On the prosodic realization of Spanish ¿no?-tags from a pragmatic perspective

Authors

  • Anna Gazdik Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to report on an empirical study investigating the prosodic realization of the Spanish tag ¿no? added to host clauses with different clause types, realizing various speech act types. Although ¿no? is commonly assumed to display a rising contour, we show that there are level and falling contours over the tag as well, even though rising contours are indeed dominant. The observed tendencies confirm the hypotheses that the contour over the tag is influenced both by the clause type of the host clause (¿no? in exclamatives and interrogatives display wider tonal excursions, and is more often realized with a rising contour than imperatives and declaratives). On the other hand, the type of the modified speech act also plays a role: commissives show more rising contours than expressives, directives and assertives. On the pragmatic side, we assume (with Kiss (2018)) that the function of the tag is the attribution of the whole discourse move to the addressee. In addition, we suppose that the rising contour over the tag signals a call on the addressee to interpret the whole discourse move as a meta-question on the attribution of the realized speech act to the addressee.

Keywords

tag questions, ¿no?, speech acts, clause types, intonation, attribution, call on addressee

References

Asher, Nicholas & Brian Reese. 2007. Intonation and discourse: Biased questions. In Ishihara, S., S. Jannedy, and A. Schwarz (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 8: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0007

Beyssade, Claire & Jean-Marie Marandin. 2006. The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee. In O. Bonami and P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 6: 37-68.

Bu¨ring, Daniel. 2016. Intonation and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Butt, John & Carmen Benjamin. 2013. A new reference grammar of modern Spanish.London/New York: Routledge.

Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM: integrated reference corpora for spoken romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-007-9025-y

Dehe´, Nicole & Bettina Braun. 2013. The prosody of question tags in English. In English Language and Linguistics 17: 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674312000342

Elordieta, Gorka, Masa, Lucía & Magdalena Romera. 2020. Aproximacio´n entonativa al espan˜ol hablado en Ca´ceres. In Estudios de fone´tica experimental 29: 215–239.

Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 1999. Los enunciados interrogativos: Aspectos sema´nticos y pragma´ticos. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Grama´tica Descriptiva de la Lengua Espan˜ola. Vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa Calpe: 3929–3992. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.41.1.176-178

Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2017. Intonation and evidentiality in Spanish polar interrogatives. In Language and Speech 60.2: 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917698178

Escandell-Vidal, Victoria & Pilar Prieto. 2020. Pragmatics and prosody in research on Spanish. In J. C. Félix-Brasdefer and D. A. Koike (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Pragmatics: Foundations and interfaces. London/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455643-11

Estebas Vilaplana, Eva. 2009. Cuatro niveles de altura tonal en la frontera de frase en espan˜ol peninsular. In Onoma´zein. 20.2: 11-32.

Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva & Pilar Prieto. 2010. Castilian Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language, LINCOM Studies in Phonetics 06: 17–48. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.10.2.08fac

Farkas, Donka F & Kim B. Bruce. 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. In: Journal of semantics 27.1: 81–118.

Farkas, Donka F & Roelofsen, Floris. 2017. Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives. In Journal of Semantics 34.2: 237–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffw012

Garc´ıa Vizca´ıno, Mar´ıa Jose´. 2005. El uso de los ape´ndices modalizadores ¿no? y ¿eh? en espan˜ol peninsular. In Selected Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project: 89–101.

Ginzburg, Jonathan. 1996. Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In J. Seligman and D. Westertahl (eds.), Logic, language and computation 1. CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Ginzburg, Jonathan and Sag, Ivan. 2000. Interrogative investigations. Stanford: CSLI publications.

Hualde, José Ignacio & Pilar Prieto. 2015. Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In S. Frota and P. Prieto (eds.), Intonation in romance, Oxford, OUP: 350–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0010

Kiss, Angelika. 2018. Attributing illocutionary acts in Spanish by the tag question no?, ms.

Ladd, D Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press.

Malamud, Sophia A & Tamina Stephenson. 2015. Three ways to avoid commitments: Declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard. In Journal of Semantics, 32.2: 275–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffu002

Ortega Olivares, Jenaro. 1985. Ape´ndices modalizadores en espan˜ol: Los ‘comproba- tivos’. In Estudios roma´nicos dedicados al profesor Andre´s Soria Ortega 1, Granada: Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Granada: 239– 255.

Osa, Adriana. 2017. Negotiation of discourse moves: right periphery tags. In SEM- DIAL 2017 SaarDial, 97-103. https://doi.org/10.21437/semdial.2017-8

Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia B. Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of intonational con- tours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M.E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Portes, Cristel, Beyssade, Claire, Michelas, Amandine and Marandin, Jean-Marie. 2014. The dialogical dimension of intonational meaning: Evidence from French. In: Journal of Pragmatics 74: 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.013

Portner, Paul. 2018. Commitment to priorities. In New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prieto, Pilar. 2015. Intonational meaning. In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 6.4: 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1352

Prieto, Pilar & Roseano, Paolo. 2010. Transcription of intonation of the Spanish lan- guage. München: Lincom Europa.

Prieto, Pilar & Paolo Roseano. 2021. The encoding of epistemic operations in two Romance languages: The in- terplay between intonation and discourse markers. In Journal of Pragmatics 172: 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.008

Stalnaker, Robert C. 1978. Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics. vol. 9 of Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press: 315–332.

Published

22-02-2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.