Redes bimodales para analizar repertorios de contienda: La transferibilidad de las formas de protesta en España en tiempos de austeridad

Alejandro Ciordia Morandeira; Martín Portos García

doi:10.5565/rev/redes.1036

Redes bimodales para analizar repertorios de contienda

La transferibilidad de las formas de protesta en España en tiempos de austeridad

Autores

Alejandro Ciordia Morandeira Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-924X
Martín Portos García https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1714-6383

PDF (ES)

Resumo

Los análisis empíricos de los repertorios de contienda (el conjunto de formas o tácticas diferentes que emplean los actores colectivos en un territorio y periodo determinado) se han realizado tradicionalmente a través de enfoques agregativos basados únicamente en el análisis del volumen de diferentes tácticas y su distribución temporal. Este artículo implementa empíricamente por vez primera una reciente propuesta metodológica para medir de una manera más fehaciente, detallada y dinámica los repertorios de contienda a través del análisis de redes bimodales. Dicha propuesta se basa en la operacionalización del concepto de “modularidad táctica” (esto es, la transferibilidad de las formas de protesta a diferentes circunstancias de la contienda) a través de la métrica de centralidad de grado ponderada. Haciendo uso de una completa base de datos de 1.582 eventos de protesta en España, se explora la evolución del repertorio de contienda durante el ciclo de protesta anti-austeridad entre 2007 y principios de 2015. En congruencia con las teorías de ciclos de contienda, los resultados muestran una notable flexibilización global del repertorio de contienda durante el pico del ciclo (2011-13), debido principalmente a la creciente transferibilidad de las ocupaciones de espacios públicos primero y las protestas simbólicas después.

Palavras-chave

Repertórios de contenção, Análise de eventos de protesto, Ciclos de protesto, Redes políticas multimodais, Centralidade de grau ponderada

Referências

Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., y Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(11), 3747–3752. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400087101

Bearman, P. S., y Everett, K. D. (1993). The structure of social protest, 1961–1983. Social Networks, 15(2), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(93)90004-5

Bojar, A., Gessler, T., Hutter, S., y Kriesi, H. (Eds.). (2021). Contentious Episodes in the Age of Austerity: Studying the Dynamics of Government–Challenger Interactions. Cambridge University Press.

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., y Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Brandes, U., Kenis, P., y Raab, J. (2005). La explicación a través de la visualización de redes. Redes, 9, 6. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.75

Brandes, U., Raab, J., y Wagner, D. (2001). Exploratory Network Visualization: Simultaneous Display of Actor Status and Connections. Journal of Social Structure, 2(4). http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/5903

Calhoun, C. (1993). “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century. Social Science History, 17(3), 385–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200018642

Ciordia, A. (2021). Less divided after ETA? The evolution of ideological cleavages in the Basque environmental field, 2007-2017. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 26 (2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-26-2-217

Ciordia, A., y Letamendia, A. (2021). Using Social Network Analysis to study the Modularity of Protest Forms: The evolution of the Basque Repertoire of Contention (1980- 2014). Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 52, 53-95. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.52.2021.31365

Diani, M., y Kousis, M. (2014). The Duality of Claims and Events: The Greek Campaign Against the Troika’s Memoranda and Austerity, 2010-2012. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.19.4.d865w28177575673

Doherty, B., y Hayes, G. (2019). Tactics and Strategic Action. En D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, y H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (2nd ed., pp. 271–288). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Earl, J., Martin, A., McCarthy, J. D., y Soule, S. A. (2004). The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110603

Fernández Albertos, J. (2015). Los votantes de Podemos: Del partido de los indignados al partido de los excluidos. Madrid: Catarata.

Fisher, D. R., Andrews, K. T., Caren, N., Chenoweth, E., Heaney, M. T., Leung, T., Perkins, L. N., y Pressman, J. (2019). The science of contemporary street protest: New efforts in the United States. Science Advances, 5(10), eaaw5461. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw5461

Flesher Fominaya, C. (2014). Social Movements and Globalization: How protests, occupations and uprisings are changing the world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Flesher Fominaya, C. (2020). Democracy Reloaded: Inside Spain’s Political Laboratory from 15-M to Podemos. New York: Oxford University Press.

Franzosi, R. (1987). The Press as a Source of Socio-Historical Data: Issues in the Methodology of Data Collection from Newspapers. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 20(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.1987.10594173

Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

Girvan, M., y Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821–7826. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799

Gold, T. (2022). Contentious Tactics as Jazz Performances: A Pragmatist Approach to the Study of Repertoire Change. Sociological Theory, 40(3), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751221110625

Hanneman, R. A., y Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/Introduction_to_Social_Network_Methods.pdf

Hutter, S. (2014). Protest event analysis and its offspring. En D. della Porta (Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research (pp. 335–367). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knoke, D., Diani, M., Hollway, J., y Christopoulos, D. (2021). Multimodal Political Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koopmans, R., y Rucht, D. (2002). Protest Event Analysis. En B. Klandermans y S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of Social Movement Research (pp. 231–259). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Kriesi, H., Hutter, S., y Bojar, A. (2019). Contentious episode analysis. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 24(3), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-24-3-251

Kriesi, H., Lorenzini, J., Wüest, B., y Hausermann, S. (2020). Contention in Times of Crisis: Recession and Political Protest in Thirty European Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, J., y Lomi, A. (2023). Relational hyperevent models for polyadic interaction networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 186(3), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnac012

Letamendia, A. (2017). Towards the Aestheticisation of the Resistances in the Digital Age? A Critical Approach. En B. Heidkamp y D.

Kergel (Eds.), Precarity within the Digital Age (pp. 135–149). Wiestbaden: Springer.

Meyer, D., y Tarrow, S. (Eds.). (1998). The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Mooney, P. H., y Hunt, S. A. (1996). A Repertoire of Interpretations: Master Frames and Ideological Continuity in U.S. Agrarian Mobilization. The Sociological Quarterly, 37(1), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb02336.x

Mueller, C. (1997). Media Measurement Models of Protest Event Data. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.2.2.n043476m01q7463u

Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103

Oliver, P., Hanna, A., y Lim, C. (2023). Constructing relational and verifiable protest event data: Four challenges and some solutions. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-28-1-1

Opsahl, T. (2020). tnet: Weighted, Two-Mode, and Longitudinal Networks Analysis (3.0.16) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tnet

Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., y Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006

Pirro, A. L., Pavan, E., Fagan, A., y Gazsi, D. (2021). Close ever, distant never? Integrating protest event and social network approaches into the transformation of the Hungarian far right. Party Politics, 27(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819863624

Portos, M. (2016). Movilización social en tiempos de recesión: Un análisis de eventos de protesta en España, 2007-2015. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 41, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.41.07

Portos, M. (2019). Keeping dissent alive under the Great Recession: No-radicalisation and protest in Spain after the eventful 15M/indignados campaign. Acta Politica, 54(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0074-9

Portos, M. (2021). Grievances and Public Protests: Political Mobilisation in Spain in the Age of Austerity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Portos, M., y Masullo, J. (2017). Voicing Outrage Unevenly. Democratic Dissatisfaction, Nonparticipation, and Participation Frequency in the 15-M Campaign. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 22(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-2-201

Ring-Ramirez, M., Reynolds-Stenson, H., y Earl, J. (2014). Culturally Constrained Contention: Mapping the Meaning Structure of the Repertoire of Contention. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.19.4.d972218lu6826510

Romanos, E. (2016). Late Neoliberalism and Its Indignados: Contention in Austerity Spain. En D. Della Porta, M. Andretta, T. Fernandes, F. O’Connor, E. Romanos, y M. Vogiatzoglou (Eds.), Late Neoliberalism and its Discontents in the Economic Crisis: Comparing Social Movements in the European Periphery (pp. 131–167). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Romanos, E., y Sadaba, I. (2022). Evolución de la protesta en España (2000-2017): Un análisis de sus ciclos y características. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 177, 89–110. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.177.89

Rootes, C. (Ed.). (2003). Environmental Protest in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rucht, D., y Ohlemacher, T. (1992). Protest Event Data: Collection, Uses and Perspectives. En M. Diani y R. Eyerman (Eds.), Studying Collective Action (pp. 76–106). London: SAGE Publications.

Said, A. (2020). The Rise and Fall of the Tahrir Repertoire: Theorizing Temporality, Trajectory, and Failure. Social Problems, spaa024. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa024

Smith, J. A., Moody, J., y Morgan, J. H. (2017). Network sampling coverage II: The effect of non-random missing data on network measurement. Social Networks, 48, 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.005

Snow, D. A., y Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris y C. McClurg. edt. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 133–155). Yale University Press.

Steuer, C. (2018). The modularity of the ‘revolutionary’ repertoire of action in Egypt: Origins and appropriation by different players. Social Movement Studies, 17(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1377602

Tarrow, S. (1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965-1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Tarrow, S. (1993). Modular Collective Action and the Rise of the Social Movement: Why the French Revolution was Not Enough. Politics y Society, 21(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329293021001004

Tarrow, S. (2022). Power in Movement (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tejerina, B., Perugorría, I., Benski, T., y Langman, L. (2013). From indignation to occupation: A new wave of global mobilization. Current Sociology, 61(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479738

Tilly, C. (1976). Major forms of collective action in western Europe 1500–1975. Theory and Society, 3(3), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159492

Tilly, C. (1977). Getting it Together in Burgundy, 1675-1975. Theory and Society, 4(4), 479–504. https://www.jstor.org/stable/656865

Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York: Random House.

Tilly, C. (1979). Repertoires of contention in America and Britain, 1750-1820. En M. Zald y J. D. McCarthy (Eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements (pp. 126–155). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

Tilly, C. (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. London: Routledge.

Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C., Castañeda, E., y Wood, L. J. (2020). Social Movements, 1768—2018 (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Traugott, M. (Ed.). (1995). Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Wada, T. (2012). Modularity and Transferability of Repertoires of Contention. Social Problems, 59(4), 544–571. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2012.59.4.544

Wada, T. (2016). Rigidity and flexibility of repertoires of contention. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21(4), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-21-4-449

Wada, T. (2023). Repertoires of Contention across Latin America. En F. M. Rossi (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Social Movements (p. 660–677). New York: Oxford University Press.

Wang, D. J., y Soule, S. A. (2012). Social Movement Organizational Collaboration: Networks of Learning and the Diffusion of Protest Tactics, 1960–1995. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1674–1722. https://doi.org/10.1086/664685

Wang, D. J., y Soule, S. A. (2016). Tactical Innovation in Social Movements: The Effects of Peripheral and Multi-Issue Protest. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 517–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416644414

Zeballos Puccherelli, M. C., y Weise, G. (2024). Red de política contenciosa en Bolivia. Proyección de grafos bipartitos en datos de conflicto social de 2010 a 2020. Redes, 35(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.993

Zolberg, A. R. (1972). Moments of Madness. Politics & Society, 2(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232927200200203