As small as they seem? : An experimental investigation of Italian bare participial sentences

Mauro Viganò; Carlo Cecchetto; Caterina Donati

doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.367

As small as they seem?

An experimental investigation of Italian bare participial sentences

Authors

Mauro Viganò Structures Formelles du Langage (CNRS & Université Paris 8)
Carlo Cecchetto Structures Formelles du Langage (CNRS & Université Paris 8); Department of Psychology (Università degli Studi Milano-Bicocca)
Caterina Donati Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle (CNRS & Université Paris Cité)

PDF

Abstract

We present the results of an experimental study designed to investigate the acceptability of bare participial structures in spoken Italian. These sentences, despite being extremely reduced, have full illocutionary force. For the study, we proposed a technique to elicit grammaticality judgements suitable for structures that, although productive, are not used in the written form of the language. Our aim is to investigate the validity of the structural analysis of these sentences (Cecchetto & Donati 2022) according to which they are generated as small as VPs and they are not elliptical structures, i.e., they are not the result of phonological deletions from full-fledged sentences. The findings globally confirm the predictions of that account, as only require the activation of projections beyond the VP-layer, are rated as fully acceptable. However, the corresponding negative structures and some reduced structures with active transitive predicates received intermediate judgments of acceptability, contrary to the predictions. In the paper, we try to account for these unexpected results and argue that phonological deletion is available as well but is subject to tight constraints; most notably, it is restricted to the top of the tree.

Keywords

participial clauses, reduced structures, ellipsis, labeling, acceptability judgements, negation, truncation, experimental syntax

References

Barton, Ellen. 1990. Non sentential constituents. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Belletti, Adriana 1990. Generalized Verb Movement: Aspects of Verb Syntax. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.

Belletti, Adriana 2017. (Past)Participle agreement: a case study. Updated version in M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Comparison to Syntax, Second Edition, 493-521. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati. 2022. Labeling reduced sentences: when VPs are sentences? Linguistic Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00460

Chomsky, Noam. 2019. The UCLA Lectures. lingbuzz/005485.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist program, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8: 81-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.x

D'Alessandro, Roberta & Ian Roberts. 2008. Movement and Agreement in Italian Past Participles and Defective Phases. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.3.477

Donati, Caterina & Carlo Cecchetto. 2023. Variation in Romance: Reduced participial structures in Italian and French, Going Romance, Radboud University.

Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterholzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe &S. Winkler. On information structure, meaning and form. 87-116. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

Gallucci, Marcello. 2019. GAMLj: General analyses for linear models. [jamovi module]. https://gamlj.github.io/

Gibson, Edward & Eve Fedorenko. 2013. The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080

Haegeman, Liliane. 1996. The syntax of negation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Register variation, truncation, and subject omission in English and in French. English Language & Linguistics, 1(2), 233-270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000526

Haegeman, Liliane, & Tabea Ihsane. 2001. Adult Null Subjects in the non-pro-drop Languages: Two Diary Dialects. Language Acquisition, 9(4), 329–346. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20011518

Haegeman, Liliane & Raffaella Zanuttini. 1991. Negative Heads and the NEG Criterion. The Linguistic Review 8. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1991.8.2-4.233.

Hale, Ken & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53-109. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. On External Arguments. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 20: 1, Article 7.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Krifka, Manfred. 1986. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Individualtermen, Aspektklassen. Ph.D. dissertation. Universität München.

Krifka, Manfred. (1992). Thematic Relations as Links Between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution. In A. I. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, 29-53. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.

MacDonald, Jonathan. 2023. An inner aspectual functional projection: evidence from Spanish hacerlo. Going Romance, Radboud University.

Manetta, Emily. 2020. Rarely Used Structures and Lesser-Studied Languages. Insights from the Margins. New York: Routledge.

Manzini, Rita. & Diego Pescarini. 2023. Negative Concord by phase. Manuscript. Università di Firenze & Université Côte d’Azur.

Moens, Marc & Mark Steedman. 1988. Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2): 15-28. https://aclanthology.org/J88-2003

Progovac, Liljana. 2013. Non sentential vs. Ellipsis approaches. Review and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass 7: 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12044

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Sprouse, John, Schütze, Carlson & Diogo Almeida. 2013. A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 134: 219-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002

Sprouse, John & Diogo Almeida. 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48: 609-652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000011

Sprouse, John & Diogo Almeida. 2017. Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments. Glossa 2(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.236

Thrasher, Randolph. 1977. One Way to Say More by Saying Less. A Study of So-Called Subjectless Sentences. Kwansei Gakuin University Monograph Series 11. Tokyo: The Eihosha Ltd.

Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge University Press.

Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2023. Pas de Problème: The Distribution and Nature of Double Negation in French and Other Romance Negative Concord Languages. Languages 8(2): 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020118