Arguments and modifiers in deverbal nominals: Romanian Genitives and de-PPs

Authors

  • Elena Soare University of Paris 8 & CNRS-SFL
  • Isabelle Roy University of Nantes & CNRS LLING

Abstract

This paper addresses the distribution of Genitives and PPs in deverbal nominalizations with a particular focus on Romanian -tor nominals that express agents, e.g., vânzător ‘seller’, and instruments, e.g., tocător ‘shredder’. The issue of the distribution of Genitives is central to understanding the argumental structure properties of deverbal nominalizations in Romanian, and cross-linguistically. Derived nominals expressing agents and instruments have been and continue to be the subject of much controversy in the literature with respect to whether they (or at least some of them) involve an argument structure. We argue that the existence of an argumental Genitive in Romanian provides strong support for views that propose that (at least a subclass of) agent nominals have argument-structure properties. However, we also show that a proper understanding of the distribution of Genitive case-marked complements and PPs bears upon their interpretive nature, and more particularly on their specific vs. non-specific interpretation.

Keywords

deverbal nominals, agent and instrument-denoting nominals, argument structure, event structure, argument, modifier, genitive, PP

References

Alexiadou, Artemis and Florian Schäfer. 2008. Instrumental -er Nominals Revisited, in: Online Proceedings of WCCFL 27 Poster Session. UCLA.

Alexiadou, Artemis and Florian Schäfer. 2010. On the syntax of episodical vs. dispositional -er nominals. In A. Alexiadou and M. Rathert (eds.) Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.

Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking Form: Structuring Sense, Vol. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, Noam 1970. Remarks on Nominalizations. In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell: 184–221.

Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. A semantics for pseudo-incorporation. Manuscript, Rutgers University.

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Tonia Bleam and Maria Teresa Espinal. 2005. Noms nus, nombre et types d’incorporation. In C. Dobrovie-Sorin (ed.) Généricité et détermination nominale, Presses Universitaires de Vincennes: 129-157.

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Tonia Bleam and Maria Teresa Espinal. 2006. Bare nouns, number and types of incorporation. In L. Tasmowski and S. Vogeleer (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 51-79.

Dobrovie-Sorin Carmen and Ion Giurgea. 2015. Weak reference and Property Denotation. Two types of pseudo-incorporated bare nominals. Syntax and Semantics 40: 88-125.

Geenhoven, Veerle van. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions: Semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford: CSLI.

Grimshaw, Jane 1990. Argument Structure. MIT Press.

van Hout, Angeliek and Thomas Roeper. 1998. Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology. In Harley, H. (ed.), Papers from the Upenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, vol.32 of MIT Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, Mass: 175-200.

Knittel, Marie-Laurence. 2010. Possession vs. pseudo-incorporation in the nominal domain, Linguistic Review 27: 177-230.

Massam Diane. 2001. Pseudo-incorporation in Niuean. Natural language and linguistic theory 19: 153–197.

Mathieu, Eric. 2006. Bare nouns and morpho-syntactic reflexes of semantic incorporation: Some new facts. In L. Bateman and C. Ussery (eds), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), Charleston: Book Surge Publishing: 403-418.

McIntyre, Andrew. 2014. Constraining Argument Structure in Nominalizations: The Case of English –Er. Lingua 141: 1.

Milner, Jean-Claude. 1982. Ordres et raisons de langue. Paris, Seuil.

Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847-893.

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin. 1992. -er Nominals: Implications for a Theory of Argument Structure. In T. Stowell and E. Wehrli, eds., Syntax and Semantics 26: Syntax and the Lexicon, Academic Press, New York, NY: 127-153.

Roy, Isabelle, Bridget Copley, Saveria Colonna and Sudha Arunachalam. 2016. “Grammatical and conceptual knowledge of dispositions in the interpretation of -er nominals: Experimental evidence. In Martin, F., M. Pitteroff and T. Pross (eds), Morphological, Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Dispositions, SinSpec series of the SFB732, University of Stuttgart: 92-106.

Roy, Isabelle and Elena Soare. 2013. Event related nominals. In G. Iordăchioaia, I. Roy and K. Takamine (eds.) Categorization and Category Change. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, NewCastle upon Tyne: 123-152.

Roy, Isabelle and Elena Soare. 2014. “On the internal event properties of -er nominals.” Lingua, 141: 139-156.

Roy, Isabelle and Elena Soare. 2020. Agent and other function nominals in a neo-constructionist approach to nominalizations. In Alexiadou, A. and H. Borer (eds.), Nominalization. 50 Years from Chomsky’s Remarks. Oxford University Press: 309-336.

Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2003. La syntaxe de l’article défini : de la structure à l’interprétation. Paper presented at the Modèles Syntaxiques Conference. Brussels, 6-8 March 2003.

Published

22-02-2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.