Accounting for asymmetries in cleft sentence use
Syntactic and functional preferences in L1 and L2 Italian and French
Abstract
Cleft constructions exhibit variations in their frequency of usage, influenced by different constraints and preferences at various levels, such as syntax or function. Additionally, these constraints and purposes may differ across languages. This study aims to clarify the factors influencing the use of cleft constructions among speakers of two closely related languages, Italian and French. By analyzing the behaviors of native speakers, we also formulate hypotheses regarding how these factors manifest in the speech of second language (L2) learners of these languages. Our findings highlight a difference in how native speakers handle the functional parameter in the use of clefts, with Italian speakers (but not French speakers) distinguishing between identification and correction. The linguistic proximity between Italian and French facilitates the acquisition of this complex structure among learners. However, other factors contribute to differing receptions of asymmetries in L2, including acquisitional phenomena such as the predominance of communicative need and the difficulty in incorporating the functional parameter.
Keywords
cleft constructions, information structure, second language acquisition, cross-l, RomanceReferences
Authier, Jean Marc, & Liliane Haegeman. 2019. The Syntax of Mirative Focus Fronting: Evidence from French. In D. L. Arteaga (ed.), Contributions of Romance Languages to Current Linguistic Theory, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 95 (3). doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11006-2_3
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Belletti, Adriana. 2005. Answering with a “cleft”: The role of the null subject parameter and the VP periphery. In L. Brugè, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, W. Schweikert, & G. Turano (eds), Contributions to the Thirtieth “Incontro di Grammatica Generativa”, Venice, February 26-28, 2004.
Belletti, Adriana. 2008. Answering Strategies: New Information Subjects and the Nature of Clefts. In A. Belletti (ed), Structures and Strategies. New York: Routledge.
Belletti, Adriana. 2015. The focus map of clefts: Extraposition and Predication. In U. Shlonsky (ed), Beyond functional sequence: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 10, 42–60. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.001.0001
Belletti, Adriana, & Giuliano Bocci. 2024. Subject versus object clefts: A fresh perspective on a robust asymmetry. In C. Bonan & A. Ledgeway (eds), It-Clefts: Empirical and Theoretical Surveys and Advances, 81–104. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Benazzo, Sandra, & Cecilia Andorno. 2017. Is it really easier to acquire a closely- related language? A study on the expression of iteration and continuation in L2 French. In M. Howard & P. Leclercq (ed), Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives, 105–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.05ben
Bertollo, Sabrina. 2024. What is it that requires or constrains clefts? (Dis)Favouring factors for clefting in Germanic and Romance. In C. Bonan & A. Ledgeway (eds), It-Clefts: Empirical and Theoretical Surveys and Advances, 35-80. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bonan, Caterina, & Adam Ledgeway (eds). 2024. It-Clefts: Empirical and Theoretical Surveys and Advances. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi.org/10.1515/9783110734140
Brunetti, Lisa, Bott, Stefan, Costa, Joan, & Enric Vallduví. 2011. A multilingual annotated corpus for the study of information structure. In M. Konopka, J. Kubczak, C. Mair, F. Sticha & U. Wassner (eds), Proceedings of Grammar and Corpora 2009, Third international Conference, Mannheim, Allemagne. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Cerruti, Massimo. 2010. Strutture dell’italiano regionale. Morfosintassi di una varietà diatopica in prospettiva sociolinguistica. Berlin: Peter Lang Verlag. 10.3726/978-3-653-00227-0
Clech-Darbon, Anne, Rebuschi, Georges, & Annie Rialland. 1999. Are there cleft sentences in French? In G. Rebuschi & L. Tuller (eds), The Grammar of Focus, 83−118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2021. The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of focus in syntax. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 3.
Cruschina, Silvio, & Eva Maria Remberger. 2017. Focus Fronting. In A. Dufter, & E. Stark (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, 502–535. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-014
De Cesare, Anna Maria. 2017. Cleft Constructions in Romance: definition, types, and parameters of variation. In A. Dufter, & E. Stark (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, 536–568. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-015
De Cesare, Anna Maria, Garassino, Davide, Marco, Rocío Agar, Albom, Aan, & Doriana Cimmino. 2016. Sintassi marcata dell’italiano dell’uso medio in prospettiva contrastiva con il francese, lo spagnolo, il tedesco e l’inglese. Bern-Frankfurt: Peter Lang. doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05938-0
De Paolis, Bianca Maria, Santiago, Fabián, & Cecilia Andorno. 2022. Syntaxe ou prosodie? une étude préliminaire sur l’expression de la focalisation étroite par les apprenants italophones de français L2. Actes des XXXIVe Journées d’Études sur la Parole. ISCA Archives, 851–860. doi.org/ doi: 10.21437/JEP.2022-90
De Paolis, Bianca Maria. 2024. Focus-induced variations in prosody and word-order in native and non-native Italian and French. PhD thesis, Università di Torino / Université Paris 8.
Destruel, Émilie, & Bryan Donaldson. 2017. Second language acquisition of pragmatic inferences: Evidence from the French c’est-cleft. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3): 703–732. doi:10.1017/S0142716416000400
Destruel, Émilie, & Leah Velleman. 2014. Refining contrast: empirical evidence from the English it-cleft. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 10(1): 197–214.
Doetjes, Jenny, Rebuschi, Georges, & Annie Rialland. 2004. Cleft Sentences. In F. Corblin, & H. de Swart (eds), Handbook of French semantics, 529−552. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Dufter, Andreas. 2009. Clefting and discourse organization: comparing Germanic and Romance. In A. Dufter, & D. Jacob (eds), Focus and Background in Romance Languages, 83–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.05duf
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana, & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1): 67–88. doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002
Gabriel, Christoph. 2007. Fokus im Spannungsfeld von Phonologie und Syntax. Eine Studie zum Spanischen. Frankfurt: Vervuert. doi.org/10.31819/9783964561954
Gabriel, Christoph. 2010. On Focus, Prosody, and Word Order in Argentinian Spanish. A Minimalist OT Account. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, Special issue 4: 183–222.
Garassino, Davide. 2014. Cleft sentences. Italian-English in contrast. In A. M. De Cesare (ed), Frequency, Forms and Functions of Cleft Constructions in Romance and Germanic: Contrastive, Corpus-Based Studies, 101–138. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi.org/10.1515/9783110361872.101
Gass, Susan, & Alison Mackay. 2002. Frequency effects and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24: 249–260. doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002097
Givón, Talmy. 1989. The pragmatics of word order: predictability, importance and attention. In M. Hammond, E.A. Moravcsik, & J. Wirth (eds), Studies in Syntactic Typology (Typological Studies in Language 17), 243–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Helland, Hans Petter, Larrivée, Pierre, & Nelly Foucher Stenkløv. 2023. Les subordonnants relatifs qui et que en français langue étrangère. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 13(1): 1–12. doi.org/10.15845/bells.v13i1.3835
Jarvis, Scott, & Aneta Pavlenko. 2007. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. London: Routledge.
Katz, Stacey. 2000. Categories of C’est-Cleft Constructions. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 45(3/4). 1001−1021.
Keenan, Edward L., & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63-99.
Keenan, Edward L., & Sarah Hawkins. 1987. The Psychological Validity of the Accessibility Hierarchy. In E.L. Keenan (ed), Universal grammar: 15 essays, 60-85. London: Croom Helm.
Lahousse, Karen, & Morgane Jourdain. 2024. The emergence and early development of c’est ‘it is’ clefts in French L1. In C. Bonan, & A. Ledgeway (eds), It-Clefts: Empirical and Theoretical Surveys and Advances, 135-156. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi.org/10.1515/9783110734140-006
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics, 39: 463–516. doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.021
Leclercq, Pascale, Edmonds, Amanda, & Heather Hilton (eds). 2014. Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Vol. 78. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Roggia, Carlo Enrico. 2008. Frasi scisse in italiano e in francese orale: evidenze dal c-oral-rom. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 15:9–29.
Samo, Giuseppe, & Paola Merlo. 2021. Intervention effects in clefts: a study in quantitative computational syntax. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6(1):145. doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5742
Samo, Giuseppe, & Paola Merlo. 2024. Distributed computational models of intervention effects: A study on cleft structures in French. In C. Bonan, & A. Ledgeway (eds), It-Clefts: Empirical and Theoretical Surveys and Advances, 157-180. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schwartz, Misha, & Heather Goad. 2017. Indirect positive evidence in the acquisition of a subset grammar. Language Acquisition, 24: 234–264. doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1187616
Tremblay, Annie, & Meryl D. Garrison, 2010. Cloze tests: A tool for proficiency assessment in research on L2 french. In M. T. Prior (ed), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum, 73–88. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, MA.
Van den Steen, Katleen. 2005. Cleft constructions in French and Spanish. In Nicole Delbecque , Johan van der Auwera and Dirk Geeraerts (eds), Perspectives on Variation, 275–290. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. doi.org/10.1515/9783110909579.275
Vedder, Ineke. 2008. Competenza pragmatica e complessità sintattica in italiano L2: l’uso dei modificatori nelle richieste. Linguistica e Filologia, 25(1):99–123.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Bianca Maria De Paolis, Cecilia Andorno, Sandra Benazzo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
