The syllabification of /sw/ in Italian and the phonological status of /w/

Authors

Abstract

This study investigates the phonetics and phonology of word-initial /sw/ clusters in Italian, aiming to discern the syllabic parsing of the sequence and the phonological status of the glide /w/. Previous studies have reported a dual status of /w/ in Italian, consonantal in loanwords versus vocalic in native lexemes, apparently dependent on the graphemic form of /w/, i.e. ⟨w⟩ and ⟨u⟩. The /s/-voicing pattern before the glide was used as a diagnostic to determine the glide’s status: a consonantal glide should trigger /s/-voicing, like any other voiced consonant in Italian. Differently, vocalic glides should pattern like vowels in being unable to trigger the voicing of /s/. Two hypotheses are presented: the Loanword Phonology Hypothesis (LPH), which predicts /w/ to systematically behave as a consonant in loanwords, while the Orthographic Hypothesis (OH) predicts so only when the glide is written ⟨w⟩. The analysis was based on acoustic data originally collected, focusing on the outputs of /s/. Results show that OH better accounts for the pattern observed than LPH. Phonological implications of this finding are discussed.

Keywords

sibilant, labiovelar glide, syllable, phonology, orthography, Italian

References

Baltazani, Mary. 2006. On /s/-voicing in Greek. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greek Linguistics: 1–12.

Baroni, Antonio. 2014. Strength-based faithfulness and the sibilant /s/ in Italian. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 1: 29–53.

Baroni, Antonio. 2020. Le semivocali in francese e italiano. Alternanza con le vocali alte e selezione dell’articolo. In M. Bacquin, P. Bernardini, V. Egerland, & J. Granfeldt (eds), Écrits sur les langues romanes à la mémoire d’Alf Lombard, 17–42. Media-Tryck. Lund: Media-Tryck, Lund University.

Bassetti, Bene. 2017. Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 43(11): 1835–1842. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000417.

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2010. Sillaba. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica 9(1): 1–9.

Bertinetto, Pier Marco, & Michele Loporcaro. 2005. The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 35(2): 131–151.

Boersma, Paul, & Silke Hamann. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. In A. Calabrese, & W.L. Wetzels (eds), Loan Phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory IV), 11–58. Amsterdam / Philadephia: John Benjamins.

Boyd, Jeremy. 2006. On the representational status of/s/-clusters. San Diego Linguistics Papers 2: 219–252.

Broniś, Olga. 2016. Italian vowel paragoge in loanword adaptation. Phonological analysis of the Roman variety of Standard Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 25–68.

Brozbă, Gabriela, & Roxana Ungureanu. 2018. The phonological adaptation of loanwords in Italian. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2): 31–52.

Buben, Vladimir. 1935. Influence de l’orthographe sur la prononciation du français. Paris: Droz.

Calabrese, Andrea, & W. Leo Wetzels. 2009. Loan phonology: Issues and controversies. In A. Calabrese, & W.L. Wetzels (eds), Loan Phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory IV), 1–10. Amsterdam / Philadephia: John Benjamins.

Canepari, Luciano. 1999. Il DiPI. Bologna: Zanichelli.

Canalis, Stefano. 2018. The status of Italian glides in the syllable. In R. Petrosino, P: Cerrone, & H. van der Hulst (eds), From Sounds to Structures: Beyond the Veil of Maya (Studies in Generative Grammar), vol. 135, 3–29. Berlin - Boston: de Gruyter.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1986. Length, syllabification and the phonological cycle in Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8(1): 5–34.

Clements, George N., & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1983. CV Phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Cohen, Evan Gary. 2009. The role of similarity in phonology: Evidence from loanword adaptation in Hebrew. Ph.D. thesis, Tel Aviv University.

Cossu, Piero. 2023. Il trattamento di/w/in posizione iniziale in italiano è influenzato dall’ortografia? Indizi dalla selezione dell’articolo maschile. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 61(1): 161–198.

Davidson, Andrew. 2019. Writing: the re-construction of language. Language Science 72: 134–149.

Davis, Stuart. 1990. Italian onset structure and the distribution of il and lo. Linguistics 28: 43–55.

Ehri, Linnea C., & Lee S. Wilce. 1980. The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics 1: 371–385.

Erasmi, Gabriele. 1983. Le parole straniere in italiano: Adattamento morfologico, fonetico e grafico. American Association of Teachers of Italian 60(3): 235–245.

Fagan, Sarah M.B. 2020. Evidence for sk in German as a Complex Segment. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32(1): 83–95.

Faust, Noam, Nicola Lampitelli, & Shanti Ulfsbjorninn. 2018. Articles of Italian unite! Italian definite articles without allomorphy. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63(3): 359–385.

Friesner, Michael, L. 2009. The adaptation of Romanian loanwords from Turkish and French. In A. Calabrese & W.L. Wetzels (eds), Loan Phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory IV), 115–130. Amsterdam / Philadephia: John Benjamins.

Frost, Ram, & Johannes C. Ziegler. 2007. Speech and spelling interaction: The interdependence of visual and auditory word recognition. In S.-A. Rueschemeyer, & G. Gaskell (eds), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 107–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goad, Heather. 2011. The representation of sC clusters. In M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, & K. Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, vol. 2, 898–923. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Goad, Heather. 2012. sC clusters are (almost always) coda-initial. The Linguistic Review 29: 335–373.

Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Goldsmith, John. 2011. The syllable. In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle & A.C.L. Yu (eds), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, second edition, 164–196. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Goswami, Usha. 2002. Phonology, reading development, and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of dyslexia 52: 139–163.

Goswami, Usha, Ziegler, Johannes C., & Ulla Richardson. 2005. The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: a comparison of English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 92: 345–365.

Green, Antony Dubach. 2003. Extrasyllabic consonants and onset well-formedness. In C. Féry & R. van de Vijver (eds), The syllable in Optimality Theory, 238–253. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hale, Mark, & Charles Reiss. 2000. Phonology as cognition. In N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr, & G. Docherty (eds), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, 161–184. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Hamann, Silke, & Ilaria E. Colombo. 2017. A formal account of the interaction of orthography and perception: English intervocalic consonants borrowed into Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35(3): 683–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9362-3.

Huszthy, Bálint. 2016. Arguments against the heterosyllabicity of/sC/clusters in Italian phonology. Proceedings of the CECIL’S Olomouc: Palacý University: 74–85.

Huszthy, Bálint. 2019. How can Italian phonology lack voice assimilation? Ph.D. thesis, Pázmány Péter Catholic University.

Huszthy, Bálint. 2021. Italian preconsonantal s-voicing is not regressive voice assimilation. The Linguistic Review 38(1): 33–63.

Itô, Junko, & Armin Mester. 1999. Japanese phonology. Constraint domains and structure preservation. J. Goldsmith (ed.), A Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell: 817–838.

Itô, Junko, & Armin Mester. 2017. The phonological lexicon. In N. Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 62–100. Cambridge: Blackwell. doi.org/10.1002/9781405166225.ch3

Janni, Pietro. 1992. Lo Swatch. Lingua Nostra 53: 86–87.

Jansen, Wouter. 2007. Phonological ‘voicing’, phonetic voicing, and assimilation in English. Language Sciences 29(2/3): 270–293.

Kaye, Jonathan. 1992. Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences. SOAS working papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2: 293–313.

Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1990. Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology. Phonology 7(2): 193–231.

Krämer, Martin. 2009. The phonology of Italian. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

LaCharité, Darlene, & Carol Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2): 223–258.

Levi, Susannah. 2011. Glides. In M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K. Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675713000079

Levitt, Jesse. 1978. The influence of orthography on phonology: a comparative study (English, French, Spanish, Italian, German). Linguistics 208: 43–67.

Lisker, Leigh, & Arthur S. Abramson. 1964. A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements. Word: 384–422.

Marotta, Giovanna. 1985. Modelli e misure ritmiche: la durata vocalica in italiano. Bologna: Zanichelli.

Marotta, Giovanna. 1988. The Italian dipthongs and the autosegmental framework. In P.M. Bertinetto, & M. Loporcaro (eds), Certamen Phonologicum, vol. I, 389–420. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.

Marotta, Giovanna. 1993. Selezione dell’articolo e sillaba in Italiano: un’interazione totale? Studi di grammatica italiana 15: 255–296.

Marotta, Giovanna. 1995. La sibilante preconsonantica in italiano: questioni teoriche ed analisi sperimentale. In R. Ajello, & S. Sani (eds), Scritti linguistici e filologici in onore di T. Bolelli, 393–438. Pisa: Pacini.

Marotta, Giovanna, & Laura Vanelli. 2021. Fonologia e prosodia dell’italiano. Roma: Carocci.

Martin, Alexander, van Heugten, Marieke, Kager, René, & Sharon Peperkamp. 2022. Marginal contrast in loanword phonology: Production and perception. Laboratory Phonology 13(1): 1–36.

McCarthy, John J. 1985. Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. New York: Garland.

Morais, José. 1987. Phonetic awareness and reading acquisition. Psychological Research 49: 147–152.

Morandini, Diego. 2007. The phonology of loanwords into Italian. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.

Muneaux, Mathilde, & Johannes Ziegler. 2004. Locus of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Novel insights from the neighbour generation task. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(5): 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000052

Nespor, Marina, & Irene Vogel. 1982. Prosodic domains of external sandhi rule. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds), The structure of phonological representations. Part I., 225–255. Dordrecht: Foris.

Nocchi, Nadia, & Lorenzo Filipponio. 2012. Lo vuoi co[z]ì o co[s]ì? A sociophonetic study on sibilants in the regional Italian of Livorno (Tuscany). In S. Calamai, C. Celata, & L. Ciucci (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop “Sociophonetics, at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication” Pisa, December 14th-15th, 2010, 53–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Olson, David R. 1996. The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Perre, Laetitia, Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Montant, Marie, & Johannes C. Ziegler. 2009. Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research 1275: 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.018

Petrosino, Roberto. 2018. Allomorphy of Italian determiners at the morphology- phonology interface. In R. Petrosino, P. Cerrone, & H. van der Hulst (eds), From Sounds to Structures. Beyond the veil of Maya, 295–328. Berlin / Boston: de Gruyter.

Polgárdi, Krisztina. 2022. The representation of sC-clusters: A Strict CV analysis. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7(1): 1–29.

Pratt, Chris. 1980. El anglicismo en el español peninsular contemporaneo. Madrid: Gredos.

Pustka, Elissa. 2022. Loanword phonology in Romance. In C. Gabriel, R. Gess, & T. Meisenburg (eds), Manual of Romance Phonetics and Phonology, 503–527. Berlin - Boston: de Gruyter.

R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical 1421 Computing. https://www.R- project.org/.

Rando, Gaetano. 1970. The assimilation of English loan-words in Italian. Italica 47(2): 129–142.

Read, Charles, Zhang, Yu-Fei, & Bao Ding. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sound depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition 24: 31–44.

Repetti, Lori. 1991. A Moraic Analysis of Raddoppiamento Fonosintattico. Rivista di Linguistica 3: 307–330.

Repetti, Lori. 1993. The Integration of Foreign Loans in the Phonology of Italian. Italica, Summer 70(2): 182–196.

Repetti, Lori. 2012. Consonant-Final Loanwords and Epenthetic Vowels in Italian. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 11: 167–188.

Repetti, Lori. 2020. The masculine singular definite article in Italian: The role of the syllable. Italian Journal of Linguistics 32(2): 209–232.

Scheer, Tobias. 2004. A lateral theory of phonology. Vol 1: What is CVCV, and why should it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Seidenberg, Mark S., & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 1979. Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human learning and memory 5(6): 546–554.

Seidenberg, Mark S., & James L. McClelland. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96(4): 523–568.

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syllable. The structure of phonological representations 2: 337–383.

Slowiaczek, Louisa M., Soltano, Emily G., Wieting, Shani J., & Karyn L. Bishop. 2003. An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 56(2): 233–262.

Solé, Maria-Josep. 2010. Effects of syllable position on sound change: An aerodynamic study of final fricative weakening. Journal of Phonetics 38: 289– 305

Steriade, Donca. 1982. Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification processes. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Stone, Gregory O., Vanhoy, Mickie, & Guy C. van Orden. 1997. Perception is a two- way street: feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of memory and language 36: 337–359.

Svolacchia, Marco. 2019. Ancora ‘s impura’ (in cauda veritas). Quaderni di lavoro ASIt 22: 53–88.

Taft, Marcus. 2006. Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: Evidence from non-rhotic speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(1): 67–78. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-005-9004-5.

Taft, Marcus, Castles, Anne, Lazendic, Goran, & Minh Nguyen-Hoan. 2008. Automaticactivation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory and Language 58(2): 366–379.

Treiman, Rebecca, & Marie Cassar. 1997a. Spelling acquisition in English. C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (eds), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 61–80.

Treiman, Rebecca, & Marie Cassar. 1997b. Can children and adults focus on sound as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task? Developmental Psychology 33: 771–780.

Van Orden, Guy C., & Stephen D. Goldinger. 1994. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20(6): 1269–1291.

Vendelin, Inga, & Sharon Peperkamp. 2006. The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua 116: 996–1007.

Veer, Bart van der. 2006. The Italian ‘Mobile Diphthongs’. A Test Case for Experimental Phonetics and Phonological Theory. LOT. Utrecht.

Veijer, Jerome van de. 1996. Segmental structure and complex segments. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Vennemann, Theo. 1982. Zur Silbenstruktur der deutschen Standardsprache. Silben, Segmente, Akzente. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Ventura, Paulo, Morais, José, Pattamadilok, Chotiga, & Régine Kolinski. 2004. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(1): 57–95, DOI: 10.1080/01690960344000134

Wiese, Richard. 1996. The Phonology of German. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Wiltshire, Caroline, & Elisa Maranzana. 1999. Geminates and clusters in Italian and Piedmontese: a case for OT ranking. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory): 289–304.

Ziegler, Johannes C., & Ludovic Ferrand. 1998. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5(4): 683–689.

Ziegler, Johannes C., Muneaux, Mathilde, & Jonathan Grainger. 2003. Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 779–793.

Ziegler, Johannes C., & Usha Goswami. 2005. Reading Acquisition, Developmental Dyslexia, and Skilled Reading Across Languages: A Psycholinguistic Grain Size Theory. Psychological Bulletin 131(1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3.

Published

2024-12-14

Downloads