Vowel Compression in Altiplateau Mexican Spanish

Authors

Abstract

This paper presents an exploratory study of coda-driven vowel compression in Altiplateau Mexican Spanish (AMS). Previous research has led to the claim that pan-dialectal, coda-driven compression does not occur in Spanish and that, instead, only onset complexity drives the shortening of following vowels (Aldrich & Simonet 2019). Based on acoustic analysis of continuously read speech, we find that mid and low vowels in AMS centralise in closed unstressed syllables, and they also display significant shortening in CVC contexts (relative to their uncompressed duration in CV syllables). By contrast, onset complexity does not induce significant compression in our data. Inferential testing confirms that it is an interaction between stress and syllable structure (i.e. coda presence in unstressed syllables) that is most significant in driving both qualitative and quantitative compression. We argue that phonologically constrained, coda-driven compression occurs in Spanish, but it is dialect-specific and stress-dependent. We consider the implications of these variety-specific patterns in the context of debates concerning Spanish resyllabification, phonological rhythm and the acoustic marking of stress. 

Keywords

acoustic phonetics, phonology, Spanish, vowel compression

References

Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Journal of Linguistics 5(1): 153–164.

Aitken, Adam J. 1981. The Scottish Vowel-Length Rule In M. Benskin & M.S. Samules (eds.). So meny People Longages and Tonges, 131–157. Edinburgh: Univer-sity of Edinburgh.

Aldrich, Alexander C., & Miquel Simonet. 2019. Duration of syllable nuclei in Span-ish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12(2): 247–280.

Antonetti, Pierre, & Mario Rossi. 1970. Préci de phonétique italienne: Synchronie et diachronie. Aix-en-Procence: La Pensée Universitaire.

Arvaniti, Amalia. 2009. Rhythm, Timing and the Timing of Rhythm. Phonetica 66: 46–63.

Arvaniti, Amalia. 2012. The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics 40: 351–373.

Audacity Team. 2017. Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer pro-gram] Version 2.2.1.

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2010. Cyclicity. In M. van Oostendrop, C. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2019–2048. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell

Boersma, Paul, & David Weenik. 2021. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Com-puter program]. Version 6.1.50.

Boyd-Bowman, Peter. 1952. La pérdida de vocales átonas en la altiplanice Mexicana, Nueva Revista de la Filología Hispánica 6: 138–140.

Canellada de Zamora, María Josefa, & Alonso Zamora Vicente. 1960. Vocales Ca-ducas en el Español Mexicano, Nueva Revista de la Filologia Hispánica 14: 221–241.

Colina, Sonia. 1997. Identity constraints and Spanish resyllabification. Lingua 103: 1–23.

Dabkowski, Meghan Frances. 2018. Variable Vowel Reduction in Mexico City Span-ish, Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State University.

Dauer, R.M. 1983. Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonet-ics 11: 51–62.

De Decker, Paul, & Valerie Freeman. 2021. Remote sociophonetic data collection: Vowels and nasalization over video conferencing apps. Journal of the Acoustical So-ciety of America 149: 1211–1223.

Delforge, Ann Marie. 2008. Unstressed Vowel Reduction in Andean Spanish. In L. Calantoni & J. Steele (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Labora-tory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, 107–124.

Delforge, Ann Marie. 2009. The Rise and Fall of Unstressed Vowel Reduction in the Spanish of Cusco, Peru: A Sociophonetic Study. Ph.D. thesis, University of Califor-nia.

Face, Timothy L. 1999. Re-examining Spanish ‘Resyllabification’. In T. Satterfield, C. Tortora & D. Cresti (eds.) Current issues in Romance languages: Selected papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), 81–94. Am-sterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Farnetani, Edda, & Shiro Kori. 1986. Effects of syllable and word structure on seg-mental durations in spoken Italian. Speech Communication 5: 17–34.

Frota, Sonia, & Marina Vigário. 2001. On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese case. Probus 13: 247–275.

Ghai, Ved K. 1980. Contributions to Dogri phonetics and phonology. Annual report of the Institute of Phonetics 14: 31–94.

Ghazli, Salem, Hamdi, Rym, & Melissa Barkat. 2002. Speech Rhythm Variation in Arabic Dialects. In B. Bel (ed.) 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody 2002, 331–334. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.

Gordon, Matthew K., & Timo B. Roettger. 2017. Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic study. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1): 1–11.

Han, Mieko S. 1964. Studies in the phonology of Asian languages 2: Duration of Ko-rean vowels. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

Kaisse, Ellen M. 1999. Resyllabification Precedes all Segmental Rules: Evidence from Argentinian Spanish. In J.-M. Authier, B. E. Bullock & L. A. Reed (eds.) For-mal perspectives on Romance Languages (LSRL XVIII), 197–210. Amsterdam, Phil-adelphia: John Benjamins.

Katz, Jonah. 2012. Compression Effects in English. Journal of Phonetics 40: 390–402.

Lipski, John. 1990. Aspects of Ecuadorian Vowel Reduction. Hispanic Linguistics 4: 1–19.

Lipski, John. 1991. The Many Faces of Spanish /s/-Weakening: (Re)alignment and Ambisyllabicity. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (ed.), Advances in His-panic Linguistics, 198 – 213. Somervillle, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1967. En torno a las vocales caedizas del español mexicano. Nueva Revista de la Filologia Hispánica 17: 1–19.

Maddieson, Ian. 1985. Phonetic Cues for Syllabification. In V. A. Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. 203–221. New York, NY: Academic Press.

McAuliffe, Michael, Socolof, Michaela, Mihuc, Sarah, Wagner, Michael, & Morgan Sonderegger. 2017. Montreal Forced Aligner: Trainable Text-Speech Alignment Us-ing Kaldi. Proc. Interspeech, 498–502.

Melgar-Martínez, Antonia. 1994. El vocalismo del andaluz oriental. Estudios de fonética experimental 6: 11–64.

Munhall, Kevin, Fowler, Carol, Hawkins, Sarah & Elliot Saltzman. 1992. “Compen-satory shortening” in monosyllables of spoken English. Journal of Phonetics 20: 225–239.

Myers, Scott. 1987. Vowel Shortening in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5(4): 485–518.

Ortega-Llebaria, Marta. 2006. Phonetic Cues to Stress and Accent in Spanish. In M. Díaz-Campos (ed.) Selected Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Laboratory Ap-proaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology, 104–118. Somerville, MA: Cascadil-la Proceedings Project.

Ortega-Llebaria, Marta, & Pilar Prieto. 2010. Acoustic Correlates of Stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish. Language and Speech 54(1): 73–97.

Peters, Sandra, & Felicitas Kleber. 2014. Articulatory mechanisms underlying in-cremental compensatory vowel shortening in German. Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich: Germany. https://www.phonetik.uni-muenchen.de/personen/mitarbeiter/kleber_felicitas/publikationen/peters_kleber14_issp.pdf

Pike, Kenneth L. 1945. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Pointon, Graham E. 1980. Is Spanish really syllable-timed? Journal of Phonetics 8(3): 293–304.

R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing [Computer program].

Ramsammy, Michael. 2013. Word-final nasal velarisation in Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 49: 215–255.

Ramsammy, Michael. 2021. Contextual reduction of word-final /l/ in Spanish: an EPG study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, FirstView online: 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100321000128.

Robinson, Kimball. 2012. The dialectology of syllabification: A review of variation in the Ecuadorian Higlands. Romance Philology 66: 115–145.

Rojo, Guillermo. 1991. Frecuencia de fonemas en español actual. In M. Brea & F. Fernández Rei (ed.), Homenaxe ó Profesor Constantino García, 451–467. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Schmitz, Dominic, Niemann, Henrik, & Hae-Eun Cho. 2018. Vowel shortening in German as a function of syllable structure. Conference on Phonetics & Phonology in German-speaking countries (P&P13, Berlin).

Schuh, Russell G. 1978. Bade/Ngizim vowels and syllable structure. Studies in Afri-can Linguistics 9: 247–274.

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie & Alice Turk. 2013. What is speech rhythm? A com-mentary inspired by Arvaniti & Rodriquez, Krivokapi, and Goswami & Leong. La-boratory Phonology 4(1): 93–118.

Smith, Rachel H. & Tamara V. Rathcke. 2020. Dialectal phonology constrains the phonetics of prominence. Journal of Phonetics 78: 1–17.

Steriade, Donca. 1999. Alternatives to syllable-based accounts of consonantal phono-tactics. In O. Fujimura, B. Joseph, and B. Palek (eds), Proceedings of the 1998 Lin-guistics and Phonetics Conference, 205–242. Prague: Karolinum Press.

Strycharczuk, Patrycja & Martin Kohlberger. 2016. Resyllabification Reconsidered: On the Durational Properties Word-final /s/ in Spanish. Laboratory Phonology 7(1): 1–24.

Turk, Alice, Nakai, Satsuki, & Mariko Suagahara. 2006. Acoustic Segment Duration in Prosodic Research: A Practical Guide. In S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertova, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter & J. Schließer (eds.). Methods in Em-pirical Prosody Research, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Wiik, Kaj. 1965. Finnish and English vowels. Turku: University of Turku.

Published

2022-12-16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.