Subjecthood in Spanish meteorological verbs
Abstract
In this paper we provide an analysis of meteorological verbs that allows us to account for their distribution in coordinated structures with a non-overt subject in the second conjunct, of the kind it snowed and covered the tracks, focusing on Spanish data. We argue that verbs like rain and snow, in their pure meteorological uses share with unergatives such as laugh the property of being denominal, and that in Spanish they appear in defective structural configurations that do not license a specifier for vP/VP or TP. We propose that (i) the nominal in the lexical derivation of meteorological predicates remains accessible for a limited range of syntactic processes and (ii) Spanish meteorological sentences are subject-less. Under these assumptions, we provide a novel analysis of apparent ‘subject’ omission in coordinated structures with meteorological predicates.
Keywords
subjects, meteorological verbs, coordinated structures, Extended Projection Principle, argument structureReferences
Aarts, Bas. 1995. Secondary predication in English. In B. Aarts & C. Meyer (eds.), The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, 75–101. Cambridge: CUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parameterizing AGR: word order, V-movement, and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090432389
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Aspects of the syntax of agreement. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930335
Bolinger, Dwight. 1973. Ambient It Is Meaningful Too. Journal of Linguistics 9(2). 261-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700003789
Borsley, Robert. 2005. Against CoordP. Lingua 115: 461–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.011
Bosque, Ignacio. 1989. Clases de sujetos tácitos. In Philologica. Homenaje a Antonio Llorente Maldonado, 87-102. Universi¬dad de Salamanca. https://www.dropbox.com/s/uy5lnpsntgmekxt/_BOSQUE%20SUJETOS%20T%C3%81CITOS.pdf?dl=0
Bosque, Ignacio. 2000a. Objetos que esconden acciones. Una reflexión sobre la sincategorematicidad. In T. Cabré y C. Gelpí (eds.), Lèxic, corpus i diccionaris, 15-30. Barcelona: Universidad Pompeu Fabra. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0x5w8sxbw1m2nix/_IGNACIO%20BOSQUE%20Objetos%20que%20esconden%20acciones.pdf?dl=0
Bosque, Ignacio. 2000b. ¿Qué sabe el que sabe hacer algo? Saber entre los verbos modales. In F. García Murga & K. Korta Carrión (eds.), Palabras, Víctor Sánchez de Zavala in memoriam, 303-323. Vitoria: University of the Basque Country.
Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2008. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
Börjars, Kersti, Rachel Nordlinger & Louise Sadler. 2019. Lexical Functional Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316756584
Branan, Kenyon & Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine. forthcoming. Locality and (minimal) search. To appear in K. Grohmann & E. Leivada (eds.), Cambridge handbook of Minimalism. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005791
Bravo, Ana. 2016. Verbos auxiliares. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, 152-162. London: Routledge.
Bresnan, Joan & Jonni Kanerva. 1989. Locative Inversion in Chicheŵa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1): 1-50.
Bullock, Barbara & Jacqueline Toribio. 2009. Reconsidering Dominican Spanish: Data from the rural Cibao. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 14: 49-73.
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory. Mimeograph, MIT.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step – Essays in Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 3, 104-131. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004
Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of Projection: Extensions. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond, 1-16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, Noam. 2021. Minimalism: where we are now, and where we can hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu 160: 1-41.
Citko, Barbara & Martina Gračanin-Yuksek. 2021. Merge. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12800.001.0001
Contreras, Heles. 1991. On the position of subjects. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure, 63-79. New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373198_005
Dalrymple, Mary, John Lowe & Louise Mycock. 2019. The Oxford Reference Guide to Lexical Functional Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198733300.001.0001
Darden, Bill. 1973. What rains? Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 523-526.
Deal, Amy Rose. 2023. Current models of Agree. Ms. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006504
Demonte, Violeta. 1989. Teoría sintáctica. De las estructuras a la rección. Madrid: Síntesis.
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1976. The syntactic development of Australian languages. In C. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 365-417. University of Texas Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-011
Dixon, Robert. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896
Epstein, Samuel, Hisatsugu Kitahara & T. Daniel Seely. 2020. Unifying labeling under Minimal Search in "single-" and "multiple-specifier" configurations. Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics 22: 1–11. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/641481
Fábregas, Antonio. 2014. El argumento espacio-temporal de ciertos verbos meteorológicos. Ianua 14(1): 1–25.
Fábregas, Antonio. 2019. Periphrases in Spanish: properties, diagnostics, and research questions. Borealis 8(2): 1-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/1.8.2.4944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.2.4944
Falk, Yehuda. 2006. Subjects and Universal Grammar: an explanatory theory. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486265
Fernández Soriano, Olga. 1999. Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: locative and dative subjects. Syntax 2(2): 101-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00017
Fernández Soriano, Olga & Susana Táboas Baylin. 1999. Construcciones impersonales no reflejas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol 2, 1723-1778. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for Case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1-89. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Fodor, Jerry. 1970. Three Reasons for Not Deriving "Kill" from "Cause to Die". Linguistic Inquiry 1(4): 429-438.
Frank, Robert. 2002. Phrase structure composition and syntactic dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5366.001.0001
Frazier, Michael. 2012. Yidiny Coordination Reduction and Syntactic Ergativity. University of Arizona Coyote Papers 20: 19-27.
Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68(3): 553-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/415794
García Fernández, Luis. 2006. Introducción. In L. García Fernández (dir.), Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, 9-58. Madrid: Gredos.
García Fernández, Luis & Diego Gabriel Krivochen. 2019. Las perífrasis verbales en contraste. Madrid: Arco.
García Fernández, Luis, Diego Gabriel Krivochen & Félix Martín Gómez. 2020. Los elementos intermedios en las perífrasis verbales. Lingüística española actual XLII/2: 167-200.
Gibert Sotelo, Elizabeth & Isabel Pujol Payet. 2015. Semantic approaches to the study of denominal parasynthetic verbs in Spanish. Morphology 25: 439-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-015-9267-y
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo. 1999. Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infi¬nitivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2, 3323-3389. Madrid: Espasa.
González Rivera, Melvin. 2023. Sobre los sujetos preverbales caribeños: el caso de Puerto Rico. Archiletras científica 8: 205-218.
Goodall, Grant. 2001. The EPP in Spanish. In W. Davies & S. Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and other subjects, 193-223. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0991-1_8
Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projection. In P. Coopmans, M. Everaert & J. Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, 115-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.197.07gri
Gross, Jonathan, Jay Yellen & Mark Anderson. 2018. Graph theory and its applications DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429425134
[3rd Edition]. crc Press.
Gumiel Molina, Silvia. 2008. Estructura argumental y predicación secundaria. Alcalá de Henares: UAH.
Hacquard, Valentine. 2010. On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18: 79–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9056-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9056-4
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1991. On the syntax of argument structure. Lexicon Project Working Papers 34. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53-109. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1999. A Response to Fodor and Lepore, "Impossible Words?". Linguistic Inquiry 30(3): 453-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554147
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomena to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. PhD thesis, MIT.
Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect, 42-64. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0003
Harley, Heidi. 2011. A Minimalist approach to argument structure. In C. Boeckx (ed.), The handbook of linguistic Minimalism, 427–448. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0019
Herbeck, Peter. 2021. The (null) subject of adjunct infinitives in spoken Spanish. In A. Mucha, J. Hartmann & B. Trawiński (eds.), Non-canonical Control in a cross-linguistic perspective, 259–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.09her
Hernanz, M. Lluisa. 1999. El infinitivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol 2, 2196-2356. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Hernanz, M. Lluisa. 2015. Infinitivo. In J. Gutiérrez Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, 663-678. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713441-59
Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A theory of syntax: minimal operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575129
Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2002. Against the little-v hypothesis. Rivista di grammatica Generativa 27: 107-122.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
Jacobson, Pauline. 1990. Raising as function composition. Linguistics and philosophy 13: 423-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630750
Johnson, David & Paul Postal. 1980. Arc Pair Grammar. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400855551
Joshi, Aravind & Yves Schabes. 1991. Tree-Adjoining Grammars and Lexicalized Grammars. Technical report (CIS), University of Pennsylvania, 445. Available online at http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/445
Karttunen, Lauri & Martin Kay. 1985. Structure sharing with binary trees. Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 133–136. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/981210.981226
Keyser, Samuel & Thomas Roeper. 1984. On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15(3): 381–416.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5
Kratzer, Angelika. 2002. The Event Argument and the Semantics of Verbs. Unpublished manuscript. University of Massachusetts at Amherst. https://works.bepress.com/angelika_kratzer/5/download/
Krejci, Bonnie. 2014. What is raining? English weather it revisited. LSA Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, January 2–5, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/exabs.v0i0.2405
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel. 2019. On trans-derivational operations: Generative Semantics and Tree Adjoining Grammar. Language Sciences 74: 47-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.002
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel. 2023: Syntax on the Edge. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004542310
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel. 2024. Raising to object: a graph-theoretic analysis. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 5(2): 128-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00050.kri
Kroch, Anthony & Aravind Joshi. 1985. The linguistic relevance of a Tree Adjoining Grammar. Available online at http://babel.ling.upenn.edu/papers/faculty/tony_kroch/papers/relevance3.pdf
Lakoff, George. 1965. On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. PhD thesis, Indiana University.
Landau, Idan. 2006. Severing the distribution of PRO from Case. Syntax 9(2): 153-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00087.x
Landau, Idan. 2013. Control in generative grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061858
Lasnik, Howard. 1988. Subjects and the θ-criterion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01791588
Lasnik, Howard. 2013. Shortest Move and Equidistance. Linguistics 611 class notes, University of Maryland. https://terpconnect.umd.edu/~lasnik/LING611%202013/Equidistance.pdf
Lasnik, Howard & Juan Uriagereka. 2005. A course in Minimalist syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
Levin, Beth. 1994. English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Levin, Beth. 2017. Talking about the weather. A case study of precipitation verbs. Talk delivered at the University of Buffalo, September 7, 2017. https://web.stanford.edu/~bclevin/buffalo17weather.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198736134.003.0022
Levin, Beth & Bonnie Krejci. 2019. Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English. Glossa 4(1): 58. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.794
Levinson, Lisa. 2010. Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 135–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9089-x
MacFarlane, John. 2017. Logical constants. In E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/logical-constants/ [Accessed on 22/04/2019]
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Martín Gómez, Félix. 2022. Algunos aspectos de la gramática de ‘para’ en español. PhD thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Martínez Vera, Gabriel A. 2016. Syntactic structure of Spanish parasynthesis: towards a split little-v via affectedness. Isogloss 2(2): 63–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.40
Masullo, Pascual. 1993. Two types of quirky subjects: Spanish versus Icelandic. North East Linguistics Society 23(4): 303-317. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/nels/vol23/iss2/4
Mateu Fontanals, Jaume. 2000. Why can’t we wipe the slate clean? A Lexical-Syntactic Approach to Resultative Constructions. CatWPL 8: 71-95.
Mateu Fontanals, Jaume. 2002. Argument structure: relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. PhD thesis, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
McCawley, James. 1968. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. CLS 4: 71-80.
McCawley, James. 1971. Prelexical syntax. Georgetown Roundtable Meeting: 19-33.
McCawley, James. 2006. Generative Semantics. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics [2nd Ed.], 10-14. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02037-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02037-X
Meulleman, Machteld & Nathalie Stockman. 2013. La inacusatividad en los verbos meteorológicos en español: un análisis comparativo de llover y amanecer. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 90(2): 117–132. https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2013.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/bhs.2013.11
Napoli, Donna. 1988. Subjects and External Arguments. Linguistics and Philosophy 11(3): 323-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632907
Parsons, Terence. 1995. Thematic relations and arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 26(4): 635-662.
Paz, Justin. 2013. La distribución e interpretación de los sujetos léxicos de infinitivo en español: un caso problemático para la teoría del caso. MA thesis, University of Arizona.
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Perlmutter, David & Paul Postal. 1983. Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In D. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar I, 81-128. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pollard, Carl & Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Postal, Paul. 2004. A paradox in English syntax. In P. Postal, Skeptical Linguistics Essays, 15-82. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195166712.003.0002
RAE (Real Academia Española). 1973. Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
RAE-ASALE (Real Academia Española – Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española). 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
Randall, Janet. 2010. Linking: the geometry of argument structure. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rodríguez Remalle, Teresa. 2005. Manual de sintaxis del español. Madrid: Castalia.
Rouveret, Alain. 2018. Aspects of grammatical architecture. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315112497
Rouveret, Alain. 2024. Labelling by type. The Linguistic Review 41(3): 477-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2024-2015
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1989. Weather-verbs and the unaccusative hypothesis. In C. Kirschner & J. DeCesaris (eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics, 313-345. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.60.20ruw
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1991. Language and human experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ryda, Kaitlyn. 2024. ‘What rains?’ Subjecthood in meteorological constructions. MPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
Sag, Ivan, Tom Wasow & Emily Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. Stanford: CSLI.
Sánchez López, Cristina (2016) Pasividad e impersonalidad. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.) Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, 773-784. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713441-68
Sarkar, Anoop & Aravind Joshi. 1997. Handling coordination in a Tree Adjoining Grammar. Technical report, University of Pennsylvania. Available online at https://www2.cs.sfu.ca/~anoop/papers/pdf/tag‑coordination.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/993268.993275
Schmerling, Susan F. 1975. Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, 211-231. New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_009
Schmerling, Susan F. 2018. Sound and grammar: towards a neo-Sapirian theory of language. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378261
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2002. The Synchrony and Diachrony of Romance Infinitives with Subjects. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
Svenonius, Peter. 2002. Introduction. In P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, 3-28. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0001
Travis, Lisa. 2000. The L-syntax/S-syntax boundary: Evidence from Austronesian. In I. Paul, V. Phillips & L. Travis (eds.), Formal issues in Austronesian linguistics, 167-194. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1580-5_9
Uriagereka, Juan. 2008. Syntactic anchors. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481482
Uribe Etxebarría, Myriam. 1992. On the structural positions of the subject in Spanish, their nature and their consequences for quantification. In J. Ortiz de Urbina (ed.), Syntactic theory and Basque syntax, 447-491. San Sebastián: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia.
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203-238.
Williams, Edwin. 1985. PRO and Subject of NP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 297-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154265
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2025 Diego Gabriel Krivochen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
