Superlative Minimizers as Weak Definites

A study on Spanish

Authors

  • Ulises Delgado Díaz Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Abstract

This paper deals with a hitherto little studied type of superlative, so-called ‘superlative minimizers’, which in Spanish take the form el más mínimo N ‘the slightest N’. Several tests show that these superlatives are non-specific or non-referential, despite their necessarily definite shape. The semantic properties of these expressions cannot be accounted for using the usual tools in theories on definiteness or quantity superlatives. The aim of this work is to provide a compositional analysis that explains several properties of these superlatives, particularly their non-specific nature and restrictions on the type of noun they admit. Assuming a kind-based semantics for nouns and a state-based theory on gradability, I propose that superlative minimizers express uniqueness over state-kinds, thus giving rise to a non-specific meaning of the DP and a quantity meaning, since state-kinds are scalar-ordered in the extensional domain of nouns. As a consequence, this work straddles two lines of research: on the one hand, it broadens our knowledge on quantity superlatives (cf. Hackl 2009, Solt 2012, a.o.) with a new type subject to previously unstudied characteristics; on the other, SMs are a type of the much-studied weak definites (cf. Aguilar-Guevara & Zwarts 2010, Abbott 2014, a.o.).

Keywords

superlatives, superlative minimizers, quantity-superlatives, definiteness, weak definites

References

Abbott, Barbara. 2014. The indefiniteness of definiteness. In T. Gamerschlag, D. Gerland, R. Osswald & W. Petersen (eds), Frames and Concept Types. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 94, 323–341. Springer, Cham.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01541-5_14

Aguilar-Guevera, Ana, & Joost Zwarts. 2011. Weak definites and reference to kinds. In N. Li & D. Lutz (eds), Proceedings of SALT 20, 179–196. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2583

Aguilar-Guevera, Ana, & Joost Zwarts. 2013. Weak definites refer to kinds. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 42: 33–60. https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2169

Anderson, Curt, & Marcin Morzycki. 2015. Degrees as kinds. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(3): 791–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9290-z

Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In M. Bierwisch & E. Lang (eds), Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation, 71–261. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Bogal-Albritten, Elizabeth. 2012. Slightly coerced: Processing evidence for adjectival coercion by minimizers. In Proceedings of the 48th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 77–92. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.

Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786

Cariani, Fabrizio, Santorio, Paolo, & Alexis Wellwood. 2019. Confidence reports. Ms.

Carlson, Greg. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts.

Carlson, Greg, & Rachel S. Sussman. 2005. Seemingly indefinite definites. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds), Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives, 71–86. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.71

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in Grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001

Delgado, Ulises. 2020. Scalar properties of negative polarity superlatives. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 9(1): 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/1.9.1.5358

Delgado, Ulises. 2023. Los minimizadores superlativos en español: Fenómenos de grado, definitud y polaridad. Ph.D. thesis. Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid.

Espinal, M. Teresa, & Sonia Cyrino. 2020. On the syntax of number in Romance. Studia Linguistica: A journal of general linguistics 74(1): 165–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12123

Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2010. Making a definite be interpreted as an indefinite. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 9(1): 29–51. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.109

Fábregas, Antonio. 2018. Determiners and quantifiers in Spanish: Types, tests and theories. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 7(2): 1–107. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.7.2.4546

Fábregas, Antonio. 2019. Lexical and syntactic aspects of D-like and Q-like adjectives in Spanish. In N. Pomino (ed.), Proceedings of the IX Nereus International Workshop ‘Morphosyntactic and semantic aspects of the DP in Romance and beyond’, 41–68. Konstanz: Fachbereich Linguistik.

Farkas, Donka, & Katalin É. Kiss. 2000. On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 417–455. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006431429816

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logic structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6(3): 353–375.

Francez, Itamar, & Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2015. Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts. Language 91(3): 533–563. doi:10.1353/lan.2015.0047

Francez, Itamar, & Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2017. Semantics and Morphosyntactic Variation: Qualities and the grammar of property concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2006. Superlatives quantifiers and the dynamics of context dependence. In K. von Heusinger & K. Turner (eds), Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, 237–266. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2010. Characterizing superlative quantifiers. In P. Cabredo Hofherr & O. Matushansky (eds), Adjectives: Formal Analyses in Syntax and Semantics, 187–231. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.153.06gut

Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2014. Interfaces and Domains of Quantification. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Moreno-Quibén, Norberto, & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2020. On degree minimizers in Spanish. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 9(1): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.9.1.5367

Hackl, Martin. 2009. On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: ‘most’ versus ‘more than half’. Natural Language Semantics 17: 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9039-x

Hawkins, John A. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.

Heim, Irene. 1999. Notes on superlatives. Ms., MIT. Available at http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~astechow/Lehre/SS08/Superlative.pdf

Kayne, Richard S. 2007. On the syntax of quantity in English. In J. Bayer, T. Bhattacharya & M. T. Hany Bab (eds), Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages: Essays in Honour of K. A. Jayaseelan, 73–105. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.102.09kay

Kennedy, Chris. 2007. Vagueness and Grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics & Philosophy 30: 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0

Leonetti, Manuel. 1999. Los determinantes. Madrid: Arco Libros.

Leonetti, Manuel. 2019. On weak readings of definite DPs. In N. Pomino (ed.), Proceedings of the VII Nereus International Workshop “Clitic Doubling and other Issues of the Syntax/Semantic Interface in Romance DPs, 1–26. Konstanz: Fachbereich Linguistik.

Loccioni, Nicoletta. 2019. The Romance of modal superlatives as degree descriptions. In K. Blake, F. Davis, K. Lamp, & J. Rhyne (eds), Proceedings of SALT 29, 219–237. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v29i0.4609

Lumsden, Michael. 1988. Existential Sentences: Their structure and meaning. London: Croom Helm.

McNally, Louis. 2011. The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the behavior of gradable adjectives. In R. Nouwen, R. van Rooij, U. Sauerland & H. C. Schmitz (eds), Vagueness in Communication, 151–168. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_9

Milsark, Gary L. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Milsark, Gary L. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3(1): 1–29.

Moltmann, Friederike. 2004. Properties and Kinds of Tropes: New linguistic facts and old philosophical insights. Mind 113: 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/113.449.1

Moltmann, F. 2009. Degree Structure as Trope Structure: A trope-based analysis of quality and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 51–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9054-5

Rando, Emily, & Donna Jo Napoli. 1978. Definites in There-Sentences. Language 54(2): 300–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/412949

Romero, Maribel. 2013. Modal Superlatives: A compositional analysis. Natural Language Semantics 21: 79–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9090-5

Ross, John R. 1964. A Partial Grammar of English Superlatives. MA thesis. University of Pennsylvania.

Sáez, Luis. 1999. Los cuantificadores: Las construcciones comparativas y superlativas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 1, 1129–1188. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Sáez, Luis. 2016. Comparativos y superlativos. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, 437–447. London: Routledge.

Sánchez Masià, Melania. 2017. Adverbial adjectives and nominal scalarity. Ph.D. thesis, Autonomous University of Barcelona.

Sassoon, Galit W. 2012. A slightly modified economy principle: Stable properties have non-stable standards. In E. Cohen (ed.), Proceedings of IATL 2011, 163–182. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

Solt, Stéphanie. 2009. The Semantics of Adjectives of Quantity. Ph.D. thesis. The City University of New York.

Solt, Stéphanie. 2012. Comparison to Arbitrary Standards. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16(2): 557–570.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 2012. Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most. In A. Chereches (ed.), Proceedings of SALT 22: 1–25.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative superlatives. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 245–266.

Toledo, Assif, & Galit W. Sassoon. 2012. Absolute vs. relative adjectives: Variance within vs. between individuals. In N. Ashton, A. Chereches, & D. Lutz (eds), Proceedings of SALT 21, 135–164.

Tovena, Lucia. 2001. Between mass and count. In K. Megerdoomian & L. A. Bar-el (eds), WCCFL 20, 565–578. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Tovena, Lucia. 2003. Distributional restrictions on negative determiners. In K. M. Jaszczolt & K. Turner (eds.), Meaning Through Language Contrast, vol. 1, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.99.04tov

Tovena, Lucia, & Jacques Jayez. 1999. Any: From scalarity to arbitrariness. In F. Corblin et al. (eds), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics II, 39–57. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphic.

Tubau, Susagna. 2016. On the syntax of English minimizers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(2): 739–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9308-6

Tubau, Susagna. 2020. Maximizers and minimizers as different types of polarity items. In M. T. Espinal & V. Déprez (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Negation, 407–425. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.24

Vallduví, Eric. 1994. Polarity items, N-words and minimizers in Catalan and Spanish. Probus 6: 263–294. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1994.6.2-3.263

Westerståhl, Dag. 1984. Determiners and context sets. In A. ter Meulen & J. van Benthem (eds), Generalized quantifiers in natural language, 45–72. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867909.45

Wilson, E. Cameron. 2018. Amount superlatives and Measure Phrases. Ph.D. thesis. The City University of New York.

Wilson, E. Cameron. 2021. The most, the fewest and the least: On the relative readings of quantity superlatives. Semantics and Pragmatics 14(9): 1–51. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.14.9

Zato, Zoltan. 2020a. Encoding states is not enough: The case of Spanish deadjectival nominalizations. Studia Linguistica: A Journal of General Linguistics 74(3): 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12139

Zato, Zoltan. 2020b. The role of state-kinds in the morphosemantics of Spanish deadjectival nominalizations. Ph.D. thesis. País Vasco University.

Published

2024-07-27

Downloads