Exploring interface phenomena

Confronting methodological challenges

Authors

Abstract

In order to choose among different methods when collecting linguistic data, many different factors should be considered. We will argue that the choice of the most appropriate methods depends on whether a construction applies within one linguistic module (e.g. syntax) or whether it applies at the interface of modules (e.g. syntax and information-structure). While Grammaticality Judgement Tasks (GJT) yield unambiguous results when applied to core-grammatical modules, they often produce inaccurate results when applied to interface-phenomena. Thus, GJTs can be used in order to distinguish between the two types of phenomena, however, in order to get reliable results concerning interface phenomena, other methods seem to be more effective – e.g. a Translation Task with elicited primed items. To demonstrate the suitability of these methods for core vs. interface phenomena, we discuss data on dative clitic doubling (an interface phenomenon) in different Spanish varieties and clitic placement and clitic doubling (core and interface phenomena) in Bulgarian Judeo-Spanish.

Keywords

methods, clitic doubling, clitic placement, interfaces, core grammar

References

Adamou, Evangelia. 2021. The adaptive bilingual mind. Insights from endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Preprint)

Aranovich, Raúl. 2016. A Partitioned Chi-square Analysis of Variation in Spanish Clitic Doubling: The case of dar ‘give’. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 38 (3), 295–313.

Bader, Markus. 2019. Free variation in verb cluster serialization. A harmonic grammar analysis. MS presented at DGfS, Universität Bremen.

Bock, Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6

Bock, Kathryn & Griffin, Zenzi M. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177

Carroll, John M., Bever, Thomas G. & Pollack, Chava R. 1981. The non-Uniqueness of Linguistic Intuitions. Language 57 (2), 368–383.

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. (Studies in generative grammar 9). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: the framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (eds), Step by Step, 89–155. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press, 89-155

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–51. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 104–131. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Compensis, Paul. 2022. Differential Object Indexing in Bulgarian. The Role of Discourse Prominence and Predictability. PhD Dissertation, University of Cologne.

Davies, Mark E. 1997. The evolution of Spanish clitic climbing: a corpus-based approach. Studia neophilologica 69, 251–263.

Di Tullio, Ángela & Zdrojewski, Pablo. 2006. Notas sobre el doblado de clíticos en el español rioplatense: Asimetrías entre objetos humanos y no humanos. Filología 1, 13–44.

Domínguez, Laura. 2013. Understanding interfaces. Second language acquisition and first language attrition of Spanish subject realization and word order variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Dufter, Andreas & Stark, Elisabeth. 2008. Double indirect object marking in Spanish and Italian. In E. Seoane & M. J. Lopez Couso (eds), Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, 111–129. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fanselow, Gisbert & Frisch, Stefan. 2006. Effects of processing difficulty on judgements of acceptability. In G. Fanselow et al. (eds), Gradience in Grammar, 291–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 1999. El Pronombre Personal. Formas y Distribuciones. Pronombres Átonos y Tónicos. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 1209–1273, Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Fischer, Susann. 2014. Revisiting Stylistic Fronting in Old Spanish. In A. Dufter & Á. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, A. (eds), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish, 53–76. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fischer, Susann. 2019. On oblique experiencers in psych-verb constructions. In N. Pomino (ed), Morphosyntactic and semantic aspects of the DP, 109–128. Arbeitspapier 130. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft.

Fischer, Susann 2024. Language contact and the development of Judeo-Spanish Syntax. In D. Savelsberg & L. Minervini (eds), New Perspectives on the Language(s) of the Sephardim, 166–190. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

Fischer, Susann, Gabriel, Christoph & Elena Kireva. 2014. Towards a typological classification of Judeo-Spanish. Analysing syntax and prosody of Sofia judezmo. In K. Braunmüller, S. Höder & K. Kühl (eds), Stability and divergence in language contact. Factors and mechanisms, 77–108. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fischer, Susann & Vega Vilanova, Jorge. 2018. Contact-induced change in Judeo-Spanish. In D. M. Bunis et al. (eds), Caminos de Leche y Miel. Jubilee Volume in Honor of Michael Studemund-Halévy, 135–153. Barcelona: Tirocinio.

Fischer, Susann, Navarro, Mario & Vega Vilanova, Jorge. 2019. The Clitic Doubling Parameter: Development and Distribution of a Cyclic Change. In M. Bouzouita, A. Breitbarth, L. Danckaert & E. Witzenhausen (eds), Cycles in Language Change, 52–71. Oxford: OUP.

Fischer, Susann & Vega Vilanova, Jorge. 2020. Syntactic Questions, Political Answers. In C. Gabriel, A. Pešková & M. Selig (eds), Contact, variation and change in Romance and beyond, 441–459. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

Fischer, Susann, Navarro, Mario & Vega Vilanova, Jorge. 2022. Testing an optional phenomenon. The limitations of GJT. In Mihaela Dogaru et al. (eds), Current Insight into linguistic communicative behaviour, 54–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fischer, Susann, Jorge Vega Vilanova, Bistra Andreeva, Tania Avgustinova, Christoph Gabriel, Jonas Grünke, Diana Klüh & Mitko Sabev. Forthcoming. Patterns and interfaces in language contact: The case of Judeo-Spanish in Bulgaria. Linguistische Berichte.

Franco, Jon & Huidobro, Susana. 2008. Ethical datives, clitic doubling and the theory of pro. In J. Bruhn de Garavito & E. Valenzuela (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 215–224. Somerville: Cascadilla.

Franks, Steven. 2008. Clitic placement, prosody, and the Bulgarian verbal complex. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 16 (1), 91–137.

Gabriel, Christoph, Jonas Grünke & Aldina Quintana. In press. Vocalic alternations in İstanbul Judeo-Spanish. A pilot study on semi-spontaneous speech data. In L. Minervini & F. Savelsberg (eds). New perspectives on Judeo-Spanish and the linguistic history of the Sephardic Jews. Leiden: Brill.

Gerards, David P. & Stark, Elisabeth. 2022. Non-maximal definites in Romance. In M. Bril, M. Coene, T. Ihsane & P. Sleeman (eds), RLLT 19, special issue of Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 8(5)/5, 1–35.

Gómez Seibane, Sara. 2012. La omisión y duplicación de objetos en el castellano del País Vasco. In B. Camus Bergareche & S. Gómez Seibane (eds), El castellano del País Vasco, 193–214. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibersitatea.

Grünke, Jonas, Andreeva, Bistra, Gabriel, Christoph & Sabev, Mitko. 2023. Vocative intonation in language contact Bulgarian Judeo-Spanish. In T. L. Face & M. Armstrong (eds), Special Issue "Prosody in Shared Linguistic Spaces of the Spanish-Speaking World", Languages 2023, 8(4), 284.

Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27 (3), 529–572.

von Heusinger, Klaus & Kaiser, Georg. 2003. The interaction of animacy, definiteness and specificity in Spanish. K. von Heusinger & G. Kaiser (eds), Semantic and syntactic aspects of specificity in Romance languages, 41–65. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.

Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Stylistic fronting. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 530–563. Oxford: Blackwell.

Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1986. Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and Extraction.” In H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, 15–42. Orlando: Academic Press.

Juzek, Tom S. 2016. Acceptability judgement tasks and grammatical theory. PhD Dissertation, University of Oxford.

Leonetti, Manuel. 2008. Specificity in clitic doubling and in Differential Object Marking. Probus 20: 33–66.

Loebell, Helga & Bock, Kathryn. 2003. Structural priming across languages. Linguistics 41(5), 791–824. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.026

Marqueta Gracia, Bárbara. 2014. Los orígenes del marcado diferencial de objetos y la evolución diferenciada de la configuración de los verbos psicológicos en español e inglés. Asociación de Jóvenes Investigadores de Historiografía e Historia de la Lengua Española 12, 26–41.

Masullo, Pascual José. 1992. Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.

Meisel, Jürgen M. 1989. Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In K. Hyltenstam & L.K. Obler (eds.), Bilingualism across the Lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity and Loss, 13–40, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nishida, Chiyo. 2012. A corpus study of Mexican Spanish three-participant constructions with and without clitic doubling. Linguistic Discovery 10 (3), 208–240.

Parodi, Teresa & Larisa Avram. 2018. DOM in language acquisition. An overview. In T. Parodi (ed.), Proceedings of the VIII NEREUS International Workshop “Referential properties of the Romance DP in the context of multilingualism”, 71–85. Arbeitspapier 129, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz

Penny, Ralph. 2002. A History of the Spanish Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pinzin, Francesco & Poletto, Cecilia. 2022. An indefinite maze: on the distribution of partitives and bare nouns in the Northern Italian dialects. In O. Matushansky, L. Roussarie, M. Russo, E. Soare & S. Wauquier (eds), RLLT 17, special issue of Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 8(2)/20, 1–23.

Platzack, Christer. 2001. The vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language 77, 354–377.

Rini, Joel. 1990. Dating the grammaticalisation of the Spanish clitic pronoun, Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 106, 354–370.

Rivero, Maria Luisa. 2010. Los verbos psicológicos con experimentante dativo en español y el cambio histórico. In M. Luján & M. Groppi (eds), Cuestiones gramaticales del español, últimos avances, 167–193. Santiago de Chile: Cuadernos de la ALFAL.

Sampson, Geoffrey R. 2007. Grammar without grammaticality. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3, 1–32.

Savova, Virginia. 2002. Remnant movement, last resort and greed: A minimalist account of Bulgarian clitics. Ms., Johns Hopkins University.

Schroten, Jan. 2010. Clitic doubling in Spanish. Agreement of the third kind. In M. B. Everaert, T. Lentz, H.M.N. De Mulder, et al. (eds). The Linguistics Enterprise: From Knowledge of Language to Knowledge in Linguistics, 313–326. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Schütze, Carson T. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schütze, Carson T. & Sprouse, Jon. 2014. Judgment data. In R. J. Podesva & D. Sharma (eds), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 2008. The limits of convergence. Journal of language contact 2 (1), 213–224.

Sleeman, Petra. 2024. Methods for studying variation in partitives. Linguistic Variation. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.24018.sle

Sorace, Antonella. 2005. Syntactic optionality at interfaces. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (eds), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social, 46–111. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Sorace, Antonella. 2011. Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1: 1–34.

Sorace, Antonella & Serratrice, Ludovica. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210.

Studemund-Halévy, Michael & Susann Fischer. 2013. Audiovisual Documentation of Bulgarian Judezmo. What happens when a language ceases to be used by its speakers? In M. Studemund-Halévy, C. Liebl & I. Vučina Simović (eds.), Sefarad an der Donau. Lengua y literatura de los sefardíes en tierras de los Habsburgo, 407–424. Barcelona: Tirocinio.

Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Tremblay, Annie. 2005. Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgment tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies 24, 129–167.

Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria & Maria Dimitrakopoulou. 2007. The Interpretability Hypothesis: evidence from wh interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23, 215–242.

Ullman, Michael T. 2001. A neurocognitive perspective on language: the declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2(10), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094573

Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 79–123.

Vega Vilanova, Jorge. 2022. On psych verbs and optional clitic doubling in Catalan and other Ibero-Romance languages. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 21, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.388

Weiner, Judith & Labov, William. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1), 29–58.

White, Lydia. 2011. Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua 121(4), 577–590.

Zdrojewski, Pablo & Sánchez, Liliana. 2014. Variation in accusative clitic doubling across three Spanish dialects. Lingua 151, 162–176.

Published

2025-02-19

Downloads