Adverbial causal clauses as relative clauses

On siccome 'because/since' from Old to Contemporary Italian

Authors

  • Emanuela Sanfelici University of Padua
  • Sira Rodeghiero University of Padua

Abstract

This paper investigates to what extent adverbial causal clauses and relative clauses can be reduced as one and the same phenomenon. Whereas causal clauses have always posed a challenge for a unified account of relativization and adverbial subordination in theoretical studies, typological research has long demonstrated that causal clauses are diachronically connected to relative clauses as well as to adverbial subordinates that have been theoretically analysed as relative clauses. We argue that at least some causal clauses are underlyingly relative clauses over situations (see Arsenijević 2021). Our claim is supported by the diachronic development of the Italian subordinator siccome ‘because/since’, an univerbated form morphologically composed of two items, the comparative-similative wh-pronoun come ‘how’ and the demonstrative adverbial pronoun ‘so’. We demonstrate that the causal subordinator is derived from the comparative-similative one via a three-stage diachronic change which is formally captured in terms of type of movement and null elements (Kayne 2005, Cinque 2020b). In so doing, our paper extends a relative clause analysis to causal clauses and adds a novel path to the diachronic development of causal clauses.

Keywords

relative clauses, causal clauses, comparative clauses, Italian, diachrony

References

Aboh, Enoch. 2005. Deriving relative and factive constructions in Kwa. In Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds.), Contributions to the thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 265–285. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.248508

Arsenijević, Boban. 2009. Clausal complementation as relativization. Lingua 119: 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.003

Arsenijević, Boban. 2021. Situation relatives: Deriving causation, concession, counterfactuality, condition, and purpose. In Andreas Blümel, Jovana Gajić, Ljudmila Geist, Uwe Junghanns & Hagen Pitsch (eds.), Advances in formal Slavic linguistics 2018, 1–34. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.5281/ zenodo.5483092

Baños, José Miguel. 2011. Causal clauses. In Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Philip Baldi (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax: Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, vol. 4, 195–234. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter

Benincà, Paola. 2010. Headless relatives in some Old Italian varieties. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), Syntactic variation. The dialects of Italy, 55-70. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Conditionals. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second edition, vol 1, 638–687. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733

Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372

Bresnan, Joan, and Jane Grimshaw. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 331-391.

Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Caponigro, Ivano. 2003. Free not to ask: On the semantics of Free Relatives and wh-words cross-linguistically. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.

Caponigro, Ivano. 2004. The semantic contribution of Wh-words and type shifts: Evidence from free relatives crosslinguistically. In Robert B. Young (ed.), Proceedings from Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIV, 38–55. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2906

Caponigro, Ivano & Maria Polinsky. 2008. Relatively speaking (in Circassian). In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), WCCFL 27: Proceedings of 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 81–89. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/27/paper1819.pdf.

Caponigro, Ivano & Maria Polinsky. 2011. Relative embeddings: A Circassian puzzle for the syntax/semantics interface. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(1): 71-122.

Caponigro, Ivano, Torrence, Harold & Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds). 2021. Headless Relative Clauses in Mesoamerican languages. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati. 2012. “Perché” Rizzi is right. In Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds.), ENJOY LINGUISTICS! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 54–62. Siena: CISCL Press. http://www.ciscl.unisi.it/gg60/papers/cecchetto_donati.pdf

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2013. Typological Studies. Word Order and Relative Clause. New York/London: Routledge.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2020a. On the double-headed analysis of “Headless” relative clauses. In Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation, 169–196. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505201-011

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2020b. The Syntax of Relative Clauses. A Unified Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856195

Cristofaro, Sonia. 1998. Grammaticalization and clause linkage strategies: a typological approach with particular reference to Ancient Greek. In Anna Giacalone-Ramat & Paul Hopper (eds.), The Limits of Grammaticalization, 59–88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.37.03cri

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

D’Achille, Paolo & Maria Grossmann. 2017. Per la storia della formazione delle parole in italiano: un nuovo corpus in rete (MIDIA) e nuove prospettive di studio. Firenze: Franco Cesati.

Dardano, Maurizio. 2020. Sintassi dell'italiano antico. La prosa del Duecento e del Trecento. Roma: Carocci.

Demirdache, Hamida & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. In Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme. The Syntax of time, 143-179. Cambridge/London: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6598.003.0008

Donati, Caterina. 1997. Comparative clauses as free relatives: a raising analysis. Probus 9. 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1997.9.2.145

Ernout, Alfred & Francois Thomas. 1953. Syntaxe Latine. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.

Frenguelli, Gianluca. 2002. L’espressione della causalità in italiano antico. Roma: Aracne.

Geis, Michael Lorenz. 1970. Adverbial subordinate clauses in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Gelderen van, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.71

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.

Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014

Haegeman, Liliane. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120: 628–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.007

Hall, David & Ivano Caponigro. 2010. On the semantics of temporal when-clauses. Proceedings of SALT 20, 544–563.

Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704

Hetterle, Katja. 2015. Adverbial clauses in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110409857

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525

Hualde, José Ignacio & Manuel Pérez Saldanya. 2019. Grammaticalization Processes in Causal Subordination. In Ane Berro, Fernández Beatriz & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), Basque and Romance, 317-345. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004395398_011

Hulsey, Sarah & Uli Sauerland. 2006. Sorting out relative clauses. Natural Language Semantics 14: 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-3799-3

Hutchison, John Priestley. 1976. Aspects of Kanuri Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.

Kayne, Richard. 1991. Romance Clitics, Verb Movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–686.

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and Silence. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001

Kayne, Richard. 2010. Why isn’t This a complementizer?. In Richard Kayne (ed.), Comparison and contrasts, 190-227. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kratzer, Angelika. 2010. Situations in natural language semantics. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (fall 2010 edition). Stanford, CA: CSLI. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/situations-semantics/.

Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812428

Jędrzejowski Łukasz. Accepted. On the synchrony and diachrony of causal jako-że-clauses in Polish. Linguistics Vanguard.

Larson, Richard. 1985. Bare-NP adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16.4. 595–621.

Larson, Richard. 1987. Missing prepositions and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 239-266.

Larson, Richard. 1990. Extraction and multiple selection in PP. The Linguistic Review 7. 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1990.7.2.169

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2008. Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In Henrik Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination: From morphology to discourse management, 189-211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99

Mantenuto, Iara & Ivano Caponigro. 2021. Free relative clauses in Teramano. Quaderni di lavoro ASIt/ASIt Working Papers, 23:31-62.

Moline, Estelle. 2006. Et comme minuit allait sonner, … Pour en finir avec la partition temporelles vs causales. In Estelle Moline, Dejan Stosic & Carl Vetters (eds.), Les connecteurs temporels du français (Cahiers Chronos 15), 63–90. Amsterdam/New York: Brill.

Poletto, Cecilia & Emanuela Sanfelici. 2018. On relative complementizers and relative pronouns. Linguistic Variation 18(2). 265-298. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16002.pol

Poletto, Cecilia and Emanuela Sanfelici. 2021. Against complementizers. In Sam Wolfe & Christine Meklenborg (eds.), Continuity and Variation in Germanic and Romance, 370-403. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0015

Renzi, Lorenzo. 2004. II progetto «Italant» e la grammatica del corpus. Verbum. Analecta Neolatina 4: 271–294.

Rizzi, Luigi.1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Rizzi, Luigi (2001) On the position ‘‘int(errogative)’’ in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 267–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 223-251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rizzi, Luigi. 2015. Cartography, criteria and labeling. In Ur Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond functional sequence, 314–338. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci. 2017. The left periphery of the clause: primarily illustrated for Italian. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, 1-30. Oxford: Blackwell.

Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rossini Favretti, Remo. 2000. Progettazione e costruzione di un corpus di italiano scritto: CORIS/CODIS. In R. Rossini Favretti (ed.), Linguistica e informatica. Multimedialità, corpora e percorsi di apprendimento, 39-56. Roma: Bulzoni.

Salvi, Giampaolo & Lorenzo Renzi. 2010. Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Sanfelici, Emanuela. 2023. On the strenght of D0: case resolution phenomena in free relative clauses. Linguistische Berichte 274: 157-213.

Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten. 2009. A typology of purpose clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.88

Schuh, Russell G. 1972. Aspects of Ngizim syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles

Shlonsky, Ur & Gabriela Soare. 2011. Where’s ‘Why’? Linguistic Inquiry 42, 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064

Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver & Craige Roberts. 2010. What projects and why. In Nan Li & David Lutz (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, 309–327. Ithaca, NY: CLC. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2584

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. In Istvan Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian, 167-190, (Vol.2). Jate: Szeged.

Thompson, Sandra, Robert E. Longacre & Shin Ja J. Hwang. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume II: Complex Constructions, 237–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486500

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2004. Historical pragmatics. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 538-561. Oxford: Blackwell.

Treis, Yvonne. 2017. Similative morphemes as purpose clause markers in Ethiopia and beyond. In Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 91–142. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117.05tre

Valmala, Vidal. 2009. On the position of central adverbial clauses. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 43: 951-970.

Published

14-03-2024

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.