Monopolizando el centro. El AKP y el incierto rumbo de la democracia turca

Autors/ores

  • Ziya Öniş Center for Research on Globalization and Democratic Governance (GLODEM) at Koç University in Istanbul, Turkey Turquía

Resum

La pérdida de impulso reformador y el creciente autoritarismo de la más reciente fase de gobierno del AKP nos indican que la democracia turca está en crisis. Las protestas de Gezi, aunque emergieron como un movimiento desde abajo en respuesta al creciente autoritarismo del gobierno del AKP, no llegaron a convertirse en un movimiento organizado y sostenido. Asimismo, los referentes externos y sus efectos sobre la reputación de la democracia turca no están consiguiendo revertir su involución. La noción de “comunidades acotadas” es un concepto clave para explicar la continuada dominación de Erdoğan y el AKP frente a fuertes presiones de cambio. La victoria de Erdoğan en las elecciones presidenciales de agosto de 2014 genera escenarios tanto benévolos como pesimistas para el futuro de la democracia turca. 

Paraules clau

consolidación democrática, democracia iliberal, partidos dominantes, política turca, Unión Europea

Referències

Aydınlı [2011] Aydınlı, E. “Ergenekon, New Pacts, and the Decline of the Turkish ‘In-ner State’ ”. Turkish Studies 12, no. 2 (2011): 227-39

Bechev [2014] Bechev, D. Turkey’s Illiberal Turn, ECFR Policy Brief. London: Euro-pean Council on Foreign Relations, 2014. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR108_TURKEY_BRIEF_(2).pdf

Buğra, Savaşkan [2014] Buğra, A., and O. Savaşkan. New Capitalism in Turkey: The Relationship between Politics, Religion and Business. London: Edward Elgar, 2014

Çarkoğlu [2014], Çarkoğlu, A. Electoral Constellations towards the August 2014 Presidential Elections in Turkey, GTE Policy Brief no. 17. Rome: Istituto Affari Inter-nazionali, 2014

Çarkoğlu [2014] Çarkoğlu, A. “Plus ça Change Plus C’est La Meme Chose: Consoli-dation of the AKP’s Predominance in the March 2014 Local Elections in Turkey”. South European Society and Politics 19, no. 2 (2014): 169-92

Çarkoğlu [2011], Çarkoğlu, A. “Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?”. Insight Turkey 13, no. 3 (2011): 43-62

Çarkoğlu, Kalaycıoğlu [2009], Çarkoğlu, A., and E. Kalaycıoğlu. The Rising Tide of Conservatism in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009

Cengiz [2014], Cengiz, F. “The Future of Democratic Reform in Turkey: Constitutional Moment or Constitutional Process”. Government and Opposition, first version, pub-lished online (May 2014): 1-22

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9345569&fileId=S0017257X14000141

Diamond [2002], Diamond, L. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes”. Journal of Democ-racy 13, no. 2 (2002): 21-35

European Commission [2013] European Commission. Turkey’s 2013 Progress Re-port. Extract from the Communication from the Commission to the European Par-liament and the Council ‘Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2013-2014’, COM(2013) 700 final, 16 October 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2013/package/brochures/turkey_2013.pdf.

Göle [2013], “Public Space Democracy”, eurozine, 29 July 2013, http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2013-07-29-gole-en.html

Gülmez [2013], Gülmez, B. “The EU Policy of the Republican People's Party under Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu: A New Wine in an Old Wine Cellar”. Turkish Studies 14, no. 2 (2013): 311-28

Gümüşçü [2013], Gümüşçü, Ş. “The Emerging Predominant Party System in Turkey”. Government and Opposition 48, no. 2 (2013): 223-44

Kalaycıoğlu [2012], Kalaycıoğlu, E. “Kulturkampf in Turkey: Constitutional Referen-dum of September 10 2010”. South European Society and Politics 17, no. 1 (2012): 1-22

Keyman, Gümüşçü [2014], Keyman, F. E., and Ş. Gümüşçü. Democracy, Identity and Foreign Policy in Turkey: Hegemony through Transformation. New York: Palgrave and Macmillan, 2014

Levitsky, L. Way [2002], Levitsky, S., and L. Way. “The Rise of Competitive Authori-tarianism”. Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 51-65

Linklater [1998], Linklater, A. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Polity, 1998

Müftüler-Baç [2005], Müftüler-Baç, M. “Turkey’s Political reforms and the Impact of the European Union”. South European Society and Politics 10, no. 1 (2005): 16-30

Müftüler-Baç, Keyman [2012], Müftüler-Baç, M., and F.E. Keyman. “The Era of Dominant Party Politics”. Journal of Democracy 23 no. 1 (2012): 85-99

Öniş [2014], Öniş, Z. “Turkey and the Arab Revolutions: Boundaries of Regional Power Influence in a Turbulent Middle East”. Mediterranean Politics 19, no. 2 (2014): 203-19

Öniş [2013], Öniş, Z. “Turkey’s Democratization Challenge in the Age of the AKP He-gemony”. Insight Turkey 15, no. 2 (2013): 103-22

Öniş [2012], Öniş, Z. “The Triumph of Conservative Globalism: The Political Economy of the AKP Era”. Turkish Studies 13, no. 2 (2012): 135-52

Öniş [2013], Öniş, Z., and M. Kutlay. “Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: The Political Economy of Turkey in the Age of BRICs”. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 8 (2013): 1409-26

Özbudun [2014], Özbudun, E. “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift”. South European Society and Politics 19, no. 2 (2014): 155-67

Özkırımlı [2014], Özkırımlı, U., ed. The Making of a Protest Movement in Turkey & Occupy Gezi. London: Palgrave Pivot, 2014

Özpek [s.f.] Özpek, B. B. “A Peace That Frightens Liberals: How to Solve the Kurdish Question in Turkey?” unpublished manuscript

Rodriguez, et al [2013], Rodriguez, C., A. Antanio and H. Yılmaz, eds. Turkey’s De-mocratization Process. London: Routledge, 2013

Rumelili [2011], Rumelili, B. “Turkey: Identity, Foreign Policy, and Socialization in post-Enlargement Europe”. Journal of European Integration 33, no. 2 (2011): 235-49.

Smith et al [1996], Smith, S., K. Booth and Z. Marysia. International Theory: Positivism & Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996

Tugal [2013], Tugal, C. “‘Resistance everywhere’: The Gezi revolt in global perspec-tive”. New Perspectives on Turkey 49 (2013): 157-72

Yörük [2014], Yörük, E. “The Long Summer of Turkey: The Gezi Uprising and its His-torical Roots”. South Atlantic Quarterly 113, no. 2 (2014): 419-26

Yörük, Yüksel [2014], Yörük, E., and M. Yüksel. “Class And Politics In Turkey’s Gezi Protests”. New Left Review 89 (2014): 103-23

Zakaria [1997], Zakaria, F. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy”. Foreign Affairs 76, no.2 (1997): 22-43‬‬‬

Biografia de l'autor/a

Ziya Öniş, Center for Research on Globalization and Democratic Governance (GLODEM) at Koç University in Istanbul, Turkey Turquía

Professor of International Relations and the Director of the Center for Research on Globalization and Democratic Governance (GLODEM) at Koç University in Istanbul, Turkey

Publicades

19-07-2016

Com citar

Öniş, Z. (2016). Monopolizando el centro. El AKP y el incierto rumbo de la democracia turca. Tiempo Devorado, 3(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tdevorado.70

Descàrregues