Clitics, DOM and ellipsis

An experimental comparative study in three dialects of Spanish

Authors

  • Samara Almeida
  • Francisco Ordoñez Stony Brook University (SUNY)

Abstract

This paper discusses the correlation between clitics, DOM and ellipsis in Spanish. As observed by Cyrino & Ordóñez (2018), strict and sloppy readings can be obtained in both TP ellipsis and argument ellipsis with clitics. However, DOM animate antecedents severely limit the availability of sloppy readings in argument ellipsis with clitics. This is a new observation, and judgments about the lack of sloppy readings is often delicate. We carried out an experimental study in order to confirm the data reported in Cyrino & Ordóñez (2018). We also wanted to test whether this distinction applied to speakers of three different dialects of Spanish where distribution of clitics and doubling differs. The results show a significant statistical anti animacy effect for obtaining sloppy readings with clitics. This effect is not found with TP ellipsis. In this paper we propose a syntactic approach to account for such effect with clitics. We propose that clitics contain an empty doubled (see also Bošković 2018). We propose an analysis based on the idea that DOM objects are moved out of the vP and that the doubled DOM KP undergoes vehicle change to become a pronoun in the case of argument ellipsis.

Keywords

clitics, DOM, ellipsis, argument ellipsis, Spanish dialects, vehicle change, experimental syntax

References

Bošković, Željko. 2018. On pronouns, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: argument ellipsis as predicate ellipsis. English Linguistics, 35(1): 1-37.

Cyrino, Sonia. 2017. On animacy restrictions for the null object in Brazilian Portuguese. In L. Hellan, A. Malchukov & M. Cennamo (eds.), Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency, 279-298. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Cyrino, Sonia, & Francisco Ordóñez. 2018. Null objects in Brazilian Portuguese and DOM in Spanish: similarities and differences. In T. Parodi (ed.), Proceedings of the VIII Nereus International Workshop “Referential Properties of the Romance DP in the Context of Multilingualism”, 103-120. Arbeitspapier 129. Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz 2018.

Elbourne, Paul. 2013. Definite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fiengo, Robert, & Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Hankamer, Jorge, & Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and Surface Anaphor. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(3): 391-428.

López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Ordóñez, Francisco, & Francesc Roca. 2018. Differential Object Marking (DOM) and clitic subspecification in Catalonian Spanish. In A. Gallego (ed.), The Syntactic Variation of Spanish Dialects, 35-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Quer, Josep, & Joanna Rosselló. 2013. On sloppy readings, ellipsis and pronouns – missing arguments in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) and other argument-drop languages. In V. Camacho-Taboada, Á. L. Jiménez-Fernández, M. Reyes-Tejedor (eds.), Information structure and agreement, 337-370. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: agree and differential object marking. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.

Saab, Andrés. 2021. Gramática de los silencios. Balance y propuesta. AKAL (under contract).

Saab, Andrés, & Pablo Zdrojewski. 2012. Anti-repair effects under ellipsis: diagnosing (post)-syntactic clitics in Spanish. In Sara Lusini, Irene Franco & Andrés Saab (eds.) Romance language and linguistic theory 2010. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177-202.

Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis. Language Research

: 203-227.

Published

2024-03-12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.