A prosodic constraint on wh-extraction from preverbal infinitival subjects

Authors

  • Carlos Muñoz Pérez Universidad Austral de Chile
  • Matías Verdecchia
  • Fernando Carranza

Abstract

This paper introduces a series of mitigating circumstances improving the acceptability of wh-extraction from preverbal infinitival subjects in Rioplatense Spanish. It is argued that the factor behind these amelioration effects is encoded in prosodic structure, much in line with the hypothesis that certain island restrictions apply at PF. The linguistic principle accounting for the phenomenon is proposed to be a faithfulness constraint at the syntax-
prosody interface stating that an extraction domain XP cannot be mapped as a prosodic word ω at PF. An alternative syntactic account based on freezing is shown to be unable to capture the relevant contrasts.

Keywords

syntactic movement, island repair, prosodic structure, Rioplatense Spanish

References

Baker MC. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Dehe N. 2014. Parentheticals in Spoken English. The Syntax-Prosody Relation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139032391

D’Imperio M, Elordieta G, Frota S, Prieto P, Vigário M. 2005. Intonational phrasing in Romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure. In: Frota S, Vigário M, Freitas MJa (eds) Prosodies. With Special Reference to Iberian Languages, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 59–97.

Elordieta G, Frota S, Prieto P, Vigário M. 2003. Effects of constituent weight and syntactic branching on intonational phrasing in Ibero-Romance. In: Recasens D, Solé MJ, Romero J (eds) Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp 487–490.

Elordieta G, Frota S, Vigario M. 2005. Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in Spanish and Portuguese. Studia Linguistica 59(2-3):110–143, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00123.x

Féry C. 2013. Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(3):683–734, DOI 10.1007/s11049-013-9195-7

Féry C. 2016. Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, DOI 10.1017/9781139022064

Fox D., Lasnik H. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34(1):143–154, DOI 10.1162/002438903763255959

Gabriel C. 2010. On focus, prosody, and word order in Argentinian Spanish: a minimalist OT account. ReVEL special edition n. 4:183–222

Gabriel C., Feldhausen I, Pešková A. 2011. Prosodic phrasing in Porteño Spanish. In: Gabriel C., Lleó C. (eds) Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 153–182, DOI 10.1075/hsm.10.09gab

Haegeman L., Jiménez-Fernández A.L., Radford A. 2014. Deconstructing the subject condition in terms of cumulative constraint violation. The Linguistic Review 31(1):73–150, DOI 10.1515/tlr-2013-0022

Hankamer J., Sag I. 1976. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7:391–426.

Huang C-T.J. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Lasnik H. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In: Kim M., Strauss U. (eds) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 31, Gerogetown University, Gergetown, pp 301–320.

Liu Y., Winckel E., Abeillé A., Hemforth B., Gibson E. 2022. Structural, functional, and processing perspectives on linguistic island effects. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:495–525.

Merchant J. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the theory of ellipsis..Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Merchant J. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In: Johnson K (ed) Topics in ellipsis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 132–153.

Muñoz Pérez C., Verdecchia M. 2022. Predicate doubling in Spanish: On how discourse may mimic syntactic movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40, DOI 10.1007/s11049-022-09536-3

Nagel H.N., Shapiro L.P., Nawy R. 1994. Prosody and the processing of filler-gap sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23(6):473–485, DOI 10.1007/bf02146686

Nespor M., Vogel I.B. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Foris, Dordrecht.

Newmeyer F.J. 2016. Nonsyntactic explanations of island constraints. Annual Review of Linguistics 2(1):187–210, DOI 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040707, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040707, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040707

Nunes J., Uriagereka J. 2000. Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3(1):20–43, DOI 10.1111/1467-9612.00023

Ordóñez F. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages. PhD thesis, NYU, New York.

Ordóñez F, Treviño E. 1999. Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107(1-2):39–68, DOI 10.1016/s0024-3841(98)00020-5

Pratt E. 2018. Prosody in sentence processing. In: Fernández E.M., Smith Cairns H. (eds) The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp 365–391.

Ross J. 1969. Guess who? In: Binnick R., Davison A., Green G., Morgan J. (eds) Papers.from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic.Society, Chicago, pp 252–286.

Sag I. 1976. Deletion and Logical Form. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Selkirk E. 1984. Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Selkirk E. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In: Goldsmith J., Riggle J., Yu A. (eds) The Handbook of Phonological Theory, vol 2, Wiley-Blackwell Malden, Oxford, pp 435–483.

Speer S, Blodgett A. 2006. Prosody. In: Traxler MJ, Gernsbacher MA (eds) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Second Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 505–537.

Starke M. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: a theory of locality. PhD thesis, University of Geneva, Geneva.

Straub K., Wilson C., McCollum C., Badecker W. 2001. Prosodic structure and wh- questions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30(4):379–394, DOI 10.1023/a:1010469607504

Szabolcsi A., Lohndal T. 2017. Strong vs. Weak Islands. In: Everaert M., Van Riemsdijk H., Goedemans R., Hollebrandse B. (eds) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Wiley Blackwell, Massachusetts, pp 1–51, DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom008, 2nd edition

Truckenbrodt H. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2):219–255, DOI 10.1162/002438999554048

Truckenbrodt H. 2007. The syntax–phonology interface. In: de Lacy P (ed) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435–456, DOI 10.1017/cbo9780511486371.019

Verdecchia M. 2018. Extracción desde sujetos preverbales no finitos. Talk presented at the XVI Congreso de la Sociedad Argentina de Estudios Lingüísticos. Universidad Nacional de San Martín.

Published

22-10-2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.