A categorial grammar of Spanish auxiliary chains
Abstract
Spanish auxiliary sequences as in Juan puede haber tenido que estar empezando a trabajar hasta tarde ‘Juan may have had to be starting to work until late’, traditionally termed auxiliary chains, have two properties that are not naturally captured in phrase-structure approaches to syntax: (i) they follow no a priori fixed order; auxiliary permutations have different meanings, none of which is any more basic than any other (cf. Juan puede estar trabajando ‘Juan may be working’ and Juan está pudiendo trabajar ‘Juan is currently able to work’); and (ii) the syntactic and semantic relations established within a chain go beyond strict monotonicity or cumulative influence; rather, they present different kinds of syntactic relations in distinct local domains. We show that an alternative to syntax grounded in a modification of the categorial grammar introduced in Ajdukiewicz (1935) that closely follows Montague (1973), Dowty (1978, 1979, 2003), and Schmerling (1983a, b, 2019) provides effective tools for subsuming Spanish auxiliary chains in an explicit and explanatory grammar.
Keywords
categorial grammar, Spanish grammar, auxiliary verb, auxiliary chain, lexical auxiliary, functional auxiliaryReferences
Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aissen, Judith & David Perlmutter. 1976. Clause reduction in Spanish. In H. Thompson, K. Whistler, V. Edge, J. Jaeger, R. Javkin, M. Petruck, C. Smeall, R. Van Valin Jr. (eds.) Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 2: 1–30.
Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. 1935. Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica 1: 1–28.
Akmajian, Adrian, Susan Steele & Thomas Wasow. 1979. The category AUX in universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10(1): 1–64.
Akmajian, Adrian & Thomas Wasow. 1975. The constituent structure of VP and AUX and the position of the verb BE. Linguistic Analysis 1: 205–245.
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1994. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2006. Auxiliary verb constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280315.001.0001
Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2011. Auxiliary verb constructions (and other complex predicate types): A functional-constructional overview. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(11): 795–828.
Bach, Emmon. 1979. Control in Montague grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10(4): 515–531.
Bach, Emmon. 1983. Generalized Categorial Grammars and the English auxiliary. In F. Heny & B. Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol. 2, 101–120. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua.1953. A quasi-arithmetical notation for sentence description. Language 29: 47–58.
Baunaz, Lena & Eric Lander. 2018. Nanosyntax: The basics. In L. Baunaz, L. Haegeman, K. De Clercq & E. Lander (eds.) Exploring Nanosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn. 2011. BE-ing default: The morphosyntax of auxiliaries. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The normal course of events: Structuring sense, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bosque, Ignacio. 2014. On resultative past participles in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 13: 41-77.
Bravo, Ana. 2016. Verbos modales. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, vol. 2, 163–173. London: Routledge.
Bravo, Ana. 2017. Modalidad y verbos modales. Madrid: Arco Libros / La Muralla.
Bravo, Ana & Luis García Fernández. 2016. Perífrasis verbales. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, vol. 1. London: Routledge.
Buszkowski, Wojciech. (1997) Mathematical linguistics and proof theory. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of logic and language, 683–736. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Carpenter, Robert. 1989. Phrase meaning and categorial grammar. PhD thesis: University of Edinburgh.
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles. 2008. Los tiempos compuestos del español: Formación, interpretación y sintaxis. In Á. Carrasco Gutiérrez (ed.) Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, 13–64. Madrid-Frankfurt: Iberoamericana.
Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles & Luis García Fernández. 1994. Sequences of tense in Spanish. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 4(1): 45–70.
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control 2. 137–167.
Chomsky, Noam. 1964a. Current issues in linguistic theory. In J. Fodor & J. Katz (eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, 50–118. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chomsky, Noam. 1964b. A transformational approach to syntax. In J. Fodor & J. Katz (eds.) The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, 211–245. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays in Minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. ‘Restructuring’ and functional structure. In G. Cinque (ed.), Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 4, 132–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Correas, Gonzalo. 1626 [1903]. Arte de la lengua española y castellana. Madrid: Real Academia Española.
Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalrymple, Mary & Louise Mycock. 2011. The prosody-semantics interface. In M. Butt & T. Holloway King (eds.) Proceedings of LFG11, 173-193. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Daniela Isac. 2008. The asymmetry of Merge. Biolinguistics 2(4): 260–290.
Dowty, David. 1978. Governed transformations as lexical rules in a Montague grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 9(3): 393–426.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dowty, David. 1982. Tenses, time adverbs, and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(1). 23–55.
Dowty, David. 1996. Toward a minimalist theory of syntactic structure. In H. Bunt and A. van Horck (eds), Discontinuous Constituency. Berlin: De Gruyter. 11–62.
Dowty, David. 2003. The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in categorial grammar. In E. Lang, C. Maienborn & C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), Modifying adjuncts, 33–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dowty, David, Robert Wall & Stanley Peters. 1981. Introduction to Montague semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fábregas, Antonio. 2013. Differential object marking in Spanish: The state of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(2): 1–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2603
Falk, Yehuda. 1984. The English Auxiliary System: A Lexical-Functional Analysis. Language 60(3), 483-509.
Falk, Yehuda. 2003. The English Auxiliary System Revisited. In M. Butt & T. Holloway King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFG03 Conference, 184-204. Stanford: CSLI.
Fernando, Tim. 2015. The semantics of tense and aspect. In S. Lappin & C. Fox (eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch7
García Fernández, Luis. 2000. La gramática de los complementos temporales. Madrid: Visor.
García Fernández, Luis. 2006. Perífrasis verbales en español. In L. García Fernández (dir.), Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, 9–58. Madrid: Gredos.
García Fernández, Luis & Diego Gabriel Krivochen. 2019a. Dependencias no locales y cadenas de verbos auxiliares. Verba 43: 207–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/verba.46.4567
García Fernández, Luis & Diego Gabriel Krivochen. 2019b. Las perífrasis verbales en contraste. Madrid: Arco Libros.
García Fernández, Luis & Diego Gabriel Krivochen. 2020. Formas no finitas duplicadas en las cadenas de verbos auxiliares. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 35: 143-170.
García Fernández, Luis, Diego Gabriel Krivochen & Ana Bravo. 2017. Aspectos de la semántica y sintaxis de las cadenas de verbos auxiliares en español. Moenia 23: 1–28.
García Fernández, Luis, Diego Gabriel Krivochen & Félix Martín Gómez. 2020. Los elementos intermedios en las perífrasis verbales. Lingüística Española Actual XLII/2. 167-200.
Gazdar, Gerald, Geoffrey K. Pullum & Ivan A. Sag, 1982. Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar. Language 58(3): 591−638.
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo. 1999. Los verbos auxiliares: Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2. 3323–3389.53. Madrid: Espasa.
Hamblin, Charles. 1973. Questions in Montague English, Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.
Harwood, William. 2014. Rise of the auxiliaries: A case for auxiliary raising vs. affix lowering. The Linguistic Review 31(2): 295–362.
Huddleston, Rodney. 1974. Remarks on the analysis of auxiliaries as main verbs. Foundations of Language 11(2): 215–229.
Iglesias Bango, Manuel. 2008. Review of Luis García Fernández (dir.), Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, 1999, Madrid: Gredos. Revue romane de linguistique 72: 225–236.
Jacobson, Pauline. 1987. Phrase structure, grammatical relations, and discontinuous constituents. In G. Huck & A. Ojeda (eds.), Syntax and semantics (vol. 20): Discontinuous constituency, 27–69. New York: Academic Press.
Jacobson, Pauline. 2000. Paycheck pronouns, Bach-Peters sentences and variable-free semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8: 77–155.
Jespersen, Otto. 1949. A modern English grammar on historical principles. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kaplan, Ronald. 1995. The Formal Architecture of Lexical-Functional Grammar. In M. Dalrymple, R. M. Kaplan, J. T. Maxwell III & A. Zaenen (eds.) Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, 7-27. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard. 2018. The place of linear order in the language faculty. Talk delivered at the University of Venice, 16 June 2018. https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/linguistics/documents/Kayne%200118%20Venice%20The%20Place%20of%20Linear%20Order%20in%20the%20Language%20Faculty.pdf
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel. Forthcoming. Algunos problemas de la sintaxis de los auxiliares modales. To appear in A. Bravo & C. Borgonovo (eds.) Los verbos modales y la expresión de la modalidad. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel & Luis García Fernández. 2019. On the position of subjects in Spanish periphrases: Subjecthood left and right. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 8(1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4687
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel & Luis García Fernández. 2020. Variability in syntactic-semantic cycles: Evidence from auxiliary chains. In M. González-Rivera & S. Sessarego (eds.) Interface-driven phenomena in Spanish: Essays in honor of Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 145-168. London: Routledge.
Laca, Brenda. 2004. Romance ‘aspectual’ periphrases: Eventuality modification versus ‘syntactic’ aspect. In J. Lecarme & J. Guéron (eds), The syntax of time, 425–440. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lambek, Joachim. 1958. The mathematics of sentence structure. The American Mathematical Monthly 65(3): 154–170.
Lewis, David. 1972. General semantics. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of natural language, 169–218. Dordrecht: Reidel.
McCawley, James D. 1975. The category status of English modals. Foundations of Language 12(4): 597–601.
Montague, Richard. 1970. Universal grammar. Theoria 36: 373–398.
Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik & P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to natural language, 221–242. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Moortgat, Michael. 2011. Categorial type logics. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of logic and language, 2nd edition, 95–179. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Morera, Marcial. 1991. Diccionario crítico de las perífrasis verbales del español. Puerto del Rosario, Cabildo Insular de Fuerteventura.
Müller, Stefan. 2019. Constituent order. In S. Müller, A. Abeillé, R. D. Borsley & J.-P. Koenig (eds.), Head-driven phrase structure grammar: The handbook. Berlin: Language Science Press. 265–308.
Olbertz, Hella. 1998. Verbal periphrases in a functional grammar of Spanish. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Osborne, Timothy. 2005. Beyond the constituent: A dependency grammar analysis of chains. Folia Linguistica 39(3-4): 251–297. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2006.39.3-4.251
Partee, Barbara. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6(2): 203–300.
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian & W. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Deirdre Wilson. 1977. Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Language 53(4): 741–788.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
RAE-ASALE (= Real Academia Española / Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española). 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2018. Situations and syntactic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius. 2014. Deriving the ‘functional hierarchy’. Language Sciences 46: 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013
Rizzi, Luigi & Guglielmo Cinque. 2016. Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 139–163.
Roberts, Ian. 1997. Restructuring, head movement and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28(3): 423–460.
Rochette, Anne. 1999. The selection properties of aspectual verbs. In K. Johnson & I. Roberts (eds.), Beyond principles and parameters: Essays in memory of Osvaldo Jaeggli, 145–165. Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_6
Ross, John Robert. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. In W. Todd (ed.), Studies in philosophical linguistics, 77–102. Evanston, IL: Great Expectations.
Sag, Ivan A., Rui P. Chaves, Anne Abeillé, Bruno Estigarribia, Dan Flikinger, Paul Kay, Laura Michaelis, Stefan Müller, Geoffrey Pullum, Frank van Eynde & Thomas Wasow. 2020. Lessons from the English auxiliary system. Journal of Linguistics 56(1). 87-155. doi:10.1017/S002222671800052X
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Schmerling, Susan F. 1983a. Two theories of syntactic categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 393–421.
Schmerling, Susan F. 1983b. A new theory of English auxiliaries. In F. Heny & B. Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol 2, 1–53. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Schmerling, Susan F. 2019. Sound and grammar: A neo-Sapirian theory of language. Leiden: Brill.
Steedman, Mark. 2014. Categorial grammar. In A. Carnie, Y. Sato & D. Siddiqi (eds.), Routledge handbook of syntax, 670–701. London: Routledge.
Steedman, Mark & Jason Baldridge. 2011. Combinatory categorial grammar. In R. Borsley & K. Börjars (eds.) Non-transformational syntax, 181–224. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
van Benthem, Johan. 1988. The Lambek calculus. In R. Oehrle, E. Bach & D. Wheeler (eds.), Categorial grammars and natural language structures, 35–68. Dordrecht: Reidel.
van Kemenade, Ans. 1992. The history of English modals: A reanalysis. Folia Linguistica Historica 13: 143–166. doi: https://10.1515/flih.1992.13.1-2.143
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2004. Two types of restructuring: Lexical vs. functional. Lingua 114: 991–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00102-5
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. The Merge condition: A syntactic approach to selection. In P. Kosta, S. Franks, T. Radeva-Bork & L. Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 130–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2022 Diego Gabriel Krivochen, Susan Schmerling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
