Situando el valor de los servicios ecosistémicos en el Paraguay rural


  • Martín Barranco blasco Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona Stockholm University


Este artículo se centra en adscripciones de valor a servicios ecosistémicos en el Paraguay rural. El estudio se desarrolla desde datos primarios obtenidos a través de trabajo de campo en el departamento de San Pedro, Paraguay. El artículo pone en cuestión la devaluación de servicios ecosistémicos incluyendo la perspectiva de pequeños agricultores. Las transiciones de la agricultura familiar tradicional hacia la agricultura industrial se contextualizan en paisajes y patrones socio-culturales cambiantes.

Palabras clave

Paraguay, Smallholders, Ecosystem services, Traditional knowledge, Soy, Agriculture, Development


Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and change, 26(3), 413-439.

Altieri, M. A. (2004). Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(1), 35-42.[0035:leatfi];2

Ango, T. G., Börjeson, L., Senbeta, F., & Hylander, K. (2014). Balancing ecosystem services and disservices: smallholder farmers’ use and management of forest and trees in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Ethiopia. Ecology and Society, 19(1).

Callicott, J. B., Crowder, L. B., & Mumford, K. (1999). Current normative concepts in conservation. Conservation biology, 13(1), 22-35.

Chan, K. M., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological economics, 74, 8-18.

Corrigan, C., & Hay-Edie, T. (2013). A toolkit to support conservation by indigenous peoples and local communities: building capacity and sharing knowledge for indigenous peoples’ and community conserved territories and areas (ICCAs). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.

Daily, G. C. (1997). Introduction: what are ecosystem services. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, 1(1).

Da Ponte, E., Kuenzer, C., Parker, A., Rodas, O., Oppelt, N., & Fleckenstein, M. (2017). Forest cover loss in Paraguay and perception of ecosystem services: A case study of the Upper Parana Forest. Ecosystem Services, 24, 200-212.

De Groot, R., Brander, L., Van Der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., ... & Hussain, S. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem services, 1(1), 50-61.

Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., ... & Zlatanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework—connecting nature and people. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 14, 1-16.

Fleytas, M. C. (2007). Cambios en el paisaje: evolución de la cobertura vegetal en la Región Oriental del Paraguay. Biodiversidad del Paraguay: Una aproximación a sus realidades. Asunción: Fundación Moisés Bertoni, 77-87.

Huang, C., Kim, S., Song, K., Townshend, J. R., Davis, P., Altstatt, A., ... & Musinsky, J. (2009). Assessment of Paraguay's forest cover change using Landsat observations. Global and Planetary Change, 67(1-2), 1-12.

Krieger, D. J. (2001). Economic value of forest ecosystem services: a review.

Lambert, P. (2016) History of Paraguay. In: South Amaerica, Central America and the Caribbean 2016. Routledge, pp. 738-40.

Ludwig, D. (2000). Limitations of economic valuation of ecosystems. Ecosystems, 3(1), 31-35.

Menzel, S., & Teng, J. (2010). Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 907-909.

Nauber, J; Paulsch, A. (Eds.). (2015). International Workshop on diverse Knowledge Systems in IPBES. Ed. Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN). Bonn, Germany.

Oliver, D. M., Fish, R. D., Winter, M., Hodgson, C. J., Heathwaite, A. L., & Chadwick, D. R. (2012). Valuing local knowledge as a source of expert data: farmer engagement and the design of decision support systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 76-85.

Pavetti, A., & Saito, O. (2012). Changes in Land Use and Ecosystem Services in Paraguay. 環境システム研究論文発表会講演集, 40, 331-337.

Reyes-García, V. (2007). El conocimiento tradicional para la resolución de problemas ecológicos contemporáneos. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global, 100, 109-116.

Robbins, P. (2019). Political ecology: A critical introduction. John Wiley & Sons.

Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. Ambio, 43(5), 579-591.

Xiao, H., Ouyang, Z., Zhao, J., & Wang, X. (2000). Forest ecosystem services and their ecological valuation--a case study of tropical forest in Jianfengling of Hainan Island. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao= The journal of applied ecology, 11(4), 481-484.

Other references

Convention on Biological Biodiversity (2016). Strategy and Action Plan-Parguay.

IPBES/5/INF/24 (2017). Update on the classification on nature’s contributions to people by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Report of the Executive Secretary on the implementation of the work programmme for the period 2014-2018.

Law nº 2524 (2004). “Of prohibition in the Eastern Region of the activities transforming and conversion of surfaces with forest cover”.

NEPCon (2017). Soy Risk Assessment. Paraguay. Version 1.2.

Nickson, R. A. (2013). Paraguay: Brazil's dirty little secret.




Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.