Mapping focus to prosody in Italian

The case of wh-questions

Authors

Abstract

Italian wh-questions with bare wh-elements are characterized by an exceptional prosodic pattern, whereby the nuclear pitch accent (NPA) is assigned neither to the wh-element nor to the default rightmost position, but it rather falls on the lexical verb, even though this is not semantically interpreted as a focus. Based on evidence from production, in previous work we argue that the NPA assignment is a reflex of the cyclic syntactic derivation, being sensitive to a syntactic [focus] feature borne by the wh-phrase. The striking dissociation between the NPA and focal interpretation that emerges from the production data raises the question of whether Italian hearers are sensitive to this marked prosodic pattern in understanding a question. To address this question, we carried out a comprehension experiment, where we manipulated the position of the NPA in biclausal wh-questions including two verbs: the verb of the matrix clause and the embedded verb. The results of this experiment confirm the psychological reality of our theoretical analysis, suggesting that hearers exploit prosodic cues to parse the sentence and to assign the correct interpretation to structures that only differ at the surface level with respect to the position of the NPA.

Keywords

focus, wh-questions, cyclic movement, Italian, prosody, main prominence, nuclear pitch accent, comprehension experiment

References

Aboh, Enoch O. 2004. The Morphosyntax of Complement-Head Sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159905.001.0001

Avesani, Cinzia. 1990. A contribution to the synthesis of Italian intonation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. I, 833–836. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.1990-106

Badan, Linda & Claudia Crocco. 2021. Italian wh-questions and the low periphery. Linguistics 59(3): 757–784. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0059

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Cruschina. 2017. Two types of subject inversion in Italian wh-questions. In Ion Giurgea (ed), Information structure and the left periphery, Special issue of Revue roumaine de linguistique 62(3): 233–252.

Bocci, Giuliano, Silvio Cruschina & Luigi Rizzi. 2021. On some special properties of why in syntax and prosody. In Gabriela Soare (ed), Why is ‘why’ Unique? Its syntactic and semantic properties, 293–316. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110675160-011

Bocci, Giuliano, Valentina Bianchi & Silvio Cruschina. 2021. Focus in wh-questions. Evidence from Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39(2): 405‒455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09483-x

Bocci, Giuliano, Valentina Bianchi & Silvio Cruschina. 2022. Weak wh-elements and the prosody of Italian wh-questions. Festschrift in honour of Cecilia Poletto’s 60th birthday, Volume 1. Quaderni di lavoro ASIt (Antlante Sintattico d’Italia) 24: 35–54. http://asit.maldura.unipd.it/papers.html#a22

Bocci, Giuliano. 2013. The Syntax–Prosody Interface: A cartographic perspective with evidence from Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.204

Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2024. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.3.10, retrieved 3 May 2023 from http://www.praat.org/

Calabrese, Andrea. 1982. Alcune ipotesi sulla struttura informazionale della frase. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 13: 489–526.

Calabrese, Andrea. 2005. Markedness and Economy in a Derivational Model of Phonology. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197600

Calabrese, Andrea. 2019. Morpho-Phonological Investigations: A Theory of PF. From Syntax to Phonology in Sanskrit and Italian Verbal Systems. Manuscript, University of Connecticut. Available at: https://andrea-calabrese.uconn.edu/publications/

Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: On the three grammatical classes. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Clements, George N. 1984. Principles of tone assignment in Kikuyu. In George N. Clements & John A. Goldsmith (eds), Autosegmental Studies in Bantu Tone. 281–339. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864465.281

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), Step by Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On Phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cruschina, Silvio. 2021. Focus fronting vs. wh-movement: Evidence from Sardinian. In Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen & Luisa Meroni (eds), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 32, Utrecht, 50–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Del Puppo, Giorgia. 2016. On the Acquisition of Focus: Elicited production of cleft sentences and wh-questions by school-aged, Italian-speaking children. PhD dissertation, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.

Duryagin, Pavel. 2020. On some factors affecting the choice of tune in Russian wh-questions. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, (May 25–28, 2000, Tokyo, Japan), 235–239. 10.21437/speechprosody.2020-48

Elordieta, Gorka. 2008. An overview of theories of the syntax-phonology interface. Anuario Del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 42(1): 209–286. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/49426

Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg. 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9500-1

Georgi, Doreen. 2017. Patterns of movement reflexes as the result of the order of Merge and Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 48(4): 585–626. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00255

Gili Fivela, Barbara, Cinzia Avesani, Marco Barone, Giuliano Bocci, Claudia Crocco, Mariapaola D’Imperio, Rosa Giordano, Giovanna Marotta, Michelina Savino, and Patrizia Sorianello. 2015. Intonational phonology of the regional varieties of Italian. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), Intonation in Romance, 140–197. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0005

Jitcă, Doina, Vasile Apopei, Otilia Păduraru & Samuil Maruşca. 2015. Transcription of Romanian intonation. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), Intonational Variation in Romance, 284–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0008

Korsah, Sampson & Andrew Murphy. 2016. What can tone tell us about successive-cyclic movement? Evidence from Asante Twi. In Christopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds), Proceedings of NELS (North East Linguistic Society) 46: 227–240.

Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second edition published in 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808814

Marotta, Giovanna. 2001. I toni accentuali nelle interrogative aperte (wh-) dell’italiano di Lucca. In Camilla Bettoni, Antonio Zampolli & Daniela Zorzi (eds), Atti del II congresso di studi dell’Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 175–194. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.

Marotta, Giovanna. 2002. L’intonation des énoncés interrogatifs ouverts dans l’italien toscan. In Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds), Proceeding of Speech Prosody 2000: An international conference, 475–478. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.

Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Prince Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2020. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Reinhart, Tania. 2006. Interface Strategies. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed), Elements of Grammar. Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7

Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473949_016

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1996. The prosodic structure of function words. In James L. Morgan and Katherine Demuth (eds), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, 187–213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 435–483. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch14

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2): 219–255. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554048

Zehr, Jérémy & Florian Schwarz. 2022. PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832

Published

2024-12-14

Downloads