The roots and structures of possessive noun classes

Authors

  • Grant Armstrong University of Wisconsin-Madison

Abstract

In both the typological literature and literature on formal syntax and semantics, a division is drawn between nouns that are inalienably possessed such as body parts and kinship terms and nouns that are alienably possessed such as owned materials. In this paper I re-examine data from Spanish and Mayan languages and propose an analysis of it that emphasizes two important points regarding the roots and structures associated with inalienable and alienable possession. I first make the novel observation that various types of external possession in Spanish provide clear support for the idea that  inalienable possession is structurally less complex than alienable possession: inalienable possessive relations are introduced within a complex n head that consists of a root and nominalizing head. I then explore attributive possession in Mayan languages and highlight data that leads to conflicting conclusions about where, precisely, inalienable relations such as part-of and kin-of are encoded: on n heads or on roots. I outline avenues for future research with the Mayan language family that may help elucidate which of these two analyses may ultimately be correct.

Keywords

(in)alienable possession, roots, Distributed Morphology, Mayan, Spanish

References

Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical Plurals: A Morpho-semantic Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Adamson, Luke. 2024. Gender assignment is local: On the relation between grammatical gender and inalienable possession. Language 100.2:218-264.

https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2024.a929736

Adell, Eric. 2019. The phonetics, phonology and morphology of Chajul Ixil (Mayan). PhD Dissertation, UT Austin.

Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Aissen, Judith, Nora England & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.). 2017. The Mayan Languages. New York: Routledge.

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2003. Some notes on the structure of alienable and inalienable possessors. In M. Coene & Y. D’Hulst (eds.), From NP to DP (Volume 2). The Expression of Possession in Noun Phrases, 167-188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.56.12ale

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2019. On plurals and plurality. Selected Papers of ISTAL 23. 3–18.

Alexiadou, Artemis & Terje Londahl. 2017. On the division of labor between roots and functional structure. In R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco & Á. Gallego (eds.) The Verbal Domain, 85-102. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0004

Asociación de academias de la lengua española (AALE) y Real Academia Española (RAE). 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.

Barker, Chris. 1995. Possessive descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Barker, Chris. 2011. Possessives and relational nouns. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner, eds., Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1109–1130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110589443-006

Bennett, Ryan, Jessica Coon & Robert Henderson. 2016. Introduction to Mayan Linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 10: 455-468.

https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12159

Bricker, Victoria, Eleuterio Po’ot & Ofelia Dzul de Po’ot. 1998. A Dictionary of The Maya Language as Spoken in Hocobá, Yucatán. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Brown, Linda Kay. 1979. Word formation in Pocomchi (Mayan). PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.

Buenrostro, Cristina. 1996. Algunos aspectos semánticos de la posesión en Chuj. In

Josefina García Fajardo (ed.) Análisis Semánticos. 37-51. Mexico City: Colegio de México.

Coon, Jessica. 2019. Building verbs in Chuj: Consequences for the nature of roots. Journal of Linguistics 55: 35-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226718000087

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at Large. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Dayley, Jon P. 1985. Tzutujil Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–392.

https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634

Embick, David. 2023. Smaller syntax for English stative passives: A first report. Acta

Linguistica Academica 70: 285-316

https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00644

Español Echevarría, Manuel. 1997. Inalienable possession in copulative contexts and the DP structure. Lingua 101: 211–244.

Guéron, Jaqueline. 1985. Inalienable possession, PRO-inclusion, and lexical chains. In J. Guéron, H. Obenauer & J-Y. Pollock (eds.) Grammatical representation, 43-86. Dordrecht: Foris.

Guéron, Jaqueline. 2003. Inalienable possession and the interpretation of determiners. In M.Coene & Y. D’Hulst (eds.), From NP to DP (Volume 2). The Expression of Possession in Noun Phrases, 189–220 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.56.13gue

Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40: 225-276. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0010

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karvovskaya, Lena. 2018. The typology and formal semantics of adnominal possession. PhD Dissertation, University of Utrecht.

Kempchinsky, Paula. 1992. The Spanish possessive dative construction: θ-role assignment and proper government. In P. Hirschbühler & E. F. K. Koerner (eds.) Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory, 135–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.91.10kem

Kramer, Ruth. 2015. The morphosyntax of gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679935.001.0001

Landau, Idan. 1999. Possessor raising and the structure of VP. Lingua 107: 1-37.

Larsen, Thomas. 1988. Manifestations of ergativity in Quiché grammar. PhD Dissertation, UC Berkeley.

Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Possession in Yucatec Maya. Erfurt: Universität.

Levinson, Lisa. 2014. The ontology of roots and verbs. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer and F. Schäfer (eds.) The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, 208-229. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0010

Löbner, Sebastian. 2011. Concept Types and Determination. Journal of Semantics 28: 279-333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq022

Marqueta, Bárbara. 2019. The syntactic structure of pelirrojo compounds. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4(1): 40. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.746

Mora-Marín, David. 2021a. Reconstructing possession morphology in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 87: 369-422. https://doi.org/10.1086/714250

Mora-Marín, David, 2021b. Reconstructing possession morphology in Mayan languages: data appendices 1-3. International Journal of American Linguistics 87. https://doi.org/10.1086/714250.

Myler, Neil. 2016. Building and interpreting possession sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034913.001.0001

Myler, Neil. 2018. Attributive Possession and the Contributions of Roots. Paper given at DGfS 40 @ Universität Stuttgart. March 2018.

Myler, Neil. In Preparation. Attributive Possession, the Contributions of Roots, and Parameters of Poss and n. Paper in preparation for the edited volume Possession and the part-whole relationship in language, ed by Lieven Danckaert, Vassil Mostrov, and Fayssal Tayalati. Volume accepted for publication with Oxford University Press.

Nakamoto, Takeshi. 2010. Inalienable possession constructions in French. Lingua 120: 74-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.003

Nichols, Johanna. 1988. On alienable and inalienable possesion. In W. Shipley (ed.). In Honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics, 557-609. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Nichols, Johana. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel. 2013. Possessive Classification. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) WALS Online (v2020.3) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533

Panagioditis, Phoevos & Vítor Nóbrega. 2022. Why we need roots in Minimalism. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/006497 (to appear in the Cambridge Handbook of Minimalism)

Picallo, Carme & Gemma Rigau. 1999. El posesivo y las relaciones posesivas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 973-1023. Madrid: Espasa.

Polian, Gilles. 2013. Gramática del tseltal de Oxchuc. Mexico City: CIESAS.

Rodrigues, Cilene. 2010. Possessor raising through thematic positions. In N. Hornstein & M. Polinsky (eds.) Movement theory of control, 119–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.154.05rod

Ross Montejo, Antonio Benicio & Edna Patricia Delgado Rojas. 2000. Slahb’ab’anil Kotzotelb’al yu Popti’. Variación dialectal en popti’. Guatemala: OKMA/Cholsamaj.

Seiler, Hansjakob. 1983. Possession as an operational dimension of language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.

Stassen, Leon. 2009. Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199211654.001.0001

Ticio, Emma. 2005. Locality and antilocality in Spanish DPs. Syntax 8: 229-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00080.x

Ultan, Russell. 1978. Toward a typology of substantival possession. In J. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language Vol 4: Syntax, 11–50. Stanford University Press.

Val Álvaro, José Francisco. 1999. La composición. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 4757-4842. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.

Vergnaud, Jean-Roger & María Luisa Zubizarreta. 1992. The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 595-652.

Wood, Jim. 2023. Icelandic nominalizations and allosemy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Armstrong, G. (2024). The roots and structures of possessive noun classes. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, 10(6), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.461

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.