Satellite-framed lexicalization of creation events in French?

A view on effected objects and resultative PPs

Authors

Abstract

As a typical verb-framed language, French has only limited ability to combine manner verbs with result-denoting constituents in the VP. Based on an event structural approach, this contribution explores the compatibility of different types of manner verbs with two syntactic means of lexicalizing the product/result of a creation event, namely effected objects and resultative PPs headed by en. Data from two acceptability judgment tasks show the following findings: 1) Manner verbs that do not allow for an effected object canonically can still be coerced into a creation reading as long as no general constraint is violated. 2) Resultative PPs prove as acceptable across verb classes, but acceptability is shown to vary based on the internal makeup of the PP, which embeds either a bare noun or a full DP. Verbs that allow for an effected object are judged as well-formed with PPs of both types, whereas verbs not selecting an effected object are only fully acceptable when a bare noun is embedded in the PP. Creation event lexicalizations that can be regarded as satellite-framed are, thus, not only subject to general structural constraints, but also to more subtle and verb‑specific restrictions.

Keywords

French, verb-framed, satellite-framed, manner verb, effected object, resultative PP, event structure, judgment data

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, Martin, Fabienne & Florian Schäfer. 2017. Optionally causative manner verbs: When implied results get entailed. Roots V, QMUL & UCL, 16-18 June, 2017. https://amor.cms.hu-berlin.de/~schaeffl/papers/roots-final.pdf (March 30, 2022)

Arrizabalaga, Beatriz Rodríguez. 2014. The birth of a new resultative construction in Spanish: A corpus-based description. Folia Linguistica. 48(1): 119–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.005

Atkins, Beryl T., Kegl, Judy & Beth Levin. 1988. Anatomy of a verb entry: From linguistic theory to lexicographic practice. International Journal of Lexicography 1(2): 84–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/1.2.84

Aurnague, Michel. 2008. Qu’est-ce qu’un verbe de déplacement?: critères spatiaux pour une classification des verbes de déplacement intransitifs du français. Congrès Mondial De Linguistique Française, 1905–1917. https://doi.org/10.1051/cmlf08041

Aurnague, Michel. 2019. About asymmetry of motion in French. Some properties and a principle. In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French. Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 32–65. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.01aur

Aurnague, Michel & Dejan Stosic. 2019. Recent advances in the study of motion: A survey. In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French. Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 2–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.intro

Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Beavers, John. 2012. Resultative constructions. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 908–933. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0032

Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2012. Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 331–369. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00093

Beavers, John, Levin, Beth & Shiao Wei Tham. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(02): 331–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272

Bigolin, Alessandro & Josep Ausensi. 2021. A new resultative construction in Spanish? A reply to Rodríguez Arrizabalaga. Folia Linguistica 55(2): 517–546. https://doi.org/10.1515/folia-2021-2078

Burnett, Heather & Michelle Troberg. 2014. On the diachronic semantics of resultative constructions in French. In Christopher Piñón (ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 10, 37–54. Paris: Université Paris 7 Publications.

Carrier, Jill & Janet H Randall. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2): 173–234.

Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Croft, William, Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem B., Sotirova, Violeta & Chiaki Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar, 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10.09cro

Danlos, Laurence, Nakamura, Takuyua & Quentin Pradet. 2014. Vers la création d’un Verb∋net français. TALN-RECITAL 2014 Workshop FondamenTAL 2014 : Ressources lexicales et TAL - vue d’ensemble sur les dictionnaires électroniques de Jean Dubois et Françoise Dubois-Charlier (FondamenTAL 2014 : Lexical Resources and NLP), 103–108. Marseille, France: Association pour le Traitement Automatique des Langues. https://aclanthology.org/W14-6407 (March 30, 2022)

Darby, Jeannique, Alexiadou, Artemis, Spathas, Giorgos & Michael Walsh. 2021. Interpretability, aspectual coercion, and event structure in object-experiencer verbs: An acceptability study. In Artemis Alexiadou & Elisabeth Sophia Maria Verhoeven (eds.), The syntax of argument structure, 137–180. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110757255-006

Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria. 1999. Verbal structure and variation. In Esthela Treviño & José Lema (eds.), Semantic issues in Romance syntax, 39–55. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Dubois, Jean & Françoise Dubois-Charlier. 1997. Les verbes français. Paris: Larousse.

Fábregas, Antonio. 2007. An exhaustive lexicalisation account of directional complements. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics 34(2): 165–199.

Fanselow, Gisbert. 2007. Carrots – perfect as vegetables, but please not as a main dish. Theoretical Linguistics 33(3): 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.023

Fanselow, Gisbert. 2021. Acceptability, grammar, and processing. In Grant Goodall (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of experimental syntax, 118–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569620.006

Fanselow, Gisbert & Stefan Frisch. 2006. Effects of processing difficulty on judgments of acceptability. In Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel & Matthias Schlesewsky (eds.), Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives, 291–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0015

Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2016. Against deficiency-based typologies. Manner alternation parameters in Italian and English. In Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10 Selected papers from “Going Romance” 28, Lisbon, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2020. A head movement approach to Talmy’s typology. Linguistic Inquiry 51(3): 425–470. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00351

Fong, Vivienne & Christine Poulin. 1998. Locating linguistic variation in semantic templates. In Jean-Pierre Koenig (ed.), Discourse and cognition. Bridging the gap, 29–39. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Fortis, Jean-Michel. 2006. Les fonctions de jusqu’à. Modèles linguistiques 54. 137–154. https://doi.org/10.4000/ml.584

François, Jacques, Le Pesant, Denis & Danielle Leeman. 2007. Présentation de la classification des Verbes Français de Jean Dubois et Françoise Dubois-Charlier. Langue française 153(1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.153.0003

Goldberg, Adele E. 2010. Verbs, constructions, and semantic frames. In Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.001.0001

Imbert, Caroline. 2012. Path: Ways typology has walked through it. Linguistics and Language Compass 6(4): 236–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.329

Jakubíček, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff, Vojtěch Kovář, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel. 2013. The TenTen Corpus Family. The 7th Internal Corpus Linguistics Conference, 125–127.

Jezek, Elisabetta. 2014. Classes of creation verbs. In Raffaele Simone & Francesca Masini (eds.), Word classes: Nature, typology and representations, 37–50. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.03jez

Kaufmann, Ingrid & Dieter Wunderlich. 1998. Cross-linguistic patterns of resultatives. Working papers ‘Theory of the Lexicon’ no. 109, SFB 282, University of Düsseldorf.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. Remarks on denominal verbs. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 473–499. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Kipper-Schuler, Karin. 2005. VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. PhD dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.

Kopecka, Anetta. 2009. L’expression du déplacement en français : L’interaction des facteurs sémantiques, aspectuels et pragmatiques dans la construction du sens spatial. Langages 173(1): 54–75. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.173.0054

Kratzer, Angelika. 2005. Building resultatives. In Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten (eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications, 177–212. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110913798.177

Kush, Dave, Lohndal, Terje & Jon Sprouse. 2018. Investigating variation in island effects: A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36(3): 743–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z

Lauwers, Peter & Dominique Willems. 2011. Coercion: definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics 49(6): 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.034

Le Bruyn, Bert, de Swart, Henriette & Joost Zwarts. 2012. Bare PPs between indefinites and weak definites. Presentation at University of Düsseldorf, June 2, 2012. https://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Vhosts/SFB991/Le_Bruyn.pdf (March 30, 2022)

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1991. Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41(1–3): 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90034-2

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2006. Constraints on the complexity of verb Meaning and VP Structure. In Hans-Martin Gärtner, Regine Eckardt, Renate Musan & Barbara Stiebels (eds.), Between 40 and 60 Puzzles for Krifka. ZAS. https://www.leibniz-zas.de/fileadmin/media/Dokumente/Personen/40-60_puzzles_for_Krifka/index.html (March 30, 2022)

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner / result complementarity. In Boban Arsenijevic, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates, 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doir.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5983-1_3

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2019. Lexicalization patterns. In Robert Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 395–425. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1300/J024v28n01_04

Lukassek, Julia, Prysłopska, Anna, Hörnig, Robin & Claudia Maienborn. 2017. The semantic processing of motion verbs: Coercion or underspecification? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46(4): 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9466-7

Martin, Fabienne. 2004. Genitives of substance and locative verbs in French. In Ji Yung Kim, Barbara H. Partee, & Yury A. Lander (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 411–426. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.

Martin, Fabienne & Florian Schäfer. 2017. Sublexical modality in defeasible causative verbs. In Ana Arregui, María Luisa Rivero & Andrés Salanova (eds.), Modality across syntactic categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.003.0006

Martínez-Vázquez, Montserrat. 1998. Effected Objects in English and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 1(2). 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.1.2.08mar

Mateu, Jaume. 2003. Parametrizing verbal polysemy: The case of bake revisited. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: 256–269.

Mateu, Jaume. 2012. Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state. A cross-categorial view of event structure, 252–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0010

Mateu, Jaume & Víctor Acedo-Matellán. 2012. The manner/result complementarity revisited: A syntactic approach. In María Cristina Cuervo & Yves Troberge (eds.), The end of argument structure?, 209–228. Bingley: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781780523774_010

Meinschaefer, Judith & Carmen Kelling. 2004. How lexicalization patterns influence syntax: Motion verbs in French and English. In Mary Andronis, Erin Debenport, Anne Pycha & Keiko Yoshimura (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. I of CLS 38 I, 437–452. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Pourcel, Stéphanie & Anetta Kopecka. 2005. Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham and Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 11. 1–61.

Pradet, Quentin & Laurence Danlos. 2012. Adapting VerbNet to French using existing resources. Lrec 2014 1122–1126.

Pusch, Claus D. 2020. «Je dirais que la grosse majorité sont là ». Questions d’accord(s) avec les noms collectifs dans les données OFROM. Studia linguistica romanica 4: 49–73. https://doi.org/10.25364/19.2020.4.3

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pustejovsky, James. 2011. Coercion in a general theory of argument selection. Linguistics 49(6): 1401–1431. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2011.039

R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (March 30, 2022)

Ramchand, Gillian C. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon. A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319

Rapoport, Tova. 2012. Abandoning manner-result complementarity. Colloque en l’honneur de Claude Delmas, September 22, 2012, 1-14. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3. https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/humsos/flit/Documents/faculty_publications/abandoning%20manner-result%20complementarity_tova_rapoport.pdf (March 30, 2022)

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical v and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Sarda, Laure. 2019. French motion verbs. In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French. Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 68–107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.02sar

Schirakowski, Barbara. 2020. Satellite-Framing in French: A view on en resultatives and creation events. Poster presented at Going Romance 34, 25–27 November 2020, Paris (online). https://osf.io/re5s8

Schütze, Carson T & Jon Sprouse. 2013. Judgment data. In Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139013734.004

Slobin, Dan I. 1987. Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics: 435–445. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826

Slobin, Dan I. 2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo

Sprouse, Jon. 2008. The differential sensitivity of acceptability judgments to processing effects. Linguistic Inquiry 39(4): 686–694. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.686

Staum Casasanto, Laura, Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A Sag. 2010. Understanding acceptability judgments: Additivity and working memory effects. In Stellan Ohlsson & Richard Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 224–229. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Swart, Henriëtte de. 2011. Mismatches and coercion. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, 321–349. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226614.574

Talmy, Leonard. 1972. Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi (Ph.D. dissertation). Department of Linguistics, Berkeley: University of California.

Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In John Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 4. New York: Academic Press.

Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, vol. 3, Language typology and syntactic description, 225–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17(1): 480–519. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vorwerg, Constanze. 2012. Experimental methods in psycholinguistics. In Andrea Ender, Adrian Leemann & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Methods in contemporary linguistics, 363–386. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110275681.363

Washio, Ryuichi. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variations. Journal of East Asian Languages 6(1): 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008257704110

Wunderlich, Dieter. 2012. Lexical decomposition in grammar. In Wolfram Hinzen, Edouard Machery & Markus Werning (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 307-327. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0014

Zarcone, Alessandra, McRae, Ken, Lenci, Alessandro & Sebastian Padó. 2017. Complement coercion: The joint effects of type and typicality. Frontiers in Psychology 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01987

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Eunjeong Oh. 2007. On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5132.001.0001

Author Biography

Barbara Schirakowski, Freie Universität Berlin

Department of Romance Philology, post-doc

Published

29-11-2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.