Landscape and Environment: a conceptual distinction

Authors

  • Adriana Veríssimo Serrão Departamento de Filosofia e Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa

Abstract

In this article, I aim to show how the concept of environment inevitably leads to contradictory consequences when it is taken as a major category of a worldview that seeks to recognize, appreciate and protect natural spaces: on the one hand, it devalues the role of each particular element, subsuming it into sets and wholes; on the other, it rigidly opposes the human and the non-human as two separate spheres. On the contrary, a world view founded on the category of Landscape, a synthetic category which involves a natural foundation with human dimensions, allows resuming harmonies and modes of living in a world marked by profound divisions and worrying signs of disintegration of the human.

Keywords

landscape, environment, nature, aesthetics, human living

References

ASSUNTO, R. (1976). «Paesaggio, Ambiente, Territorio: Un tentativo di precisazione concettuale». Bollettino del Centro Internazionale di Studi di Architettura Andrea Palladio, 18. Tradução em português: Serrão (2011), 128- 129.

ASSUNTO, R. (2005). Il paesaggio e l’estetica. 2a edição. Palermo: Edizioni Novecento.

BERLEANT, A. (1997). Living in the Landscape: Towards an Aesthetics of Environment. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

— (2012). «O significado mutável da paisagem». Em: Serrão (2012), 347 s.

BERQUE, A. (1993). «L’écoumène, mesure terrestre de l’homme, mesure humaine de la Terre: Pour une problématique du monde ambiant». L’Espace Géographique, 4, 299305. Tradução em português: Serrão (2011).

CALLICOTT, J. B. (2008). «Leopold’s Land Aesthetic». Em: Carlson, A. e Lintott, S. (eds.). Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism. Nova Iorque: Columbia University Press.

CARLSON, A. (2009). «Contemporary Environmental Aesthetics and the Requirements of Environmentalism». Aesthetics, JTLA, Journal of the Faculty of Letters. The University of Tokyo, 34.

DEMANGEOT, J. (1994). Les Milieux «naturels» du globe. Paris/Milan/Barcelone: Masson.

DIFFEY, T. J. (1993). «Natural Beauty without Metaphysics». Em: Kemal, S. e Gaskell, I. (eds.). Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

GODLOVITCH, S. (1994). «Icebreakers: Environmentalism and Natural Aesthetics». Reimpr. em: Carlson, A. e Berleant, A. (eds.). The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2004.

HARGROVE, E. (1979). «The Historical Foundations of American Environmental Attitudes». Environmental Ethics [em linha], 1, 209-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19791314

HETTINGER, N. (2005). «Allen Carlson’s Environmental Aesthetics and the Protection of the Environment». Environmental Ethics [em linha], 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200527141

LE DANTEC, J.-P. (1996). Jardins et Paysages: Une Anthologie. Paris: Éditions de la Villette.

LE ROY, L.G. (1977). «Principes écologiques qui devraient régir jardins et paysages». Em: Le Dantec, J.-P. (1996), Jardins et Paysages: Une Anthologie. Paris: Éditions de la Villette, 456-457.

NISHIMURA, K. (2011). «The Aesthetics of Smell and Taste for the Appreciation of Landscape». JTLA, Journal of the Faculty of Letters. The University of Tokyo, 36.

SAITO, Y. (1998). «Appreciating Nature on Its Own Terms». Environmental Ethics [em linha], 20, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199820228

SERRÃO, A. V. (coord.) (2011). Filosofia da Paisagem: Uma Antologia. Lisboa: Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa.

— (coord.) (2012). Filosofia e Arquitectura da Paisagem: Um Manual. Lisboa: Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa.

SIBLEY, F. (2001). «Taste, Smells, and Aesthetics». Em: Sibley, F.; Benson, J.; Redfern, B e Cox, J. R. (eds.). Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Published

2014-10-01

How to Cite

Veríssimo Serrão, A. (2014). Landscape and Environment: a conceptual distinction. Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason, 53, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.200

Downloads