Ignorance and competence implicatures in central Sicilian polar questions

Authors

Abstract

In this paper we examine the distribution and functions of two optional particles found in polar questions in central Sicilian: chi and cusà. The import of these particles can best be understood if their distribution in various types of ‘non-canonical’ questions is analysed, based on the typology outlined in Farkas (2020). In Farkas’s account, canonical questions are characterized by the default assumptions of speaker ignorance and addressee competence about the question’s propositional content, while non-canonical questions lack at least one of these assumptions. This characterization of (non)-canonical questions in terms of speaker ignorance and addressee competence allows us to capture the distribution of the two particles, which strengthen these assumptions to conventional implicatures. In particular, we show that chi is conventionally associated with addressee competence, while cusà is conventionally associated with speaker ignorance. We frame this analysis in a version of the inquisitive semantics model, according to which sentence types are characterized by two parameters: the informativeness of the propositional content relative to the participants’ information state, and its inquisitiveness, that is, its potential to raise an issue. This perspective allows is to develop a formal explicit analysis of the particles’ meaning, which can in turn be successfully extended to capture their use beyond polar questions.

Keywords

discourse particles, polar questions, speaker ignorance, addressee competence, conventional implicatures, Sicilian.

References

Bianchi, Valentina & Silvio Cruschina. 2016. The derivation and interpretation of polar questions with a fronted focus. Lingua 170: 47–68.

Brucale, Luisa, Maria Cristina Lo Baido & Egle Mocciaro. 2019. The case of cusà in Sicilian: from interrogative clause to epistemic adverb and discourse marker. Paper presented at Discourse Markers in Romance Languages (DISROM6), Bergamo, 29–31 May 2019.

Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Damonte, Federico & Jacopo Garzonio (2009). Per una tipologia delle particelle interrogative nei dialetti italiani. Riv. Italiana di Dialettologia 32: 97–111.

Farkas, Donka. 2003. Assertion, belief, and mood choice. Ms., University of California at Santa Cruz. http://people.ucsc.edu/~farkas/papers.html

Farkas, Donka. 2020. Canonical and non-canonical questions. Ms., University of California at Santa Cruz / Princeton University. Available at https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WU2ZjIwM/questions.pdf

Farkas, Donka F. & Kim B. Bruce. 2009. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27(1): 81–118.

Farkas, Donka & Floris Roelofsen. 2017. Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives. Journal of Semantics 34(2): 237–289.

Garzonio, Jacopo. 2004. Interrogative types and left periphery: Some data from the Fiorentino dialect. In Barbara Patruno & Chiara Polo (eds), Quaderni di Lavoro ASIS 4: 1–19. Padua: Unipress.

Groenendijk, Jeroen & Floris Roelofsen. 2009. Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. http://sites.google.com/site/inquisitivesemantics/papers

Gunlogson, Christine. 2003. True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. New York: Routledge.

Kocher, Anna. 2019. Unselected Root Complementizers in Ibero-Romance. Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna.

Leone, Alfonso. 1995. Profilo di Sintassi Siciliana. Palermo: Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani.

Lusini, Sara. 2013. Yes–No Question/Marking in Italian Dialects: A Typological, Theoretical and Experimental Approach. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series.

Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia. 2011. Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Munaro, Nicola & Hans-Georg Obenauer. 2002. On the semantic widening of underspecified wh-elements. In Manuel Leonetti, Olga Fernández Soriano & Victoria Escandell Vidal (eds), Current Issues in Generative Grammar, Universidad de Alcalà – Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia – Universidad Autònoma de Madrid, 165–194.

Munaro, Nicola & Cecilia Poletto. 2003. Sentential particles and clausal typing in Veneto dialects. Univ. of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 127-54.

Munaro, Nicola & Cecilia Poletto. 2008. Sentential particles and clausal typing in Venetan dialects. In Benjamin Schaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, 173–199. New York: Routledge.

Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Nonstandard wh-questions and alternative checkers in Pagotto. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery. Interface Explorations 9, 343–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Paesano, Nicolò. 2013. La doppia serie di complementatori (ca e chi) nel siciliano contemporaneo. In Emili Casanova Herrero & Cesáreo Calvo Rigual (eds), Actes del XXVI Congrés Internacional de Lingüística i Filologia Romàniques (CILFR 26), 6–11 de setembre de 2010 València, 1037–1044. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Piccitto, Giorgio & Giovanni Tropea. 1977–2002. Vocabolario Siciliano. Catania: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani/Opera del Vocabolario Siciliano.

Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prieto, Pilar & Gemma Rigau. 2007. The syntax–prosody interface: Catalan interrogative sentences headed by que. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 6(2): 29–60.

Rigau, Gemma & Pilar Prieto. 2005. A typological approach to Catalan interrogative sentences headed by que. Report de Recerca GGT-05-8. Centre de Linguistica Teorica de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.

Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position ‘‘Int (errogative)’’ in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), Current Studies in Italian Syntax, 287–297. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Roelofsen, Floris & Donka Farkas. 2015. Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions. Language 91: 359–414.

Roelofsen, Floris & Sam van Gool (2010), ‘Disjunctive questions, intonation, and highlighting’. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.), Logic, Language, and Meaning: Selected Papers from the Seventeenth Amsterdam Colloquium, 384–94. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.

Roelofsen, Floris, Michele Herbstritt & Maria Aloni. 2019. The *whether puzzle. In Klaus Heusinger, Malte Zimmermann & Edgar Onea (eds), Questions in Discourse, Volume 1, 172–197. Leiden: Brill.

Rohlfs, Gerard. 1969. Grammatica Storica della Lingua Italiana e dei suoi Dialetti, Vol. 3. Sintassi e Formazione delle Parole. Turin: Einaudi.

Scivoletto, Giulio. 2020. La particella enfatica a e la lessicalizzazione delle interiezioni in siciliano. In Iride Valenti (ed.), Lessicalizzazioni “complesse”: ricerche e teoresi, 425–440. Rome: Aracne.

Sifianou, Maria. 1999. Politeness phenomena in England and Greece. A cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Speas, Peggy & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Stalnaker, Robert, 1978. Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: Academic Press,. Reprinted in: Context and Content, 78–95. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published

22-02-2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.