Anscombe reading Aristotle
Abstract
Under one particular reading of it, Anscombe’s ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ is considered a seminal text in the revival of virtue ethics. Seen thus, Anscombe is implying that it is possible to do ethics without using concepts such as ‘moral ought’ or ‘moral obligation’, the perfect example being Aristotelian ethics. On the other hand, Anscombe claims that it is not useful at present to engage in moral philosophy since she finds that ‘philosophically there is a huge gap… which needs to be filled by an account of human nature, human action, …and above all of human “flourishing”’ (Anscombe, 1958: 18). The gap Anscombe refers to appears where there should be a ‘proof that an unjust man is a bad man’. My aim in this paper is to discuss the various ways in which Anscombe’s theses can be interpreted, recalling two other philosophers for whom Aristotelian virtue ethics was also essential: P. Foot and J. McDowell. I will argue that Anscombe did not expect Aristotelian ethics to answer the problems modern ethics poses.Keywords
‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Aristotelian ethics, virtue ethics, moral naturalism, Philippa Foot, John McDowellReferences
ANSCOMBE, G.E.M. (1958). “Modern Moral Philosophy”. Philosophy, 53, 1-19. Reprinted in Anscombe 1991 and in Anscombe 2005.
ANSCOMBE, G.E.M. (1969). “On Promising and its Justice”. Critica, 3 (7/8), 61-83. Reprinted in Anscombe 1991.
ANSCOMBE, G.E.M. (1991). Collected Philosophical Papers, vol III: Ethics, Religion and Politics. Minneapolis, MN: Wiley-Blackwell.
ANSCOMBE, G.E.M. (2005). Human Life, Action and Ethics. Edited by M. Geach and L. Gormally. Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.
ARISTOTLE (2009). The Nichomachean Ethics. Translated by David Ross. New York: Oxford University Press.
BLACKBURN, Simon (2005). “Simply Wrong”. Times Literary Supplement, 5348, 11-12.
CRISP, Roger (2004). “Does Modern Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?”. In: Modern Moral Philosophy (Royal Institute of Philosophy, Supplement 54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100008456
FOOT, Philippa (2003). Natural Goodness. New York: Oxford University Press.
HACKER, P.M.S (2007). Human Nature: the Categorial Framework. Blackwell Publishing.
MACINTYRE, Alastair (1984). After Virtue, 2nd edition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
MCDOWELL, John (1980). “The Role of Eudaimonia in Aristotle’s Ethics’”. In: Amélie OKSENBERG RORTY (ed.). Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. University of California Press, 359-376. Reprinted in McDowell 1998.
MCDOWELL, John (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
MCDOWELL, John (1998). Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
PIGDEN, Charles (1988). “Anscombe on ‘Ought’”. The Philosophical Quarterly, 38 (150), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2220265
SOLOMON, David (2008). “Elizabeth Anscombe’s ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’: Fifty Years Later”. Christian Bioethics, 14 (2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbn015
TIBERIUS, Valerie (2003). “Cultural Differences and Philosophical Accounts of Well-Being”. Journal of Happiness Studies 5 (3), 293-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-8791-y
VOGLER, Candace (2006). “Modern Moral Philosophy Again: Isolating the Promulgation Problem”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106, 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00152.x
WILLIAMS, Bernard (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2020 Susana Cadilha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
