Red de coautoría de investigadores de Ciencias Políticas en México
Resumen
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. y Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?, Higher Education, 57 (2) pp. 155-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z
Aguado-López, E., Rogel-Salazar, R., Garduño-Oropeza, G., Becerril-García, A., Zúñiga-Roca, M. y Velázquez-Álvarez, A. (2009). Patrones de colaboración científica a partir de redes de coautoría. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 16.
Aghakhani, N., Lagzian, F. y Hazarika, B. (2013). The role of personal digital library in supporting research collaboration. Electronic Library, 31 (5), 548-560. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2011-0005
Albert, R. y Barabási, A.L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74 (1), 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
Badar, K., Hite, J. y Badir, Y. (2014). The moderating roles of academic age and institutional sector on the relationship between co-authorship network centrality and academic research performance. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66 (1), 38 – 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2013-0040
Badar, K., Frantz, T. y Jabeen, M. (2016). Research performance and degree centrality in co-authorship networks. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68 (6), 756 – 771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-07-2016-0103
Baker, D. (2014). The Schooled Society: The Educational Transformation of Global Culture. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.), 15(3), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x
Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B. y Díaz-Faes, A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields. Journal of Informetrics, 9 (1), 135-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001
Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes – The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Ferligoj, A., Miguel, S., Kronegger, L. y Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). Blockmodeling of co-authorship networks in library and information science in Argentina: a case study. Scientometrics, 93(3), 699-717. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0794-6
Coccia, M. y Wang, L. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(8), 2057-2061. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510820113
Conacyt (2014). Tecnología e Innovación 2014-2018. CONACYT (Vol. 409778). DOF.
Conacyt. (2016). Comité de Investigadores Eméritos. Recuperado de: https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/sistema-nacional-de-investigadores/otros/marco-legal-sni/criterios-sni/14313-criterios-de-evaluacion-para-investigadores-nacionales-emeritos/file
Conacyt. (2017). Resultados del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI). Recuperado de: https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/sni/convocatorias-conacyt/convocatorias-sistema-nacional-de-investigadores-sni/resultados-sni-1
Conacyt. (2020). Criterios Específicos de Evaluación. Recuperado de: https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/sistema-nacional-de-investigadores/otros/marco-legal-sni/criterios-sni/13718-criterios-especificos-av/file
Corley, E. y Sabharwal, M. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends. Public Administration, 88(3), 627-648, DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01830.x
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
Cugmas, M., Ferligoj, A. y Kronegger, L. (2016). The stability of co-authorship structures. Scientometrics, 106(1), 163-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1790-4
De Stefano, D., Fuccella, V., Prosperina, M. y Zaccarin, S. (2013). The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance. Social Networks, 35, 370– 381. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.004
Ductor, L. (2015). Does co‐authorship lead to higher academic productivity?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(3), 385-407. DOI: 10.1111/obes.12070
Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239, DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
Glanzel, W. y Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through coauthorship. In: Moed, H., Glanzel, W., Schmoch, U. (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12
Gonzalez-Brambila, C. (2014). Social capital in academia. Scientometrics, 101 (3), 1609-1625. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1424-2
Goyal, S., Van der Leij, M. y Moraga-Gonzalez, J. (2006). Economics: An Emerging Small World. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 403–412. DOI: 10.1086/500990
Hage, P. y Harary, F. (1983). Structural Models in Anthropology. Cambridge: University Press.
Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980- 2013). Scientometrics, 107(2), 455-476. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x
Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., y Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 322(5905), 1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357
Kronegger, L., Ferligoj, A. y Doreian, P. (2011). On the dynamics of national scientific systems. Quality & Quantity 45, 989–1015. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-011-9484-3.
Lee, S. y Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Li, E., Liao, C. y Yen, H. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: a social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42 (9), 1515-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
Liberman, S. y Wolf, K. (2010). Bonding number in scientific disciplines. Social Networks, 20, 239–246. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00003-3.
Lopaciuk-Gonczaryk, B. (2016). Collaboration strategies for publishing articles in international journals–A study of Polish scientists in economics. Social Networks, 44, 50-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.001
Milgram, S. (1967). The Small-World Problem. Psychology Today, 1 (1), May 1967, 61‐67.
Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69 (2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900204
Munoz, D., Queupil, J. y Fraser, P. (2016). Assessing collaboration networks in educational research. International Journal of Educational Management, 30 (3), 416 – 436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2014-0154
Newman, M. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98 (2), 404-409. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
Newman, M. (2004a). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (1), 5200-5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
Newman, M. (2004b). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. Complex Networks, 650, 337-370. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132
Nieminen, J. (1974). On centrality in a graph. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 15:322-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1974.tb00598.x
Ossenblok, T., Verleysen, F. y Engels, T. (2014). Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000–2010). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 882-897. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23015.
Ozel, B. (2012a). Collaboration structure and knowledge diffusion in Turkish management academia. Scientometrics, 1(93), 183-206. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0641-9
Ozel, B. (2012b). Individual cognitive structures and collaboration patterns in academia. Scientometrics, 91(2), 539-555. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0624-x
Tsai, C. C., Corley, E. A., y Bozeman, B. (2016). Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts. Scientometrics, 108(2), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1997-z
Tang, L. y Walsh, J.P. (2010). Bibliometric fingerprints: name disambiguation based on approximate structure equivalence of cognitive maps. Scientometrics, 84 (3), 763-784.
Teele, D. L. y Thelen, K. (2017). Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 433-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002985
Watts, D. y Strogatz, S. (1998). The small world problem. Collective dynamics of small world networks. Nature, 393, 440–442. DOI: 10.1038/30918
Ye, Q., Li, T. y Law, R. (2013). A co-authorship network analysis of tourism and hospitality research collaboration. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 37, (1), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1096348011425500.
Métricas de artículo
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM