The Romance Subjunctive Schema. Grammaticalisations and Constructionalisations in a Comparative CxG Analysis of Spanish, Catalan, French, and Italian
Abstract
This article applies the principles of Construction Grammar (CxG) to the problem of describing the various subjunctive-constructions in the Romance languages. Departing from a very basic mother construction, all other uses are derived from it via the concept of constructionalisation (c.f. Traugott & Trousdale 2013). The description thus takes the form of a cognitive network that can be represented as a graphic in which all ramifications are represented in a way that allows a synoptic vision of all subjunctive schemas of a given language. These charts are then used for a comparison between various Romance languages. The most important difference appears to be the development of the Honorific-Imperative Construction in all those languages that have developed a formal address-system based on morphologically 3rd person pronouns (Vd., você, vostè); in these languages, morphological subjunctives have given rise to a whole new paradigm of “neo-imperatives”.
Keywords
constructionalisation, demodalisation, insubordination, modal agreement, neo-imperatives, Romance subjunctive constructions, subordination markerReferences
Baldinger, Kurt. 1968. Post- und Prädeterminierung im Französischen. In Baldinger, Kurt (ed.). FS Walther von Wartburg zum 80. Geburtstag, 87-106. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Becker, Martin. 2010a. Mood in Portuguese. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.). Mood in the Languages of Europe, 179-196. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.10bec
Becker, Martin. 2010b. Mood in Rumanian. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.). Mood in the Languages of Europe, 251-269. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.14bec
Becker, Martin. 2014. Welten in Sprache. Zur Entwicklung der Kategorie «Modus» in romanischen Sprachen. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110342833
Blaikner-Hohenwart, Gabriele. 2006. Der subjonctif als ‘gefrorene Morphosyntax’? Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 122: 613-623. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZRPH.2006.613
Bosque, Ignacio (ed.). 1990. Indicativo y subjuntivo. Madrid: Taurus Universitaria.
Brugman, Claudia. 1988. The Story of ‘Over’, polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland Press.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1976. Das romanische Verbalsystem. Tübingen: Narr.
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. An overview of construction grammars. In Cognitive Linguistics, 257-290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864.011
De Bruyne, Jacques. 1993. Spanische Grammatik, übersetzt von Dirko-J. Gütschko. Tübingen: Niemeyer (= Spaanse Spraakkunst, Kappelen (Belgien). Uitgeverij De Sikkel, 1979).
De Knop, Sabine & Mollica, Fabio. 2013. Die Konstruktionsgrammatik für die Beschreibung romanischer Sprachen. In Konstruktionsgrammatik in den romanischen Sprachen, 9-23. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03754-8
De Mulder, Walter. 2010. Mood in French. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.). Mood in the Languages of Europe, 157-178. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.09dem
Dietrich, Wolf. 1981. Actualité et inactualité de l’action: les fonctions modales dans le système verbal des langues romanes. In In honorem E. Coseriu, 395-416. Madrid: Gredos. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863031-034
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.). Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366-431. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011
Fernández-Serrano, Irene. 2016. El subjuntivo como concordancia modal. Nueva propuesta teórica y bases para su aplicación didáctica [Thesis for: Grado en Estudios de Inglés y Español]. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Gebhardt, Heidemarie. 1979. Modus und Pragmatik: Untersuchungen zum Gebrauch des Konjunktivs im Spanischen. In Bergerfurth, Wolfgang (ed.). Festschrift Rupprecht Rohr zum 60, 169-181. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Green, John N. 1988. Spanish. In Harris, Martin & Vincent, Nigel (eds.). The Romance Languages, 79-130. London/Sydney: Croom Helm.
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Gsell, Otto & Wandruszka, Ulrich. 1986. Der romanische Konjunktiv. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111372891
Haßler, Gerda. 2016. Temporalität, Aspektualität und Modalität in romanischen Sprachen. New York/Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312997
Harris, Martin. 1974. The subjunctive mood as a changing category in Romance. In Anderson, John M. & Jones, Charles (eds.). Historical linguistics, Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics, vol. 2, 169-88. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Hummel, Martin. 2001. Der Grundwert des spanischen Subjunktivs. Tübingen: Narr.
Hummel, Martin. 2012. Einzelaspekt: Modus. In Born, Joachim et al. (eds.). Handbuch Spanisch, 324-329. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
Hundertmark-Santos Martins, Maria Teresa. 1998. Portugiesische Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Laca, Brenda. 2010. Mood in Spanish. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.). Mood in the Languages of Europe, 198-220. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.11lac
Lakoff, George. 1987. Radial categories. In Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, Part I: Categories and cognitive models, chapter 6, 91-114. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lindschouw, Jan. 2010. Grammaticalization and language comparison in the Romance mood system. In Becker, Martin G. & Remberger, Eva-Maria (eds.). Modality & Mood in Romance. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110234343.2.181
Noonan, Michael. 2008. Complementation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.). Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.002
Pérez Saldanya, Manuel. 1988. Els sistemes modals d’indicatiu i de subjuntiu. València: Institut de Filologia Valenciana/Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.
Posner, Rebecca. 1996. The Romance Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quer, Josep. 2010. Mood in Catalan. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.). Mood in the Languages of Europe. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.12que
Radatz, Hans-Ingo. 2010. Das Mallorquinische: gesprochenes Katalanisch auf Mallorca, deskriptive, typologische und soziolinguistische Aspekte. Aachen: Shaker.
Radatz, Hans-Ingo. 2023. On Deconstructing Mood: A Construction Grammar Approach to the Spanish Subjunctive. In Hennecke, Inga & Wiesinger, Evelyn (eds.). Constructions in Spanish, 156-192. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.34.07rad
Riegel, Martin, Pellat, Jean-Christophe & Rioul, René. 2018. Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.
Ruiz Campillo, José Plácido. 2008. El valor central del subjuntivo: ¿informatividad o declaratividad? MarcoELE - revista de didáctica ELE 7: 1-44.
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte. 1971. Okzitanische und katalanische Verbprobleme Ein Beitrag zur funktionellen und synchronischen Untersuchung des Verbalsystems der beiden Sprachen (Tempus und Aspekt). Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111626444
Schuepbach, Doris et al. 2007. A cross-linguistic comparison of address pronoun use in four European languages: Intralingual and interlingual dimensions. In Mushin, Ilana & Laughren, Mary (eds.). Selected papers from the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:13126
Squartini, Mario. 2010. Mood in Italian. In Rothstein, Björn & Thieroff, Rolf (eds.). Mood in the Languages of Europe, 237-250. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.120.13squ
Takagaki, Toshihiro. 1984. Subjunctive as the marker of subordination. Hispania 67(2): 248-256. https://doi.org/10.2307/341735
Terrell, Tracy & Hooper, Joan B. 1974. A semantically based analysis of mood in Spanish. Hispania 62: 484-494. https://doi.org/10.2307/339187
Thieroff, Rolf. 2004. Modale Tempora – non-modale Modi. Zu Bedeutung und Gebrauch inhärenter Verbalkategorien in verschiedenen europäischen Sprachen. In Leirbukt, Oddleif (ed.). Tempus / Temporalität und Modus / Modalität im Sprachenvergleich, 63-85. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2012. Pragmatics and language change. In Allan, Keith & Jaszczolt, Kathia M. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, 549-566. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.030
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
Wandruszka, Ulrich. 2000. Über die Bedeutung des romanischen Konjunktivs und die Geburt des Nebensatzes. In Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 116(1): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.2000.116.1.56
Ziem, Alexander & Lasch, Alexander. 2013. Konstruktionsgrammatik, Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsbasierter Ansätze. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295641
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Hans-Ingo Radatz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
