Distinguishing between accounts of the A/A'-distinction: the view from Argentinian Spanish Clitic Doubling
The A/A'-distinction underpins case, agreement, and binding properties of moving DPs. It also determines possible movement paths (cf. the Ban on Improper Movement). Van Urk (2015) and Safir (2019) take this distinction not to be a primitive of the grammar; rather, these authors seek to derive the A/A’-distinction from independent principles of the grammar. In both approaches, syntactic positions are not inherently A or A’. Rather, independent and more general properties of the grammar determine, as a byproduct, the nature of the movement that passes through these positions. While these approaches differ in which grammatical components they derive the A/A’-distinction from, both are able to explain the properties that it is based on (e.g. weak crossover, reconstruction, etc). Another similarity is that both approaches allow for a flexible definition of syntactic positions. I will argue that, despite these similarities, we can empirically adjudicate between these two theories. Specifically, Di Tullio et al.’s (2019) analysis of clitic doubling in Argentinian Spanish will be shown to be compatible only with Van Urk (2015).
Keywordsclitic doubling, Argentinian Spanish, A/A’-distinction, Insulation, featural definition of syntactic positions
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Colley, Justin, and Privoznov, Dmitry. 2020. “On the topic of subjects: composite probes in Khanty”. Proceedings of the 50th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS). UMass Amherst: GLSA Publications.
Fong, Suzana. 2019. “Proper movement through Spec-CP: An argument from hyperraising in Mongolian”. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1).
Harizanov, Boris. 2014. “Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(4), pp.1033-1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9249-5
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. “Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(2), pp.593-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9233-0
Longenbaugh, Nicholas. 2017. “Composite A/A’-movement: Evidence from English tough-movement”. Ms., MIT. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003604
Obata, Miki, and Samuel David Epstein. 2011. Feature‐Splitting Internal Merge: Improper Movement, Intervention, and the A/A′ Distinction. Syntax, 14(2), pp.122-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00149.x
Saab, Andrés. 2021. From free pronouns to probes: A theory for a subset of Spanish clitics. Lectures notes for the Anglia Ruskin-Cambridge Romance Linguistics Seminars.
Safir, Ken. 2019. “The A/Ā distinction as an epiphenomenon”. Linguistic Inquiry, 50(2), pp.285-336. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00305
Scott, Tessa. 2021. “Formalizing two types of mixed A/Ā movement”. Ms., UC Berkeley. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005874
Di Tullio, Ángela, Andrés Saab, and Pablo Zdrojewski. 2019. "Clitic Doubling in a Doubling World: The Case of Argentinean Spanish Reconsidered." In The Syntactic Variation of Spanish Dialects, pp. 215-244. Oxford University Press https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634797.001.0001
van Urk, Coppe. 2015. A uniform syntax for phrasal movement: A case study of Dinka Bor. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Copyright (c) 2022 Suzana Fong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.