When Moldovan meets Russian:  Intralinguistic variation in clitic climbing

Ștefania Costea

doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.201

When Moldovan meets Russian

Intralinguistic variation in clitic climbing

Authors

Ștefania Costea University of Cambridge https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4989-9657

PDF

Abstract

This article offers an analysis of Moldovan complex predicates, focusing on the differences between structures with aspectuals and modals. It is shown that, under the influence of Russian, a minor pattern found in old Moldovan, whereby aspectuals and embedded infinitives instantiate a monoclausal construction, was generalized. As a consequence, pronominal clitics became free to raise to the matrix aspectual predicate, since they were no longer blocked by phasal (CP) barriers. Conversely, modal predicates, which select in both Russian and Moldovan full CP-complements, do not display clitic-climbing since clitics cannot skip over phasal boundaries. Following an overview of Romance and Slavic complex predicates, Moldovan complex predicates containing both aspectual and modal verbs are analysed. In this analysis infinitival complements and subjunctive complements, which show different syntactic behaviours, especially with respect to the phenomenon of clitic-climbing, will be treated separately. Finally, the special case of Moldovan within (Daco-)Romance is discussed, since Moldovan appears to be the only variety which has started to systematically display clitic-climbing out of subjunctive clauses introduced by să.

Keywords

restructuring contexts, clitic climbing, aspectual verbs, modal verbs, language contact

References

Adams, James Noel. 1994. Wackernagel’s Law and the Position of Unstressed Pronouns in Classical Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society 92: 103–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.1994.tb00430.x

Adams, James Noel. 2013. Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843433

Alboiu, Gabriela. 2007. Moving Forward with Romanian Backward Control and Raising. In William D. Davies, & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 71), 187–211. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9_8

Atanasov, Petar. 1976. Infinitivul meglenoromân. Studii și Cercetări Lingvistice 4: 137–50.

Backus, Ad, Seza Dogruöz, & Bernd Heine. 2011. Salient stages in contact-induced grammatical change: Evidence from synchronic vs diachronic contact situations. Language Sciences 33: 738–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.02.004

Bailyn, John Frederick. 2010. To what degree are Croatian and Serbian the same language? Evidence from a translation study. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 18: 181–219. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2010.0000

Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the Low IP Area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Volume 2), 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burukina, Irina. 2019. Mandative verbs: between obligatory control and overt embedded subjects. Ms.

Čamdžić, Amela, & Richard Hudson. 2002. Serbo-Croat-Bosnian clitics and Word Grammar. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 321–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-007-0001-7

Capidan, Theodor. 1925. Meglenoromânii. Istoria și graiul lor (I). Bucharest: Cultura Națională.

Capidan, Theodor. 1932. Aromânii. Dialectul aromân. Studiu lingvistic. Bucharest: Monitorul Oficial și Imprimeriile Statului (Imprimeria Națională).

Capidan, Theodor. 1934. Dicționar meglenoromân (III). Bucharest: Monitorul Oficial și Imprimeriile Statului (Imprimeria Națională).

Cardinaletti, Anna, & Ur Shlonsky. 2004. Clitic Positions and Restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 519–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389042350523

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka, & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale. A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On Phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Oterno, & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistics Theory, 133–66. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.001.0001

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Restructuring and functional structure. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 132–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Corbeanu, Ramona Cătălina. 2020. Conjunctivul în istroromână. Statutul lui „neca”. Paper presented at Tradition and Innovation in the Study and Preservation of Istro-Romanian (Workshop), University of Bucharest, 21/11/2020.

Costea, Ștefania. 2021. Clausal de-supines in Moldovan: The State-of-the-art. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 199–210.

Cruschina, Silvio, & Adam Ledgeway. 2016. The structure of the clause. In Adam Ledgeway, & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, 556–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0031

De Angelis, Alessandro. 2017. Microvariazione, diacronia e interferenza: due case-studies dall’Italia meridionale estrema. Archivio glottologico italiano 102: 40–69.

Dragomirescu, Adina. 2013. Complex predicates. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), The Grammar of Romanian, 191–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dragomirescu, Adina, & Alexandru Nicolae. 2020. Particular features of Istro-Romanian pronominal clitics. Studia UBB Philologia 65: 147–58. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2020.4.09

Dragomirescu, Adina, & Alexandru Nicolae. 2016. Originea formelor verbale «nonfinite» cu flexiune: infinitiv vs supin. Diacronia 4: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17684/i4a54ro

Dyakonova, Marina. 2009. A phase-based approach to Russian free word order. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam: Utrecht.

Farcaș, Mircea. 2006. Infinitivul în subdialectul maramureșean. In Nicolae Saramandu, Maria Marin, & Iulia Mărgărit (eds.), Lucrările celui de al XII-lea simpozion național de dialectologie, 195–202. Cluj-Napoca: Mega.

Heine, Bernd, & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511614132

Hill, Virginia, & Gabriela Alboiu. 2016. Verb Movement and Clause Structure in Old Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736509.001.0001

Jones, Michael. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993804

Jordan, Maria. 2009. Loss of Infinitival Complementation in Romanian Diachronic Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida.

Katičić, Radoslav. 1986. Sintaksa hrvatskoga književnog jezika: Načrt za gramatiku. Zagreb: HAZU.

Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kovačević, Peda, & Tania Milićev. 2018. The nature(s) of syntactic variation: Evidence from the Serbian/Croatian dialect continuum. In Denisa Lenertová, Roland Meyer, Radek Šimík, & Luka Szucsich (eds.), Advances in formal Slavic linguistics 2016, 147–67. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390608.0010

Krapova, Iliyana, & Guglielmo Cinque. 2018. Universal Constraints on Balkanisms. A Case Study: The absence of Clitic Climbing. In Iliyana Krapova, & Brian Joseph (eds.), Balkan Syntax and (Universal) Principles of Grammar, 151–91. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375930-008

Krapova, Iliyana, & Tsvetana Dimitrova. 2016. The genitive-dative syncretism in the history of Bulgarian: towards an analysis. Studi Slavistici 12: 181–208. https://doi.org/10.13128/Studi-Slavis-17976

Krejci, Bonnie, Vera Gribanova, & Boris Harizanov. 2016. Agree-dependent A-movement and low copy pronunciation in Russian. Paper presented at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 25, Cornell University, 14/05/2016.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2000. A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Aspetti della sintassi della periferia sinistra del cosentino. In Diego Pescarini (ed.), Studi sui dialetti della Calabria, 3–24. Padua: Unipress.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2012a. From Latin to Romance. Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001

Ledgeway, Adam. 2012b. Contatto e mutamento: complementazione e complementatori nei dialetti del Salento. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teoretica e Applicata 41: 459–80.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2015. Reconstructing complementizer-drop in the dialects of the Salento: A syntactic or phonological phenomenon?. In Theresa Biberauer and George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions, 147–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0009

Ledgeway, Adam. 2016. Minunile limbii române: lecții pentru romaniști, Prima Conferință Internațională a Centrului de Studii Românești, University of Bucharest, 29/09/16–1/10/16.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2017. Late Latin Verb Second: The Sentential Word Order of the Itinerarium Egeriae. In Jaume Fontanals, & Renato Oniga (eds.), Generative Approaches to Latin Syntax, special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics 16: 163–216. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.212

Ledgeway, Adam, & Alessandra Lombardi. 2005. Verb Movement, Adverbs and Clitic Positions in Romance. Probus 17: 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.79

Marin, Maria, Iulia Mărgărit, & Victorela Neagoe. 2000 [1998]. Graiuri românești din Ucraina și Republica Moldova. In Maria Marin, Iulia Mărgărit, Victorela Neagoe, & Vasile Pavel (eds.), Cercetări asupra graiurilor românești de peste hotare, 42–119. Bucharest: Bucureștii Noi.

Matras, Yaron. 2011. Explaining convergence and the formation of linguistic areas. In Osamu Hieda, Christa König, & Hiroshi Nakagawa (eds.), Geographical typology and linguistic areas, 143–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tufs.2.11mat

Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2015. On the loss of tense and verb-adjacent clitics in Slavic. In Theresa Biberauer, & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions, 180–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0011

Mišeska Tomić, Olga. 2006. Balkan Sprachbund Morpho-syntactic Features (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 67). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4488-7

Nicolae, Alexandru & Dana Niculescu. 2016. Pronominal clitics: clitic ordering, clitic clusters. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), The Syntax of Old Romanian, 52–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712350.003.0002

Nicolae, Alexandru. 2015. Ordinea constituenților în limba română: o perspectivă diacronică. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.

Nicolae, Alexandru. 2018. Romanian modal verb configuration and phases. Paper presented at ICUB Lunchtime Seminar, University of Bucharest, 22/03/2018.

Nicolae, Alexandru. 2019. Word Order and Parameter Change in Romanian. A Comparative Romance Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807360.001.0001

Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela. 2013. The infinitive. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), The Grammar of Romanian, 211–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pancheva, Roumyana. 2005. The Rise and fall of second position clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 103–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-2510-y

Parry, Mair. 2005. Parluma ’d Còiri. Sociolinguistica e grammatica del dialetto di Cairo Montenotte. Savona: Liguria.

Pescarini, Diego. 2020. La microvariation syntaxique dans les langues romanes. Un modèle paramétrique. Habilitation thesis, University of Côte d’Azur.

Progovac, Ljiljana. 1993. Locality and Subjunctive-like Complements in Serbo-Croatian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1: 116–44.

Radanović-Kocić, Vesna. 1988. The grammar of Serbo-Croatian clitics: a synchronic and diachronic perspective. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign.

Reinheimer, Sanda, & Liliane Tasmowski. 2005. Pratique des langues romanes. II. Les pronoms personnels. Paris: L’Hartamann.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1976. Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 1: 1–54.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1978. A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In Samuel Jay Keyser (ed.), Recent transformational studies in European languages, 113–58. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883718.1

Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.003.0002

Salvi, Giampaolo. 2004. La formazione della struttura di frase romaza. Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110945508

Saramandu, Nicolae. 1984. Aromâna. In Valeriu Rusu (ed.), Tratatul de dialectologie românească, 423–76. Craiova: Scrisul Românesc.

Sârbu, Richard, & Vasile Frățilă. 1998. Dialectul istroromân. Texte și glosar. Timișoara: Amarcord.

Schifano, Norma. 2018. Verb Movement in Romance. A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804642.001.0001

Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1994. Aspect and verbal complementation in Russian. In Sergey Avrutin, Steven Franks, & Ljiljana Progovac (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The MIT meeting, 400–22. Ann Arbor (MI): Michigan Slavic Publications.

Siemund, Peter. 2008. Language contact: Constraints and common paths of contact-induced language change. In Peter Siemund, & Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language Contact and Contact Languages, 3–11. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.7.01sie

Stepanov, Arthur. 2007. On the Absence of Long-Distance A-Movement in Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 15: 81–108.

Thomason, Sarah. 2010. Contact Explanations in Linguistics. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, 31–47. Malden (Mass.): Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318159.ch1

Tortora, Christina. 2014. A comparative grammar of Borgomanerese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945627.001.0001

Turano, Giuseppina. 2017. Modal particles in Albanian subjunctive, infinitive and supine constructions: presence vs absence of clitic climbing. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali 3: 61–86. https://doi.org/10.13128/QULSO-2421-7220-21339

Vaillant, André. 1977. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves (Tome V. La syntaxe). Paris: Klincksieck.

Večerka, Radoslav. 1989. Altkirchenslavische (Altbulgarische) Syntax. Freiburg i. Br.: U.W. Weiher.

Vulpe, Magdalena. 1963. Repartiția geografică a construcțiilor cu infinitivul și cu conjunctivul în limba română. Fonetică și Dialectologie 5: 123–56.