: Street Art and Artification”. Rivista di estetica, 64 (1), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2077

ANDRZEJEWSKI, Adam and SALWA, Mateusz (2020). “What is an Urban Atmosphere?”. Contemporary Aesthetics, Special Volume 8 Urban Aesthetics. Retrieved from https://contempaesthetics.org/2020/07/16/what-is-an-urban-atmosphere/.

BLOSZIES, Charles (2012). Old Buildings, New Designs. Architectural Transformations. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

BOLLACK, Françoise Astorg (2013). Old Buildings, New Forms. New Directions in Architectural Transformations. New York: The Monacelli Press.

CAMOCINI, Barbara and NOSOVA, Oxana (2017). “A second life for Contemporary Ruins. Temporary Adaptive Reuse strategies of Interior Design to reinterpret vacant spaces”. The Design Journal, 20 (sup 1), S1558-S1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352680

DE CLERCQ, Rafael (2013). “The Metaphysics of Art Restoration”. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 53 (3), 261-275. Retrieved from https://contempaesthetics.org/2020/11/16/reconstructing-heritage-places-values-attachment/.

EDENSOR, Tim (2005). Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics, Materiality. Oxford: Berg.

EDENSOR, Tim (2007). “Sensing the Ruin”. The Senses and Society, 2 (2), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589307X203100

GIOMBINI, Lisa (2020a). “For the Sake of Authenticity: Philosophical Concerns in Art Conservation”. In: SOMHEGYI, Zoltán and RYYNÄNEN, Max (Eds.). Aesthetics in Dialogue. Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World. Berlin: Peter Lang, 203-221.

GIOMBINI, Lisa (2020b). “Reconstructing Heritage: Places, Values, Attachment”. Contemporary Aesthetics, 18. Retrieved from https://contempaesthetics.org/2020/11/16/reconstructing-heritage-places-values-attachment/.

GIOMBINI, Lisa (2021). “Respect in Conservation Ethics: A Philosophical Inquiry”. Studies in Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2021.1940797

GÖBEL, Hanna Katharina (2015). The Re-Use of Urban Ruins. Atmospheric Inquiries of the City. New York – London: Routledge.

JACKS, Philip (2008). “Restauratio and Reuse: The Afterlife of Roman Ruins”. Places, 20, 10-20. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/66n5329v.

KOOLHAAS, Rem (2002). “Junkspace”. October, 100, 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228702320218457

KORSMEYER, Carolyn (2008). “Aesthetic Deception. On Encounters with the Past”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66 (2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2008.00293.x

KORSMEYER, Carolyn (2019). Things. In Touch with the Past. New York: Oxford University Press.

LAMARQUE, Peter (2016). “Reflections on the Ethics and Aesthetics of Restoration and Conservation”. British Journal of Aesthetics, 56 (3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayw041

LAMARQUE, Peter and WALTER, Nigel (2019). “The Application of Narrative to the Conservation of Historic Buildings”. Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics, 56 (1), 5-27. http://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.181

LEHTINEN, Sanna (2020). “Buildings as Objects of Car in the Urban Environment”. In: SOMHEGYI, Zoltán and RYYNÄNEN, Max (Eds.). Aesthetics in Dialogue. Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World. Berlin: Peter Lang, 223-236.

MCGRATH, Stephen (6 July, 2021). “Romania’s monument ‘ambulance’ races to save country’s past”. The Associated Press News. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-europe-romania-arts-and-entertainment-68a7f0a4db39287baeb07a165bb8aa27.

MERCATO COPERTO WEBSITE: https://mercatocopertodiravenna.it/storia-e-progetto-timeline/ (last access: 13 September, 2021)

MUSEO DELLA CITTÀ E DEL TERRITORIO WEBSITE: https://classisravenna.it/?lang=en (last access: 13 September, 2021)

RIEGL, Alois (1982). “The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Its Origin”. Oppositions, 25, 21-51.

RYYNÄNEN, Max (2018). “Historical Cityscapes as Museums and Theme Parks”. In: RYYNÄNEN, Max and SOMHEGYI, Zoltán. Learning from Decay: Essays on the Aesthetics of Architectural Dereliction and Its Consumption. Berlin: Peter Lang, 43-54.

SAGOFF, Mark (1978). “On Restoring and Reproducing Art”. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 453-470.

SAITO, Yuriko (2020). “Aesthetics of Care”. In: SOMHEGYI, Zoltán and RYYNÄNEN, Max (Eds.). Aesthetics in Dialogue. Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World. Berlin: Peter Lang, 187-201.

SOMHEGYI, Zoltán (2020). Reviewing the Past. The Presence of Ruins. London – New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

SYNDRAM, Dirk (1988). “Die Baudenkmäler Roms. Wirklichkeit–Kunst–Wissenschaft”. In: SYNDRAM, Dirk (Ed.). Zwischen Phantasie und Wirklichkeit: Römische Ruinen in Zeichnungen des 16. bis 19. Jahrhunderts aus Beständen der Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 10-21.

TANNINEN-MATTILA, Maija (2021). “Preface”. In: TUULIKANGAS, Sanna (Ed.). Katharina Grosse. Chill Seeping from the Walls Gets between Us. Helsinki, Helsinki Art Museum Publications, 4-8.

THE PRITZKER ARCHITECTURAL PRIZE WEBSITE: https://www.pritzkerprize.com/laureates/anne-lacaton-and-jean-philippe-vassal (last access: 13 September, 2021)

USBORNE, Simon (2021, May 29/30). “A night in the cells”. Financial Times Weekend, 7.

WOODWARD, Christopher (2008). Tra le rovine: Un viaggio attraverso la storia, l’arte e la letteratura. Parma: Ugo Guanda Editore.

Author Biography

Zoltán Somhegyi, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary

Zoltán Somhegyi is a Hungarian art historian with a PhD in aesthetics and a Habilitation (venia legendi) in philosophy, and is Associate Professor of Art History at the Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary. As a researcher, he specialises in eighteenth-nineteenth century art and theory, while his other fields of interest are contemporary fine arts and art criticism. He was the Secretary General (2016-2022) and he is website editor of the International Association for Aesthetics, a member of the executive committee of the International Council for Philosophy and Human Sciences, a consultant of Art Market Budapest: International Contemporary Art Fair, and editor-in-chief of HAS – Humanities, Arts & Society Magazine. His recent books are Reviewing the Past. The Presence of Ruins (London-New York: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2020) and Aesthetics in Dialogue. Applying Philosophy of Art in a Global World (Berlin: Peter Lang, 2020; co-edited with Max Ryynänen). www.zoltansomhegyi.com

Published

2022-10-25

How to Cite

Somhegyi, Z. (2022). Space-making and aesthetics: Adaptive restoration, new functions and their experience in architecture. Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason, 69, 85–103. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1395

Downloads