Morphology Within the Parallel Architecture Framework

The Centrality of the Lexicon Below the Word Level

Authors

  • Carlos Benavides University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

Abstract

         

The Parallel Architecture (PA) framework (Jackendoff 2002, 2007, Culicover & Jackendoff 2005) is one of the most complete constraint-based linguistic theories that encompasses phonology, syntax and semantics. However, it lacks a fully developed model of word formation. More recently, a theory called Relational Morphology (RM) (Jackendoff & Audring 2020) has been developed, that integrates into the PA. The current study shows how the Slot Structure model (Benavides 2003, 2009, 2010), which is compatible with the PA and is based on the dual-route model and percolation of features (Pinker 1999, 2006; Huang & Pinker 2010), can provide a better account of morphology than RM, and can also be incorporated into the PA, thus contributing to make this a more explanatory framework. Spanish data are used as the basis to demonstrate the implementation of the SSM. The current paper demonstrates two key problems for RM: inconsistent and confusing coindexation, and a proliferation of schemas, and shows that these issues do not arise in the Slot Structure model. Overall, the paper points out significant drawbacks in the RM framework, while at the same time showing how the PA’s morphological component can be enriched with the Slot Structure model.

Keywords

dual-route, slot structure, Relational Morphology, schema, lexical redundancy

References

Abeillé, Anne, & Robert Borsley. 2021. Basic properties and elements. In Stefan Müller, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.), Head-driven phrase structure grammar: The handbook, 3-45. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Ackerman, Farrell, & John Moore. 1999. Syntagmatic and paradigmatic dimensions of causee encodings. Linguistics and Philosophy 22:1-44.

Alegre, Maria, & Peter Gordon. 1999. Rule-based versus associative processes in derivational morphology. Brain and Language 68: 347-54.

Alsina, Alex. 1992. On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517-56.

Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Acquaviva, Paolo. 2016. Morphological semantics. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 117-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Archibald, John, & Gary Libben. 2019. Morphological theory and second language acquisition. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 522-40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arkadiev, Peter, & Marian Klamer. 2019. Morphological theory and typology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 435-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Aronoff, Mark. 2007. In the beginning was the word. Language 83: 803-30.

Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: SUNY Press.

Benavides, Carlos. 2003. Lexical Conceptual Structure and Spanish derivation. Journal of Language and Linguistics 2: 163-211.

Benavides, Carlos. 2009. The semantics of Spanish morphology: The Slot Structure Model. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.

Benavides, Carlos. 2010. El clítico ‘se’ en español y la estructura léxico-conceptual. RILCE:Revista de Filología Hispánica 26: 261-88.

Blevins, James. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42: 531-73.

Blevins, James; Farrell Ackerman; & Robert Malouf. 2019. Word and Paradigm morphology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 265-84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blom, Elma. 2019. Morphological theory and first language acquisition. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 511-21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bochner, Harry. 1992. Simplicity in generative morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bonami, Olivier, & Berthold Crysmann. 2016. Morphology in constraint-based lexical approaches to grammar. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 609-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Booij, Gert. 1995. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 1-16. Dordrecht: Foris.

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booij, Geert. 2013. Morphology in construction grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 255-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booij, Geert, & Jenny Audring. 2015. Construction morphology and the Parallel

Architecture of grammar. Cognitive Science 41: 277-302.

Borer, Hagit. 2005a. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borer, Hagit. 2005b. The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bresnan, Joan, & Sam A. Mchombo. 1995. The lexical integrity principle; evidence fromBantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181-254.

Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bruening, Benjamin. 2018. The lexicalist hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous. Language94: 1–42.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Clahsen, Harald., & Y. Ikemoto. 2012. The mental representation of derived words: Anexperimental study of -sa and -mi nominals in Japanese. The Mental Lexicon 7: 147-82.

Coseriu, Eugenio. 1977. Principios de semántica estructural. Madrid: Gredos.

Croft, William. 2009. Aspectual and causal structure in event representation. In Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole (ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman, 139-66. New York: Psychological Press.

Crysmann, Berthold. 2021. Morphology. In Stefan Müller, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.), Head-driven phrase structure grammar: The handbook, 947–99. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Crysmann, Berthold, & Olivier Bonami. 2016. Variable morphotactics in Information-based Morphology. Journal of Linguistics 52: 311-74.

Culicover, Peter, & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davies, Mark. 2002. Corpus del Español. www.corpusdelespanol.org.

Davies, William D. 1981. Choctaw clause structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of California San Diego.

Davis, Anthony, & Jean-Pierre Koenig. 2021. The nature and role of the lexicon in HPSG. In Stefan Müller, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.), Head-driven phrase structure grammar: The handbook, 125-76. Berlin: Language Science Press.

DiSciullo, Anna-Maria, & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

DLE-Real Academia Española: Diccionario de la lengua española, 23.ª ed., [versión 23.5 en línea]. https://dle.rae.es

Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547-619.

England, Nora. 1983. A grammar of Mam, a Mayan Language. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Fábregas, Antonio. 2011. On why word phases cannot account for Lexical Integrity effects. Lingue e linguaggio 10: 3-28.

Fillmore, Charles; Paul Kay, & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501-38.

Gerdemann, Dale. 1994. Complement inheritance as subcategorization inheritance. In John Nerbonne, Klaus Netter, & Carl Pollard (eds.), German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 341-63. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Giorgi, Alessandra, & Giuseppe Longobardi. 1991. The syntax of noun phrases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldberg, Adele, & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532-568.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1981. Form, function, and the Language Acquisition Device. In C. L. Baker & John J. McCarthy (eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition, 165-82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Halle, Morris. 1973. Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 3-16.

Hankamer, Jorge. 1989. Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In W. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical representation and process, 392-408. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Harley, Heidi. 2012a. Semantics in Distributed Morphology. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Volume 3, 2151-72. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Harley, Heidi 2012b. Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory. In W. Hinzen, M. Werning & E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 328-50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harley, Heidi. 2015. The syntax-morphology interface. In A. Alexiadou & T. Kiss. Berlin (eds.), Syntax, theory and analysis: An international handbook, Vol II A, 1128-54. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hay, Jennifer. 2001. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39: 1041-70.

Huang, Yi Ting, & Steven Pinker. 2010. Lexical semantics and irregular inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes 25: 1411-61.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51: 639-71.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2007. Language, consciousness, culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2009. Compounding in the Parallel Architecture and Conceptual Semantics. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0006.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2010a. Prologue: The Parallel Architecture and its components. In Ray Jackendoff, Meaning and the lexicon, 1-34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2010b. The ecology of English noun-noun compounds. In Ray Jackendoff, Meaning and the lexicon, 413-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2013a. A Parallel Architecture model of language processing. In Kevin N. Ochsner & Stephen Kosslyn (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive neuroscience, Volume 1: Core topics, 1-22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2013b. Constructions in the Parallel Architecture. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 70-92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2015. In defense of theory. Cognitive Science 1-28.

Jackendoff, Ray, & Jenny Audring. 2019. Relational Morphology in the Parallel Architecture. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 390-408. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray, & Jenny Audring. 2020. The texture of the lexicon: Relational Morphology and the Parallel Architecture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Jensen, John & Margaret Stong-Jensen. 1984. Morphology is in the lexicon! Linguistic Inquiry 15: 474-98.

Kathol, Andreas. 1994. Passives without lexical rules. In John Nerbonne, Klaus Netter, & Carl Pollard (eds.), German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 237-72. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Katz, Jerrold, & Jerry Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170-210.

Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Kisseberth, Charles W., & Mohammad Imam Abasheikh. 1977. The object relationship in Chi-Mwi:ni, a Bantu language. In Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 8, 179-218. New York: Academic Press.

Kornfilt, Jaklin, & Nelson Correa. 1993. Conceptual structure and its relation to the structure of lexical entries. In Eric Reuland & Werner Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and language, Vol. 2, 79-118. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Körtvélyessy, Lívia. 2014. Evaluative derivation. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 296-316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krieger, Hans-Ulrich. 1994. Derivation without lexical rules. In C.J. Rupp, M.A. Rosner & R.L. Johnson (eds.), Constraints, language and computation, 277-313. London: Academic Press.

Lang, M.F. 2013. Spanish word formation. London: Taylor and Francis.

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Lázaro Mora, Fernando. 1993. Compatibilidad entre lexemas nominales y sufijos diminutivos. In Soledad Varela (ed.), La formación de palabras, 303-15. Madrid: Taurus Universitaria.

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2011. Polysemy in derivational affixes. In Nerlich, B., Todd, Z., Herman, V., & Clarke, D. D. (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 217-32. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lewis, G.L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.

Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lieber, Rochelle. 1998. The suffix -ize in English: Implications for morphology. In Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari, & Patrick Farrel (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 12-33. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2019. Theoretical issues in word formation. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 34-55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Luís, Ana. 2019. Morphological theory and creole languages. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 455-75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Masini, Francesca, & Jenny Audring. 2019. Construction Morphology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 365-89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meurers, Detmar. 2001. On expressing lexical generalizations in HPSG. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 161–217.

Michaelis, Laura. 2013. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 133-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Montermini, Fabio. 2006. A new look on word-internal anaphora on the basis of Italian data. Lingua e linguaggio 5: 127-148.

Montermini, Fabio. 2019. Later Generative Grammar and beyond: Lexicalism. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 122-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Müller, Stefan. 2018. The end of lexicalism as we know it? Language 94: e54-e66.

Myachina, E. N. 1981. The Swahili language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Olsen, Susan. 2014. Delineating derivation and compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 26-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.

Pinker, Steven. 2006. Whatever happened to the past tense debate? In Eric Bakovic, Junko Ito, & John J. McCarthy (eds.), Wondering at the natural fecundity of things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince, 221-38. UC Santa Cruz: Festschrifts.

Pinker, Steven, & Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 456-63.

Plag, Ingo. 1997. The polysemy of -ize derivatives: On the role of semantics in word formation. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 219-42. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Plag, Ingo, & Harald Baayen. 2009. Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85: 109–52.

Pollard, Carl, & Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Polomé, Edgar. 1967. Swahili language handbook. Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Pountain, Christopher, & Bozena Wislocka Breit. 2021. Introduction. In Christopher Pountain & Bozena Wislocka Breit (eds.), New worlds for old words, xxiii-xxix. Delaware: Vernon Press.

Pustejovsky, James. 1992. The syntax of event structure. In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical and conceptual semantics, 47-81. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rainer, Franz. 1995. Inflection inside derivation: Evidence from Spanish and Portuguese. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 83-91. Dordrecht: Foris.

Rainer, Franz. 2014. Polysemy in derivation. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 338-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rappaport, Malka, & Beth Levin. 1988. What to do with -roles. In W. Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 21, 7-36. New York: Academic Press.

Rappaport, Malka, & Beth Levin. 1992. -er nominals: Implications for the theory of argument structure. In Tim Stowell & Eric Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 26, 127-53. New York: Academic Press.

Riehemann, Susanne. 1998. Type-based derivational morphology. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 49-77.

Sag, Ivan A. 2012. Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, 69–202. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.

Schiller, Niels, & Rinus Verdonschot. 2019. Morphological theory and neurolinguistics. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 554-72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schulte, Marion. 2015. Polysemy and synonymy in derivational affixation—a case study of the English suffixes -age and -ery. Morphology 25: 371-90.

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Shieber, Stuart M.1986. An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Slabakova, Roumyana. 2008. Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Slabakova, Roumyana. 2013. What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language: A generative perspective. In María del Pilar García Mayo; María Junkal Gutiérrez Mangado; & María Martínez-Adrián (eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition, 5-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Speas, Margaret. 1990. Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Spencer, Andrew. 2016. Two morphologies or one? Inflection versus word formation. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 27-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sproat, R. 1988. On anaphoric islandhood. In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, 291-301. San Diego: Academic Press.

Stump, Gregory. 2019. Paradigm Function Morphology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 285-304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ten Hacken, Pius. 2014. Delineating derivation and inflection. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 10-25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Valera, Salvador. 2014. Conversion. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 154-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vannest, Jennifer; Thad A. Polk; & Richard Lewis. 2005. Dual-route processing of complex words: New fMRI evidence from derivational suffixation. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 5: 67-76.

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Williams, Edwin. 2007. Dumping lexicalism. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0012.

Zaenen, Annie & Adele Goldberg. 1993. Review of Argument structure by Jane Grimshaw. Language 69: 807-17.

Published

01-07-2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.