On the emergence of argument encoding in causative constructions in Romance

Authors

Abstract

Causative constructions in Romance show complex variation regarding the case of the subject of the non-finite clause (causee) and to its position with respect to the main causative verb and the embedded non-finite verb. It has been argued that the variation reflects the diachronic evolution of the causative construction in Romance and also documents an ongoing process of further development. We present original empirical data from a comparative corpus of Bible translations that provide new insights into diachronic evolution as well as to the synchronic variation. Our comparative approach allows us to generalize over additional semantic and pragmatic parameters for the choice of a particular construction. Our data support the assumption of the extension of ECM from clitic to nominal causee constructions in French, but they do not support this for Italian. For Spanish we see some ECM constructions in the most recent translation only.

Keywords

Romance, causative construction, diachronic evolution, Exceptional Case Marking (ECM), FAIRE-infinitive

References

Abeillé, Anne, Godard, Danièle, & Philip H. Miller. 1997. Les causatives en français, un cas de compétition syntaxique. Langue française 115: 62–74.

https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1997.6222

Ackerman, Farrell, & John Moore. 1999. Syntagmatic and paradigmatic dimensions of causee encodings. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 1–44.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005462027684

Alfonso Vega, Milagros. 2006. Verbos causativos. In C.C. Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal. Volumen II, 969–1052. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México / Fondo de cultura económica.

Authier, Marc, & Lisa A. Reed. 1991. Ergative predicates and dative cliticization in French causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 197–205.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178714

Belletti, Adriana. 2017. Labeling (Romance) causatives. In E.O. Aboh, E. Haeberli, G. Puskás, & M. Schönenberger (eds), Elements of Comparative Syntax. Theory and Description, 13–46. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504037-002

Bordelois, Ivonne A. 1974. The Grammar of Spanish Causative Complements. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Bordelois, Ivonne. 1988. Causatives: from lexicon to syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 57–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01791592

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Chamberlain, Jeffrey T. 1986. Latin Antecedents of French Causative Faire. New York: Lang.

Ciutescu, Elena. 2013a. Micro-parametric variation in Romance causative constructions. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 45–60.

http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/vol-xv-nr-2/

Ciutescu, Elena. 2013b. Remarks on the infinitival subject of perception verb complements: evidence from two syntactic configurations. Revue roumaine de linguistique 58(3): 299–312.

Ciutescu, Elena. 2015. Romance causatives and object shift. In E.O. Aboh, J.C. Schaeffer &, P. Sleeman (eds), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013. Selected Papers from "Going Romance" Amsterdam 2013, 21–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.02ciu

Davies, Mark Edward. 1992. The diachronic evolution of causative constructions in Spanish and Portuguese. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.

Davies, Mark. 1995a. The evolution of causative constructions in Spanish and Portuguese. In J. Amastae, G. Goodall, M. Montalbetti, & M. Phinney (eds), Contemporary Research in Romance Linguistics: Papers from the 22nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, El Paso/Cd. Juarez. February 1992, 105–122. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.123.10dav

Davies, Mark E. 1995b. The evolution of the Spanish causative construction. Hispanic Review 63: 57–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/474378

Enrique-Arias, Andrés. 2013. On the usefulness of using parallel texts in diachronic investigations. Insights from a parallel corpus of Spanish medieval Bible translations. In P. Bennett, M. Durrell, S. Scheible, & R.J. Whitt (eds), New Methods in Historical Corpora, 105–115. Tübingen: Narr.

Enzinger, Stefan. 2010. Kausative und perzeptive Infinitivkonstruktionen. Syntaktische Variation und semantischer Aspekt. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050062310

Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 1999. Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Vol. 1: Sintaxis de la clases de palabras, 1317–1397. Madrid: Espasa.

Folli, Raffaella, & Heidi Harley. 2007. Causation, obligation, and argument structure: on the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.

https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.2.197

Franco, Jon, & Alazne Landa. 1995. An analysis of AGRo projections for Spanish causatives. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca ‘Julio de Urquijo’ 29: 199–218.

Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1993. Causative and perception verbs: a comparative study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.

Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2006. Analytic causatives. In M. Everaert, & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Volume I, 142–172. Malden: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch6

Herslund, Michael. 1980. Problèmes de l’ancien français. Compléments datifs et génitifs. Copenhagen: Romansk Institut.

Hyman, Larry M., & Karl Zimmer. 1976. Embedded topics in French. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 191–211. New York: Academic Press.

Jones, Michael Allan. 1996. Foundations of French Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620591

Kaiser, Georg A. 2015. Zur Verwendung von Bibelübersetzungen in der (romanistischen) Sprachwissenschaft. Biblicum Jassyense 6: 5–18.

Kaiser, Georg A. 2023. Konstanz parallel text corpus. Bible translations. To appear in G.A. Kaiser, A. Weingart, N. Cordes & S. Krieger, KonCAT. Konstanz Corpus Annotation Tool. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Linguistik.

Kayne, Richard. 1975. French Syntax. The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Kulikov, Leonid. 2001. Causatives. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, vol. 2, 886–898. Berlin: de Gruyter.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110194265-003

Labelle, Marie. 2017. Causative and perception verbs. In A. Dufter, & E. Stark (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, 299–231. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-008

Lehmann, Christian. 2016. Latin causativization in typological perspective. In P. Poccetti (ed.), Latinitatis Rationes. Descriptive and Historical Accounts for the Latin Language, 917–941. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431896-057

Lerch, Eugen. 1937. Review of Horst Kunze, Die Bibelübersetzungen von Lefèvre d'Étaples und von P.R. Olivetan, verglichen mit ihrem Wortschatz. Leipziger Roman. Studien, hrsg. von W. v. Wartburg, Reihe I, Heft 11. Leipzig 1935. Selbstverlag des Roman. Seminars; Paris, E. Droz. 236 S. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 57: 610–616.

Martin, Fabienne, & Florian Schäfer. 2014. Causation at the syntax-semantics interface. In B. Copley, & F. Martin (eds), Causation in Grammatical Structures, 209–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672073.003.0009

Martineau, France. 1990. La construction «accusatif avec infinitif» avec les verbes causatifs et de perception en moyen français. Revue québécoise de linguistique 19: 77–100. https://doi.org/10.7202/602666ar

Martineau, France. 1992. The evolution of complements of French causative and perception verbs. In P. Hirschbühler, & K. Koerner (eds), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory. Papers from the 20th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XX), Ottawa, 10-14 April 1990, 161–174. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.91.12mar

Martins, Ana Maria. 2018. Infinitival complements of causative/perception verbs in a diachronic perspective. In A.L. Santos, & A. Gonçalves (eds), Complement Clauses in Portuguese. Syntax and Acquisition, 101–128. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.04mar

Mensching, Guido. 2017. Infinitival clauses. In A. Dufter, & E. Stark (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, 369–396. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-010

Pearce, Elizabeth. 1990. Parameters in Old French Syntax. Infinitival Complements. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Pineda, Anna. 2020. From dative to accusative. An ongoing syntactic change in Romance. Probus 32: 129–173. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2019-0001

Pineda, Anna, & Michelle Sheehan. 2023. A Cyclic Agree account of the Romance faire-infinitive: New evidence from Catalan. Syntax 26 (2): 183–222.

https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12247

Reed, Lisa. 1991. The thematic and syntactic structure of French causatives. Probus 3: 317–360. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1991.3.3.317

Rinke, Esther. 2023. The emergence of the Portuguese inflected infinitive as a complement of causative verbs: structural enrichment or independent development? In N. Pomino, E.-M. Remberger, & J. Zwink (eds), From Formal Linguistic Theory to the Art of Historical Editions. The Multifaceted Dimensions of Romance Linguistics, 147–166. Wien: V&R unipress | Brill.

Rouveret, Alain, & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1980. Specifying reference to the subject: French causative constructions and conditions on representations. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1): 97–202. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178152

Sheehan, Michelle 2020. The development of exceptional case marking in Romance with a particular focus on French. Probus 32: 367–400.

https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2020-0002

Sheehan, Michelle, & Sonia Cyrino. 2016. Variation and change in the Romance faire-par causative. In E. Carrilho, A. Fiéis, M. Lobo, & S. Pereira (eds), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10. Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28, Lisbon, 279–303. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.14she

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In M. Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. Leiden: Brill.

Shibatani, Masayoshi, & Prashant Pardeshi. 2001. The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (eds), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 85–126. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.07shi

Smith, John Charles. 2002. Middle French: When? What? Why? Language Sciences 24: 423–445.

Strozer, Judith. 1976. Clitics in Spanish. Ph.D. thesis, Ann Arbor University Microfilms.

Torrego, Esther. 1999. El complemento directo preposicional. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Vol. 2: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Relaciones temporales, aspectuales y modales, 1779–1805. Madrid: Espasa.

Torrego, Esther. 2010. Variability in the case patterns of causative formation in Romance and its implications. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3): 445–470.

https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00004

Torrego, Esther. 2011. Oraciones causativas. In M.V. Escandell Vidal, M. Leonetti, & C.S. López (eds), 60 problemas de gramática dedicados a Ignacio Bosque, 147–151. Madrid: Akal.

Treviño, Esthela. 1992. Subjects in Spanish causative constructions. In P. Hirschbühler, & K. Koerner (eds), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory. Papers from the 20th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XX), Ottawa, 10–14 April 1990, 309–324. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.91

Treviño, Esthela. 1994. Las causativas del español con complemento infinitivo. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México.

Tubino Blanco, Mercedes. 2011. Causatives in Minimalism. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.179

Vincent, Nigel. 2016. Causatives in Latin and Romance. In J. Adams, & N. Vincent (eds), Early and Late Latin. Continuity or Change?, 294–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316450826.014

de Vries, Lourens. 2007. Some remarks on the use of Bible translations as parallel texts in linguistic research. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60: 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2007.60.2.148

Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1985. The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax: the case of Romance causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 16(2): 247–289. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178431

Published

01-03-2024

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.