Comparing two experimental designs for the study of subject islands in Spanish
Abstract
This paper investigates the phenomenon of subject islands in Spanish through the lens of two experimental designs, which we refer to as the subject/object design and the simple/complex subject design. Our study is the first one to directly compare these proposed designs in a single, controlled experiment. By comparing these methodologies, we aim to evaluate their effectiveness in capturing the nuances of subject island effects to establish the basis for future investigations in this area. Our findings reveal that both designs yield a significant degradation in acceptability for extractions from subjects, which is consistent with theoretical proposals that aimed to account for subject islands. We question, however, the assumption that a significant interaction, and by extension super-additivity, is the sole criterion for identifying island structures, given that the different factors tested (i.e., the position of the gap, the object/subject distinction, and the extraction/sub-extraction distinction) did not contribute to the degradation observed in subject islands.
Keywords
island, subject island, subject, experimental syntax, SpanishReferences
Abeillé, Anne, Hemforth, Barbara, Winckel, Eloide, & Edward Gibson. 2020. Extraction from subjects: differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition 204: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293
Agresti, Alan. 2010. Analysis of ordinal categorical data (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/:10.1002/9780470594001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470594001
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph, & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68: 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bürkner, Paul-Christian, & Vuorre, Matti. 2019. Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2(1): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199
Cattell, Ray. 1976. Constraints on Movement Rules. Language 52: 18–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/413206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/413206
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson, & P. Kiparsky (eds), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 232-286. NY: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On Wh-Movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (eds), Formal Syntax, 71–132. NY: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009
Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen. 2022. Ordinal-regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2022, 11–16. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. Towards a unified treatment of island constraints. In W. Dressler, & W. Meid (eds), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists, 344–348. Innsbruck: Innbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of Aʹ-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax. CA: SAGE Publications.
Fiengo, Robert, & James Higginbotham. 1981. Opacity in NP. Linguistic Analysis 7: 347–373.
Frazier, Lyn, & Charles Clifton. 2002. Processing “d-Linked” Phrases. Journal of Psycholinguist Research 31: 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021269122049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021269122049
Gallego, Ángel J. 2011. Successive cyclicity, phases, and CED effects. Studia Linguistica 65(1): 32–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2010.01175.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2010.01175.x
Gallego, Ángel J., & Juan Uriagereka. 2007. Sub-extraction from subjects: A phase theory account. In J. Camacho, N. Flores-Ferrán, L. Sánchez, V. Deprez, & M. J. Cabrera (eds), Romance linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the 36th linguistic symposium on Romance languages (LSRL), 155–168. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.287.12gal DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.287.12gal
Gieselman, Simone, Kluender, Robert, & Ivano Caponigro. 2013. Isolating processing factors in negative island contexts. In Y. Fainleib, N. LaCara, & Y. Park (eds), Proceedings of NELS 41, 233–246. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Goodall, Grant. 2011. Syntactic Satiation and the Inversion Effect in English and Spanish wh-Questions. Syntax 14: 29–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00148.x
Goodall, Grant. 2015. The D-linking effect on extraction from islands and non-islands. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01493
Haegeman, Liliane, Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., & Andew Radford. 2014. Deconstructing the Subject Condition in terms of cumulative constraint violation. The Linguistic Review 31(1): 73–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0022
Hofmeister, Philip, Casasanto, Laura Staum, & Ivan A. Sag. 2013. Islands in the grammar? Standards of evidence. In J. Sprouse, & N. Hornstein (eds), Experimental Syntax and Island Effects, 42–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035309.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035309.004
Hofmeister, Philip, Casasanto, Laura Staum, & Ivan A. Sag. 2014. Processing effects in linguistic judgment data: (Super-)additivity and reading span scores. Language and Cognition 6: 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2013.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2013.7
Hoot, Bradley, & Shane Ebert. 2025. Syntactic island effects in Spanish: Experimental evidence. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 43: 629–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-024-09633-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-024-09633-5
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Jiménez Fernández, Ángel L. 2009. On the composite nature of subject islands: A phase-based approach. SKY Journal of Linguistics 22: 91–138.
Kayne, Richard S. 1981. ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 93–133.
Keshev, Maayan, & Aya Meltzer-Asscher. 2019. A processing-based account of subliminal wh-island effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37(2): 621–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9416-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9416-1
Kluender, Robert. 2004. Are subject islands subject to a processing account? In V. Chand, A. Kelleher, A. J. Rodríguez, & B. Schmeiser (eds), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 23: 101–125. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Kluender, Robert, & Simone Gieselman. 2013. What’s negative about negative islands? A re-evaluation of extraction from weak island contexts. In J. Sprouse, & N. Hornstein (eds), Experimental syntax and island effects, 186–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035309.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035309.010
Kush, Dave, Lohndal, Terje, & Jon Sprouse. 2018. Investigating variation in island effects: A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36: 743–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z
Lewis, Shevaun, & Colin Phillips. 2015. Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9329-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9329-z
Liddell, Torrin M., & John K Kruschke. 2018. Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79: 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009
López Sancio, Sergio. 2015. Testing syntactic islands in Spanish. M.A. thesis, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
Lu, Jiayi, Frank, Michael C., & Judith Degen. 2024. A meta-analysis of syntactic satiation in extraction from Islands. Glossa Psycholinguistics 3(1): 1–33. http://doi.org/10.5070/G60111425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/G60111425
Maxwell, Scott E., & Harold D. Delaney. 2003. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609243
Ordóñez, Francisco, & Esthela Treviño. 1999. Left Dislocated Subjects and the Pro-Drop Parameter: A Case Study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00020-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00020-5
Pañeda, Claudia, Lago, Sol, Vares, Elena, Veríssimo, João, & Claudia Felser. 2020. Island effects in Spanish comprehension. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 5(1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1058
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E. J. Reuland, & A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sprouse, Jon. 2007. A program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge. PhD thesis, University of Maryland.
Sprouse, Jon. 2023. Acceptability judgments. In J. Sprouse (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Syntax, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198797722.013.1
Sprouse, Jon, Wagers, Matt, & Colin Phillips. 2012. A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 88: 82–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0004
Sprouse, Jon, Caponigro, Ivano, Greco, Ciro, & Carlo Cecchetto. 2016. Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality. PhD thesis, University of Geneva.
Suñer, Margarita. 1991. Indirect questions and the structure of CP: Some consequences. In H. Campos, & F. Martínez-Gil (eds), Current studies in Spanish linguistics, 283–312. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Torrego, Esther. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15(1): 103–129.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In S. Epstein, & N. Hornstein (eds), Working Minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0012
Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 1995. On the nature of Spec/IP and its relevance for scope asymmetries in Spanish and English. In J. Amastae, G. Goodall, M. Montalbetti, & M. Phinney (eds), Contemporary Research in Romance Linguistics, 355–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.123.25uri
Veríssimo, João. 2021. Analysis of rating scales: A pervasive problem in bilingualism research and a solution with Bayesian ordinal models. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24(5): 842–848. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000316
Wexler, Kenneth, & Peter W. Culicover. 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Winckel, Elodie, & Anne Abeillé. 2020. French subject island constraint? A discourse-based HPSG account. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 43(1): 95–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00041.win DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00041.win
Zehr, Jérémy, & Florian Schwarz. 2018. PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2025 Laura Stigliano, Matias Verdecchia, Marisol Murujosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
