Robustez en las redes de gobernanza colaborativa e implicaciones para la conservación del paisaje en el Mosaico do Espinhaço, Brasil
Resumen
El artículo analiza las propiedades estructurales y la robustez de una red de gobernanza colaborativa (n= 230) que opera en una iniciativa de conservación a gran escala en Brasil para probar el mantenimiento de las funciones de la red a lo largo del tiempo. Examinamos la robustez de la red después de eliminaciones aleatorias y dirigidas que simulan cambios socioambientales en esa iniciativa de conservación. Nuestro análisis, apoyado también en datos empíricos longitudinales de rotación de actores, indica que la red de gobernanza es altamente robusta a las pruebas realizadas, pues parece poco probable que niveles razonables de salida de actores causen una fragmentación significativa de la misma. Sin embargo, la red es más vulnerable a la remoción de los actores más centrales y de aquellos especialmente importantes en la gestión de los recursos naturales que a la eliminación aleatoria de parte de sus miembros, lo que evidencia el protagonismo de estos actores en la articulación de la red y mantenimiento del proceso de gobernanza. Los procedimientos metodológicos utilizados permiten identificar vulnerabilidades potenciales de las redes de gobernanza a diferentes perturbaciones y respaldar planes de conservación a escala del paisaje y a largo plazo.
Palabras clave
Colaboración, Áreas protegidas, Gestión integrada del paisaje, Robustez, Análisis de redes socialesCitas
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000). Error & attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019
Alexander, S. M., Andrachuk, M., & Armitage, D. (2016). Navigating governance networks for community-based Conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1251
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00610-090118
Baggio, J. A, BurnSilver, S. B., Arenas, A., Magdanz, J. S., Kofinasd, G. P., & Domenico, M. D. (2016). Multiplex social ecological network analysis reveals how social changes affect community robustness more than resource depletion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13708-13713. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160440111
Barabási, A.-L. (2014). Network Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Beilin, R., Reichelt, N. T., King, B. J., Long, A., & Cam, S. (2013). Transition landscapes and social networks: examining on-ground community resilience and its implications for policy settings in multiscalar systems. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05360-180230
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692-1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
Bixler, R. P., Johnson, S., Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Reuling, M., Curtin, C. et al. (2016). Networks and landscapes: a framework for setting goals and evaluating performance at the large landscape scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1250
Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. (2008). Management of Natural Resources at the Community Level: Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Leadership in a Rural Fishing Community. World Development, 36(12), 2763-2779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.002
Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance. What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2017). Las redes sociales en la gestión de los recursos naturales: ¿Qué hay que aprender de una perspectiva estructural? Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 28(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.684
Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Needham, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., & Hill, R. (2015). Governance for the conservation of nature. In G. L. Worboys, M. Lockwood, A. Kothari, S.
Feary & I. Pulsford (Eds.), Protected area governance and management (pp. 169-206). Camberra: ANU Press.
Burgos, A., & Mertens, F. (2017). Participatory management of community-based tourism: A network perspective. Community Development, 48(4), 546-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2017.1344996
Burgos, A., & Mertens, F. (2022). Collaborative governance networks: exploring governance success in large-scale conservation. Ambiente & Sociedade, 25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20220110L5OA
Carlsson, L. G., & Sandström, A. C. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 33-54. http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.20
Cumming, G. S. (2017). A Review of Social Dilemmas and Social-Ecological Traps in Conservation and Natural Resource Management. Conservation Letters, 00(0), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12376
Dezső, Z., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Halting viruses in scale-free networks. Physical Review Journals, 65(5), 055103(R). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.055103
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., &. Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Groce, J. E., Farrelly, M. A., Jorgensen, B. S., & Cook, C. N. (2019). Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 33(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13127
Guerrero, A. M., McAllister, R. R. J., & Wilson, K. A. (2015). Achieving Cross-Scale Collaboration for Large Scale Conservation Initiatives. Conservation Letters, 8(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12112
Guerrero, A. M., Barnes, M., Bodin, Ö., Chadès, I., Davis, K. J., Iftekhar, M. S. et al. (2020). Key considerations and challenges in the application of social‐network research for environmental decision making. Conservation Biology, 34(3), 733-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13461
Hanneman, R. A., Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.
IBGE. (2022). Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática – SIDRA. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/
ICMBio. (2022). Unidades nos Biomas. Consulta [23/11/2022] https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/unidade-de-conservacao/unidades-de-biomas
IEF. (2022). Unidades de Conservação. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.ief.mg.gov.br/unidades-de-conservacao
Kark, S., Tulloch, A., Gordon, A., Mazor, T., Bunnefeld, N., & Levin, N. (2015). Cross-boundary collaboration: key to the conservation puzzle. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSUST.2014.08.005
Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1):19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01606-110119
Lindenmayer, D., & Burgman, M. (2005). Practical Conservation Biology. Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
Lockwood, M. (2010). Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(3), 754-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005
Mardones, G. (2017). Análisis de redes sociales para la gobernanza de un área protegida y su zona de amortiguación en el bosque templado del sur de Chile. Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 28(1), 61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.690
Mathevet, R., Thompson, J. D., Folke, C., & Chapin, F. S. (2016). Protected areas and their surrounding territory: social-ecological systems in the context of ecological solidarity. Ecological Applications, 26, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0421
McKinney, M., Scarlett, L., & Kemmis, D. (2010). Large landscape conservation: a strategic framework for policy and action. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
Mertens, F., Saint-Charles, J., Luccote, M., & Mergler, D. (2008). Emergence and robustness of a community discussion network on mercury contamination and health in the Brazilian Amazon. Health Education & Behavior, 35(4), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198108320357
Mertens, F., Távora, R., Fonseca, I. F., Grando, R., Castro, M., & Demeda, K. (2011). Redes sociais, capital social e governança ambiental no Território Portal da Amazônia. Acta Amazônica, 41(4), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672011000400006
Mertens, F., Fillion, M., Saint-Charles, J., Mongeau, P., Távora, R., Passos, C. J., & Mergler, D. (2015). The role of strong-tie social networks in mediating food security of fish resources by a traditional riverine community in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07483-200318
Mittermeier, R. A., Gil, P. R., Hoffman, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G. et al. (2005). Hotspots revisited: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
MMA. (2000). Lei nº 9.985 de 18 de julho de 2000. Regulamenta o art. 225 parágrafo 1º, incisos I, II, III, e IV da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação - SNUC. Brasília: MMA. Consulta [23/11/2022] https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9985.htm
MMA. (2010). Portaria 444 de 26 de novembro de 2010. Reconhece o Mosaico de unidades de conservação do Espinhaço: Alto Jequitinhonha – Serra do Cabral. Brasília: MMA. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.ibama.gov.br/sophia/cnia/legislacao/MMA/PT0444-261110.PDF
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Olson, M. (2001). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Boston: Harvard University Press.
RBRB. (2022). Reserva da Biosfera da Serra do Espinhaço. Consulta [23/11/2022] https://reservasdabiosfera.org.br/a-rbrb/
Scarlett, L., & McKinney, M. (2016). Connecting people and places: the emerging role of network governance in large landscape conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1247
Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis. A Handbook. London, UK: Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529716597
SEGRH. (2022). Bacia hidrográfica do Rio Jequitinhonha. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.igam.mg.gov.br/component/content/160?task=view
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1999). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Webb, C., & Bodin, Ö. (2008). A network perspective on modularity and control of flow in robust systems. In J. Norberg, & G. S. Cumming. (Eds.), Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 85-118). New York: Columbia Press.
Worboys, G. L., Francis, W. L., & Lockwood, M. (2010). Connectivity Conservation Management: A global guide. London: Earthscan.
Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., Kothari, A., Feary, S., & Pulsford, I. (Eds.). (2015). Protected Area Governance and Management. Canberra: ANU Press.
Wyborn, R., & Bixler, P. (2013). Collaboration and nested environmental governance: Scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 123, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.014
Publicado
Cómo citar
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2023 Andrés Burgos, Frédéric Mertens
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
