On the position of dative DPs in Spanish middle-passive sentences
Abstract
This paper examines external possession between a dative possessor and a relational noun in Spanish middle-passive configurations. The dative DP in these contexts must surface preverbally in out-of-the-blue contexts, either by itself –presumably in preverbal subject position–, or along with the theme containing the possessee. When the dative precedes the theme, it cannot be assumed that the former is left-dislocated while the latter sits in preverbal subject position, for this would imply a violation of locality under a low applicative analysis of dative possessors: Tº would skip the possessor argument in Spec,ApplP to probe the possessee in Applº’s complement position to its specifier. Rather, I provide data showing that preverbal DPs –dative or otherwise– in Spanish middle-passive contexts are clitic left-dislocations co-referring with empty pronouns in argument position. I offer a biclausal analysis of these configurations that avoids any potential intervention effects, while at the same time accounting for the extra-sentential properties of these constituents.
Keywords
middle-passive, clitic-left dislocation, dative arguments, localityReferences
Ackema, Peter and Maaike Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry 26(2). 172–197.
Ackema, Peter and Maaike Schoorlemmer. 2006. Middles. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume I, 131–203. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org./10.1002/9780470996591.ch42.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman and Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491.
Armstrong, Grant. 2021. Te puse la mano en el hombro, ‘I put my hand on your shoulder.’ A solution to a puzzling constraint on multiple external possession relations in Spanish. Isogloss: open journal of Romance linguistics 7(10). 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.146.
Arregi, Karlos. 2003. Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 9(1). 31–44.
Baker, Mark. 1995. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barbosa, Pilar. 1996. Clitic placement in European Portuguese and the position of subjects. In Aaron Halpern and Arnold Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, 1–41. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Barbosa, Pilar. 2000. Clitics: a window into the null-subject property. In João Costa (ed.), Essays in Portuguese comparative syntax, 31–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195125757.003.0003.
Barbosa, Pilar. 2009. Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63(1). 2–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01153.x.
Bosque, Ignacio and Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2009. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2024. English middles and implicit arguments. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9(1). 1–46. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9377.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1998. On the deficient/strong opposition in possessive systems. In Artemis Alexiadou and Chris Wilder (eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.22.03car.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2003. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 60–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Conti, Carmen. 2011. Possessive dative revisited: another view of external possession in Spanish. Studia Linguistica 65(2). 170–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2011.01180.x.
Contreras, Heles. 1976. A theory of word order with special reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at Large. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Demonte, Violeta. 1988. El artículo en lugar del posesivo y el control de los sintagmas nominales. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 36(1). 89–108. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v36i1.665.
Demonte, Violeta. 1995. Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus 7. 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1995.7.1.5.
Demonte, Violeta and Olga Fernández Soriano. 2009. Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus 21. 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2009.002.
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Janua linguarum. Series Maior 107. Berlin: Mouton. https://
doi.org/10.1515/9783110822939.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1990. Clitic-doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 351–397.
Escobar, Anna María. 1992. El español andino y el español bilingüe. Semejanzas y diferencias en el uso del posesivo. Lexis 16(2). 189–222.
Español-Echevarría, Manuel. Inalienable possession in copulative contexts and the DP-structure. Lingua 101. 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(96)00023-X.
Fábregas, Antonio. 2011. Rising possessors in Spanish. Iberia: an International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 3(1). 1–34.
Fábregas, Antonio. 2021. SE in Spanish: Properties, structures and analyses. Borealis. An international journal of Hispanic linguistics 10(2). 1–236. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.10.2.5934.
Fábregas, Antonio, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández and Mercedes Tubino. 2017. What’s up with dative experiencers? In Ruth E.V. Lopes, Juanito Ornelas de Avelar and Sonia Cyrino (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12, 29–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.12.03fab.
Fagan, Sarah. 1992. The syntax and semantics of middle constructions. A study with special reference to German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fernández Soriano, Olga. 1999. Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects. Syntax 2(2). 101–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00017.
Fernández Soriano, Olga and Amaya Mendikoetxea. 2013. Non selected dative arguments in Spanish anticausative constructions. The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects 140. 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.140.01fer.
Fodor, Janet Dean and Ivan A. Sag. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5. 355–398.
Frascarelli, Mara. 1997. The phonology of focus and topic in Italian. The Linguistic Review 14. 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1997.14.3.221.
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Giancaspro, David and Liliana Sánchez. 2021. Me, mi, my. Innovation and variability in heritage speakers’ knowledge of inalienable possession. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 31. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1240
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1983. L’emploi possessif de l’article define en français. Langue Française 58. 23–55.
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1985. Inalienable possession. PRO-inclusion and lexical chains. In Jacqueline Guéron, Hans Georg Obenauer and Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation, 42–86. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112328064-004.
Guéron, Jacqueline. 2006. Inalienable possession. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume I, 589–638. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch35
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1999. Los dativos. In Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1855–1930. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Hale, Ken and Samuel J. Keyser. 1986. Explaining and constraining the English middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers 24. 41–57.
Iatridou, Sabine. 1995. Clitics and island effects. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 2. 11–30.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel. 2020. The information structure of high and low datives and their psychological import. In Bozena Rozwadowska and Anna Bondaruk (eds.), Beyond emotions in language. Psychological verbs at the interfaces, 213–244.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.263.06jim.
Keyser, Samuel J. and Thomas Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 3. 381–416.
Kempchinsky, Paula. 1992. The Spanish possessive dative construction: -role assignment and proper government. In Paul Hirschbúhler and E.F.K. Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory. Current issues in linguistic theory 91, 135-149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Kliffer, Michael D. 1983. Beyond syntax: Spanish inalienable possession. Linguistics 21. 759-794.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5.
López, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001.
Masullo, Pascual. 1992. Quirky datives in Spanish and the non-nominative subject parameter. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 16. 82–103.
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. Construcciones con “se”: medias, pasivas e impersonales. In Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1575–1630. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics & Philosophy 27. 661–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3.
Nakamoto, Takeshi. 2010. Inalienable possession constructions in French. Lingua 120(1). 74–102. 603–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.003.
Olarrea, Antxon. 1996. Pre- and postverbal subjects in Spanish: a minimalist account. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.
Olarrea, Antxon. 2012. Word order and information structure. In José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea and Erin O’Rourke (eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch28.
Ordóñez, Francisco and Esthela Treviño. 1999. Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107. 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00020-5.
Ott, Dennis. 2014. An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2). 269–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00155.
Ott, Dennis. 2015. Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery. Linguistic Variation 15(2). 225–290. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.2.04ott.
Ott, Dennis. 2017. The syntax and pragmatics of dislocation: a non-templatic approach. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–13.
Picallo, M. Carme and Gemma Rigau. 1999. El posesivo y las relaciones posesivas. In Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 973–1024. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Rigau, Gemma. 1988. Strong Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 503–511.
Rivero, María Luisa. 1980. On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 363–393.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337.Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473949_016.
Roberts, Ian. 1987. The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rodrigues, Cilene. 2010. Possessor raising through thematic positions. In N. Hornstein and M. Polinsky (eds.), Movement Theory of Control, 119–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.154.05rod
Rodrigues, Cilene. 2023. Possessor raising and structural variations within the vP-domain. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9131.
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2019. Syntactic phenomena in Peruvian Spanish. In Ángel Gallego (ed.), The syntactic variation of Spanish dialects, 245–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634797.003.0009
Sánchez López, Cristina. 2002. Las construcciones con se. Estado de la cuestión. In Cristina Sánchez López (ed.), Las construcciones con se, 18–167. Madrid: Visor Libros.
Sánchez López, Cristina. 2007. The possessive dative and the syntax of affected arguments. Cuadernos de lingüística del Instituto Universitario de Investigación Ortega y Gasset 14. 153–173.
Saxon, Leslie and Andrea Wilhelm. 2016. The ‘possessed noun suffice’ and possession in two Northern Dene (Athabaskan) languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 82(1). 35–70.
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts, 126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126.
Stroik, Thomas. 1992. Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23(1). 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553986.
Suárez-Palma, Imanol. 2019. Stuck in the middle: Dative arguments and middle-passive constructions in Spanish. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona dissertation.
Suárez-Palma, Imanol. 2020. Applied arguments in Spanish inchoative middle constructions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1): 9. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.827.
Suárez-Palma, Imanol. 2022. Middle formation and inalienability in Asturian. In Guillermo Lorenzo (ed.), Sound, syntax and contact in the languages of Asturias, 131–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.36.07sua.
Suárez-Palma, Imanol. 2024. Inalienable possession (and lack thereof) in Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17(1). 109–136. https://doi.org./10.1515/shll-2024-2005.
Suñer, Margarita. 1982. Syntax and semantics of Spanish presentational sentence-types. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Ticio, Emma. 2005. Locality and anti-locality in Spanish DPs. Syntax 8(3). 229–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00080.x.
Tubino, Mercedes. 2007. Preverbal datives in Spanish. How quirky are they? An Agree analysis of gustar. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona dissertation.
Vergnaud, Jean Roger and María Luisa Zubizarreta. 1992. The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry 23(4). 595–652.
Villa-García, Julio. 2012. Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish. Probus 24. 257–314. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2012-0011.
Villa-García, Julio. 2015. The syntax of multiple-que sentences in Spanish: Along the left periphery (Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.2.
Villa-García, Julio and Dennis Ott. 2022. Recomplementation as a paratactic phenomenon: Evidence from Spanish and English. Journal of Linguistics. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000433.
Villalba, Xavier. 2000. The syntax of sentence periphery. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1999. Las funciones informativas: tema y foco. In Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 4215–4244. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Imanol Suárez-Palma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
