Imperatives and their interaction with VP-ellipsis in Spanish
In this squib, I focus on the interaction between imperative formation and head stranding ellipsis in Spanish, with the aim of reassessing Martins’ (1994) generalization that head movement from V to the polarity-encoding head Σ is a necessary condition for licensing predicate ellipsis. The author argues that Spanish affirmative imperatives, derived by head movement to Σ, behave as predicted by the theory, giving rise to a particular instance of verb stranding ellipsis. In this paper, I show that Spanish does not have the type of ellipsis she predicts in affirmative imperatives. Putative examples of V-stranding XP-ellipsis in the relevant environments are analyzed here as involving some sort of exophoric null object, consistent with Masullo’s (2017) account. Thus, Spanish contrasts sharply with Portuguese, a language which does feature this variety of ellipsis. Consequently, there are important implications for the morphosyntax of Spanish imperatives, the licensing of ellipsis and, more broadly, the theory of head movement.
Keywordsimperatives, null objects, V-stranding XP-ellipsis, head movement, Spanish
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical functional changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Campos, Héctor. 1986. Indefinite object drop. Linguistic Inquiry 17(2): 354–359.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Costa, João, Martins, Ana Maria & Fernanda Pratos. 2012. VP Ellipsis: New evidence from Cape Verdean. In Irene Franco, Sara Lusini, and Andrés Saab (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2010, 155-175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cyrino, Sonia & Gabriela Matos. 2002. VP Ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese: A comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1(2): 177–214.
Goldberg, Lotus M. 2005. Verb-stranding VP ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University.
Hankamer, Jorge & Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391-426.
Homberg, Anders. 2001. The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica. A journal of general linguistics 55(2): 141-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00077
Kayne, Richard. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647-686.
Laka, Itzar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: on the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Martins, Ana Maria. 1994. Enclisis, VP-Deletion and the Nature of Sigma. Probus 6(2-3): 173-205.
Masullo, Pascual 2017. La interfaz sintaxis-pragmática: caída de objeto acusativo sin clítico en el español rioplatense. SAGA. Revista de Letras 7: 53-72.
Rivero, María Luisa & Antonio Terzi. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and Logical Mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 301-332.
Roberts, Ian. 1991. Excorporation and Minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1): 209-218.
Saab, Andrés. 2008. Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial de la elipsis. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Thoms, Gary. 2018. Ellipsis Licensing and Verb Movement in Scandinavian. Ms., New York University.
Verdecchia, Matías. 2022. Object drop in Spanish is not island-sensitive. Journal of Linguistics 58(3): 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000202
Copyright (c) 2023 María Florencia Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.