Auxiliary selection is Agree: Person-driven and argument-structure-based splits

Irene Amato

doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.131

Auxiliary selection is Agree

Person-driven and argument-structure-based splits

Authors

Irene Amato

PDF

Abstract

In this paper, I address the problem of auxiliary selection in Standard Italian and in Southern Italo-Romance varieties. In the former, the auxiliary depends on the argument structure, in the latter on the person feature of the subject. However, the features of the arguments play a crucial role even in languages where auxiliary selection is argument structure- driven. Therefore, I propose that auxiliary selection is the result of person Agree in both systems. Cross-linguistic variation is due to a single syntactic parameter (the ordering of the features on Perf) and to different inventories of vocabulary entries. In this contribution, I focus on Italo-Romance varieties, in particular on person-driven systems and on so-called mixed systems. I show that the apparently very different systems of auxiliary selection in Standard Italian and in Italo-Romance varieties are more similar than it seems: not only auxiliary selection in Italian is Agree for the person feature, but also many alleged person-driven varieties are indeed argument-structure-based systems.

Keywords

auxiliary selection, Standard Italian, Italo-Romance varieties, Agree, person feature

References

Abels, Klaus. 2012. Phases: An essay on cyclicity in syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

de Alencar, Leonel F. & Carmen Kelling. 2005. Are reflexive constructions transitive or intransitive? Evidence from German and Romance. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference, 1-20.

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Vol. 55. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001

Amato, Irene. 2020. Auxiliary selection in Italo-Romance. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics 38.

Amato, Irene. 2021. Auxiliary Selection in Italo-Romance: A Nested Agree Approach. PhD thesis. Universität Leipzig.

Assmann, Anke et al. 2015. Ergatives move too early: On an instance of opacity in syntax. Syntax 18.4: 343-387.

Bjorkman, Bronwyn Alma Moore. 2011. BE-ing default: The morphosyntax of auxiliaries. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In D. Michaels R. Martin & J. Uriagereka (eds.) Step by Step. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 89-155.

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale. A Life in Language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1-52.

Cocchi, Gloria. 1995. La selezione dell’ausiliare. Padova: Unipress.

Coon, Jessica & Stefan Keine. 2020. Feature gluttony. Linguistic Inquiry: 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00386

D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2017. When you have too many features: auxiliaries, agreement, and clitics in Italian varieties. Glossa 2.1. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.102

D’Alessandro, Roberta & Ian Roberts. 2010. Past participle agreement in Abruzzese: split auxiliary selection and the null-subject parameter. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28.1: 41-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-009-9085-1

Georgi, Doreen. 2014. Opaque interactions of Merge and Agree: On the nature and order of elementary operations. PhD thesis. University of Leipzig.

Georgi, Doreen & Elisabeth Stark. 2020. Past participle agreement in French - one or two rules? In Marc-Olivier Hinzelin, Natascha Pomino, & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.) Formal Approaches to Romance Morphosyntax. Vol. 576.Walter de Gruyter,

-48.

Giammarco, Ernesto. 1973. Selezione del verbo ausiliare nei paradigmi dei tempi composti. Abruzzo 11: 152-178.

Hale, Kenneth & J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building. Vol. 20. MIT Press, 111-176.

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111 -176. https://doi.org/10.2307/416329

Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot international 4.4: 3-9.

Heck, Fabian. 2016. Non-monotonic derivations. PhD thesis. Habiliation thesis, Universität Leipzig.

Heck, Fabian & Gereon Müller. 2007. Extremely local optimization. Proceedings of the 26th WECOL: 170-183.

Heinat, Fredrik. 2006. Probes, Pronouns and Binding in the Minimalist Program. PhD thesis. Lund University.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2019. Parameters in the development of Romance perfective auxiliary selection. In M. Cennamo & C. Fabrizio (eds.) Historical Linguistics 2015 : Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27-31 July 2015. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 343-384. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.348.17led

Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic inquiry 34.3: 506-515.

Legendre, Géraldine. 2010. A formal typology of person-based auxiliary selection in Italo-Romance. In R. D’Alessandro, A. Ledgeway, & I. Roberts (eds.) Syntactic variation: The dialects of Italy. Cambridge University Press, 186-200.

Loporcaro, Michele. 2001. La selezione dell’ausiliare nei dialetti italiani: Dati e teorie. In F. A. Leoni et al. (eds.) Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche. Atti del XXXIII congresso internazionale di studi della Società di linguistica italiana, Napoli, 28–30 ottobre 1999. Roma: Bulzoni, 455-476. https://doi.org/10.33137/q.i..v39i1.32658

Loporcaro, Michele. 2007. On triple auxiliation in Romance. Linguistics 45.1: 173-222. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2007.005

Loporcaro, Michele. 2016. Auxiliary selection and participle agreement. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (eds.) The Oxford guide to the Romance languages. Oxford University Press, 802-818. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0049

Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia. 2007. A unification of morphology and syntax: Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968154

Manzini, Maria Rita&Leonardo Maria Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci: L’ausiliare (2a parte); La negazione e l’avverbio; Strutture aspettuali e modali; Il sintagma nominale; Bibliografia. Vol. 3. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.

Müller, Gereon. 2009. Ergativity, accusativity, and the order of Merge and Agree. In K. Grohmann (ed.) Explorations of phase theory: Features and arguments. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 269-308. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213966.269

Müller, Gereon. 2010. On deriving CED effects from the PIC. Linguistic Inquiry 41.1:35-82.

Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Annual meeting

of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Vol. 4, 157-190.

https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198

Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation: 262-294. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes

Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32.3: 439-492. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372522

Reuland, Eric. 2005. Agreeing to bind. Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk: 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892994.505

Sabel, Joachim. 1998. Principles and parameters of wh-movement. Habilitation thesis. Universität Frankfurt.

Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language: 859-890. https://doi.org/10.2307/417202

Sportiche, Dominique. 2014. Assessing unaccusativity and reflexivity: using focus alternatives to decide what gets which ?-role. Linguistic Inquiry 45.2: 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00156

Tuttle, Edward. 1986. The spread of esse as universal auxiliary in central Italo-Romance. Medioevo romanzo 11.2: 229-287.