Too weak to be pronounced: pro-drop and PF-LF mismatches in pronouns

Irene Amato

doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.323

Too weak to be pronounced

pro-drop and PF-LF mismatches in pronouns

Authors

Irene Amato

PDF

Abstract

In Gradient Harmonic Grammar (Smolensky & Goldrick 2016), syntactic strength is considered an inherent property of linguistic items. In this paper, I propose that syntactic strength plays a crucial role in pro-drop and in other phenomena that have often been related to a vague concept of “strength”. I suggest that pro-drop results from failed lexicalization of weak pronouns in the presence of a strong T. Subject clitics of non-pro-drop languages instead stem from the strengthening of weak pronouns in the context of a weak T. This strength-based approach to pronouns can be also extended to the independent phenomenon of mismatches between strong forms and weak semantics of pronouns, which is problematic for standard accounts à la Cardinaletti & Starke 1999 and it is not accounted for by any other theory of pro-drop. In general, such an approach is a mere extension of what has been tacitly presupposed while talking about strength for pro-drop (Rizzi 1986a; Alexiadou & Anagnostopoulou 1998), and for other phenomena (see Cardinaletti & Starke 1999 for pronouns; Chomsky 2013, 2015; Cecchetto & Donati 2022 for labeling).

Keywords

syntactic strength, pro-drop, subject clitics, PF-LF mismatches, Gradient Harmonic Grammar

References

Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. New York: Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199219261.001.0001.

Alexiadou, Artemis, & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090432389

Alexiadou, Artemis, & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2021. Rethinking the nature of nominative case. In J. Douglas, A. Bárány, T. Biberauer, & S. Vikner (eds), Syntactic structure and its consequences III, 69–93. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://zenodo.org/records/4680301

Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null arguments. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Barbosa, Pilar. 2011. Pro-drop and theories of pro in the minimalist program part 1: Consistent null subject languages and the pronominal-Agr hypothesis. Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00293.x

Benincà, Paola. 1994. La variazione sintattica. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Blutner, Reinhard. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of semantics 17(3): 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/17.3.189

Borer, Hagit. 1986. I-subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 375–416.

Brandi, Luciana, & Patrizia Cordin. 1989. Two Italian dialects and the Null Subject Parameter. In O. A. Jaeggli, & K. J. Safir (eds), The Null Subject Parameter, 111–142. Dordrecht: Springer.

Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 55–95. London and New York: Longman.

Cardinaletti, Anna. 2002. Against optional and null clitics. right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia linguistica 56: 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00086

Cardinaletti, Anna, & Lori Repetti. 2008. The phonology and syntax of preverbal and postverbal subject clitics in Northern Italian dialects. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 523–563. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.4.523

Cardinaletti, Anna, & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study in the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.145

Cecchetto, Carlo, & Caterina Donati. 2022. Labeling (reduced) structures: When VPs are sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 55(1): 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00460

Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 417–454. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003

Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (eds), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 223: 1–16. https://doi.org/10. 1075/la.223.01cho

Déchaine, Rose-Marie, & Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902760168554

Despić, Miloje. 2011. Syntax in the absence of determiner phrase. Ph.D. thesis, UConn.

Duguine, Maia. 2013. Null arguments and linguistic variation: a minimalist analysis of pro-drop. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Nantes.

Duguine, Maia. 2014. Argument ellipsis: a unitary approach to pro-drop. The Linguistic Review 31: 515–549. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0010

D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2015. Null subjects. In J. Mateu, A. Fábregas, & M. T. Putnam (eds), Contemporary linguistic parameters, 201–226. London: Bloomsbury Press.

Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11049-007-9025-x

Gilligan, Gary. 1987. A cross-linguistic approach to the pro-drop parameter. Ph.D. thesis, Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

Goldrick, Matthew, Putnam, Michael T., & Lara Schwarz. 2016. Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19: 857–876. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000802

Goldwater, Sharon, & Mark Johnson. 2003. Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model. In J. Spenader, A. Eriksson, & Ö. Dahl (eds), Proceedings of the Stockholm workshop on variation within Optimality Theory, 111–120. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1997. Projection, heads, and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–422. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178985

Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages. In M.-A. Friedemann, & L. Rizzi (eds), The acquisition of syntax, 129–169. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839899-6

Halle, Morris, & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale, & S. J. Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Harley, Heidi, & Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot international 4: 3–9.

Hayes, Bruce. 2009. MaxEnt Grammar Tool [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/MaxentGrammarTool.

Heck, Fabian, & Gereon Müller. 2013. Extremely local optimization. In H. Broekhuis, & R. Vogel (eds), Linguistic derivations and filtering, 135–166. Sheffield: Equinox.

Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–564. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464322

Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Null subject parameters. In I. Roberts, T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, & M. Sheehan (eds), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770784.003

Hsu, Brian. 2021. Harmonic grammar in phrasal movement: an account of probe competition and blocking. In A. Farinella, & A. Hill, NELS 51: Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 237–250. University of Massachusetts Amherst: GLSA.

Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195102352.001.0001

Lee, Hyunjung. 2018. Generalized complementizer-trace effects in Gradient Harmonic Grammar: Deriving extraction asymmetries. Talk given at DGfS 40, Universität Stuttgart.

Lee, Hyunjung, & Gereon Müller. 2018. Asymmetries in long-distance dependencies: A view from Gradient Harmonic Grammar. Talk given at Workshop on Long-Distance Dependencies, HU Berlin.

Legendre, Géraldine, & Paul Smolensky. 2017. A competition-based analysis of French anticausatives. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 40: 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/ li.40.1.02leg

Manzini, Maria Rita, & Leonardo Maria Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani: sintassi delle varietà italiane e romance. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.

Montalbetti, Mario M. 1984. After binding: On the interpretation of pronouns. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Müller, Gereon. 2006. Pro-drop and impoverishment. In P. Brandt, & E. Fuss, Form, Structure, and Grammar. A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on occasion of his 60th Birthday, 93–115. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050085555.93

Müller, Gereon. 2017. Gradient symbolic representations in syntax. Universität Leipzig.

Müller, Gereon. 2019. The third construction and strength of C: A Gradient Harmonic Grammar approach. In J. Wood, K. Ramshøj Christensen, & H. Jørgensen (eds), The sign of the V - Papers in honour of Sten Vikner, 419–448. Aarhus: Aarhus University. https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.348.107

Müller, Gereon. 2022. Strength in Germanic syntax. Talk given at CGSW 36, The University of Chicago.

Müller, Gereon, Englisch, Johannes, & Andreas Opitz. 2022. Extraction from NP, frequency, and minimalist Gradient Harmonic Grammar. Linguistics 60(5): 1619–1662. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0049

Neeleman, Ad, & Kriszta Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro-drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671–714. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671

Pesetsky, David. 1997. Syntax and optimality. In D. Archangeli, & T. Langendoen (eds), Optimality theory. London: Blackwell.

Poletto, Cecilia. 1996. Three kinds of subject clitics. In A. Belletti, & L. Rizzi (eds), Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax, 269–300. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/ 9780195087932.003.0009

Poletto, Cecilia. 1997. Pronominal syntax. In M. Maiden, & M. Parry (eds), The dialects of Italy, 137–144. London and New York: Routledge.

Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The higher functional field: Evidence from Northern Italian dialects. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195133561.001.0001

Poletto, Cecilia, & Christina Tortora. 2016. Subject clitics. In A. Ledgeway, & M. Maiden (eds), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 772–785. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0047

Putnam, Michael T., & Lara Schwarz. 2017. Predicting the well-formedness of hybrid representations in emergent production. Ms., Penn State University.

Putnam, Michael T., & Robert Klosinski. 2020. The good, the bad, and the gradient: The role of losers in code-switching. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10: 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16008.put

Renzi, Lorenzo, & Laura Vanelli. 1983. I pronomi soggetto in alcune varietà romanze. In Scritti linguistici in onore di Giovan Battista Pellegrini, 121–145. Pisa: Pacini Editore.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986a. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986b. On the status of subject clitics in Romance. Studies in Romance linguistics 24: 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110878516-025

Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In I. Roberts, T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, & M. Sheehan (eds), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770784.002

Rosen, Eric. 2016. Predicting the unpredictable: Capturing the apparent semiregularity of Rendaku voicing in Japanese through Harmonic Grammar. In A. Shen, A. Horan Skilton, G. Bacon, A. Cheng, E. Clem, V. Dawson, & E. Hans Maier (eds), Proceedings of BLS 42, 235–249. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.

Ross, John. 1973a. A fake NP squish. In C.-J. Bailey, & R. Shuy (eds), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 96–140. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Ross, John. 1973b. Nouniness. In O. Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic research, 137–257. Tokyo: TEC Company Ltd.

Runić, Jelena. 2014. A new look at clitics, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis. Ph.D. thesis, UConn.

Schwarz, Lara. 2020. Accepting our mistakes: How variation completes the linguistic puzzle. Talk given at DGfS 42, Universität Hamburg.

Schwarz, Lara, & Michael T. Putnam. 2017. Expanding the pipeline: A prolegomenon to modeling multilingual grammars in LFG. In M. Butt, & T. H. King (eds), Proceedings of the LFG’17 Conference, 368–386. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Sheehan, Michelle. 2006. The EPP and null subjects in Romance. Ph.D. thesis, Newcastle University.

Sheehan, Michelle. 2016. Subjects, null subjects and expletives in Romance. In S. Fischer, & C. Gabriel (eds), Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance, 329–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110311860-014.

Smolensky, Paul, & Matthew Goldrick. 2016. Gradient symbolic representations in grammar: The case of French liaison. ROA 1286.

Smolensky, Paul, & Geraldine Legendre. 2006. The harmonic mind. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Stegovec, Adrian. 2019. Crop to fit: Pronoun size and its relation to strict/sloppy identity and animacy. Talk given at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), New York.

Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the nominative island condition, vacuous application and the that-trace filter. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Zimmermann, Eva. 2019. Gradient symbolic representations and the typology of ghost segments. In A. McCollum, S. Rose, K. Hout, A. Mai, & M. Zaslansky (eds), Proceedings of AMP 2018, 1–12. Linguistic Society of America. https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v7i0.4576

Zimmermann, Eva. 2021. Faded copies: Reduplication as distribution of activity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 58. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1117