Comments on 'Theoretical Explanation and ontological commitments: a structuralist model' of C. Ulises Moulines
Abstract
In this comment on the work by Ulises Moulines I shall not refer to the interesting analysisof the ontological commitments that depends the treatment of the so-called «data models», nor shall I debate the general metaphysical principles proposed in his approach,adopting an experimentalist, instrumentalist, anti-realistic, positivist or empirical stance. Ishall focus on the last part of his article in which he elaborates on the links between WesleySalmon’s causalist approach and the structuralist analysis of explanation viewed as theoreticalsubsumption, as he relates it to the structural analysis of the theoretical terms inlight of a certain general shared understanding of the job of epistemology.Keywords
explanation, structuralism, ontological commitment, theoretical subsumption, models.Published
2005-07-07
How to Cite
Lorenzano, P. (2005). Comments on ’Theoretical Explanation and ontological commitments: a structuralist model’ of C. Ulises Moulines. Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason, 37, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.351
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2005 Pablo Lorenzano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.