Vulnerabilidad y deliberación en tiempos de epidemia

Lydia Feito Grande

doi:10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1303

Vulnerability and deliberation in times of epidemic

Authors

Lydia Feito Grande Universidad Complutense de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-5470

PDF (ES)

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic has brought us face to face with an unprecedented situation in which we discover our vulnerability in varied and dramatic ways. Although protected by powerful technology, we now observe our enormous hardship in failing to respond to the threat to our health and survival. Our fragility is revealed in different ways: the vulnerability of our bodily and mortal condition, which forces us to take refuge in confinement, isolate ourselves from an environment that has become hostile and where we also discover our psychological vulnerability; the vulnerability of the most helpless situations, which highlight the weakness of the social and health systems to protect those who are in a more delicate condition; the vulnerability of resource management systems, which face complex decision-making processes to preserve justice; and what we could call a moral vulnerability, because our ability to manage deliberative environments to adequately resolve value conflicts is questioned. These vulnerable environments need to be examined to account for how the reality of the pandemic forces us to rethink and develop an ethic commensurate with the circumstances.

Keywords

vulnerability, justice, deliberation, ethics, humanization

References

BOLDT, J. (2019). «The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy». Philosophy, Ethics and Humanity in Medicine, 14 (1), 6.

DOMINGO, T. (2019). «Hacia una antropología hermenéutica del sufrimiento: Fenomenología de la acción (y del sufrir), ética de la resistencia y hermenéutica de la parsimonia. (Una presentación de El sufrimiento no es el dolor de Paul Ricœur)». Isegoría, 60, 75-91.

DOMINGO, T. y FEITO, L. (2013). Bioética narrativa. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo.

FEITO, L. (2007). «Vulnerabilidad». Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 30 (3), 7-22.

FINEMAN, M.A. (2008). «The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition». Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 20 (1), 1-23.

GRACIA, D. (2011). «Teoría y práctica de la deliberación moral». En: FEITO, L.; GRACIA, D. y SÁNCHEZ, M.A. (eds.). Bioética: El estado de la cuestión. Madrid: Triacastela, 101-154.

GRUPO DE TRABAJO ÉTICA Y COVID (EUSKADI) – ABFYC (2020). ¿La salud de quién estamos defendiendo?: Desigualdades sociales y sanitarias en tiempo de pandemia. Recuperado de http://www.asociacionbioetica.com/blog/la-salud-de-quien-estamos-defendiendo-desigualdades-sociales-y-sanitarias-en-tiempo-de-pandemia

GUTMANN, A. y THOMPSON, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton University Press.

HAVE, H. ten (2014). «The principle of vulnerability in the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights». En: THAM, J.; GARCIA, A. y MIRANDA, G. (eds.). Religious Perspectives on Human Vulnerability in Bioethics: Advancing Global Bioethics, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Springer.

HAVE, H. ten (2016). Vulnerability: Challenging bioethics. Nueva York: Routledge.

HOFFMASTER, B. (2006). «What does vulnerability mean?». Hastings Center Report, 36, 38-45.

JASPERS, K. (1978). La filosofía desde el punto de vista de la existencia. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. (1923). «El tema de nuestro tiempo». En: Obras Completas. Tomo II. Madrid: Taurus.

ORTEGA Y GASSET, J. (1940). «Ideas y creencias». En: Obras completas. Tomo V. Madrid: Taurus.

RENDTORFF, J. y KEMP, P. (2000). Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Barcelona: Instituto Borja de Bioética.

RICOEUR, P. (2005). Caminos del reconocimiento. Madrid: Trotta.

RICOEUR, P. (2008). «Autonomía y vulnerabilidad». En: Lo justo 2: Estudios, lecturas y ejercicios de ética aplicada. Madrid: Trotta.

WALKER, M.U. (2014). «Moral Vulnerability and the Task of Reparations». En: MACKENZIE, C.; ROGERS, W. y DODDS, S. (eds.). Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 111-133.

Author Biography

Lydia Feito Grande, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Lydia Feito Grande is a professor in the School of Medicine at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM). She holds a PhD in Philosophy and Humanities, a PhD in Neuroscience, a Master of Bioethics and a Master of Neuropsychology. She is president of the Association of Fundamental and Clinical Bioethics and director of the UCM Bioethics Research Seminar and the Bioética Complutense journal. She is member of the Ethics Interest Group of the Spanish Fertility Society, the ethics committee of the Fundación Alcorcón University Hospital and member of the CASER Residencial ethics committee. Among other publications, she is the author of Neuroética: Cómo hace juicios morales nuestro cerebro, Madrid, Plaza y Valdés, 2019; Bioética narrativa together with T. Domingo Madrid, Escolar y Mayo, 2013; and Ética y enfermería, Madrid, Ediciones San Pablo, 2009.