Cross-linguistic variation in the expression of ignorance
The case of Spanish and French
Abstract
This article examines the properties of epistemic indefinites (EIs) when pluralized, focusing on the following puzzle: while ignorance is expressed by both singular and plural EIs in a number of languages, e.g. German, only the singular conveys ignorance in languages such as Spanish and French. What is the nature of this parameter? We propose that, despite appearances and, in contrast with the German situation, algunos and French quelques are not lexically related to singular epistemic algún and quelque, respectively. We show that, in these languages, singular EIs give rise to a conventional implicature -- in the sense of Potts (2005)--, rather than a conversational implicature based on Gricean reasoning, as in Alonso-Ovalle & Menéndez-Benito (2011) for Spanish: the ignorance expressed in Spanish and French is inherent to singular EIs. Using evidence from the inclusive/exclusive distinction (Krifka 1989; Sauerland 2003; Farkas & de Swart 2010; Martí 2020), we provide support for the idea that, despite plural morphology, the role of algunos EIs and quelques EIs is to express paucity (adding evidence for Martí (2015) proposal for Spanish).
Keywords
ignorance, epistemic indefinites, plurality, conventional implicatures, paucity, inclusivity, exclusivityReferences
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aloni, Maria & Angelika Port. 2010. Epistemic indefinites crosslinguistically. In Yelena Fainleib, Nicholas LaCara & Yangsook Park (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 41), 29–43. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
Aloni, Maria & Angelika Port. 2015. Epistemic indefinites and methods of identification. In Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Men´endez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain, 117–140. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.001.0001
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2010. Modal indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 18(1). 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl1050-009-9048-4
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2011. Domain restrictions, modal implicatures and plurality: Spanish algunos. Journal of Semantics 28(2). 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq016
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2013a. A note on the derivation of the epistemic effect of Spanish algún as an implicature. In Anamaria Fălăuş (ed.), Alternatives in semantics, 36–49. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317247
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2013b. Two views on epistemic indefinites. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(2). 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12009
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2015. Epistemic indefinites: An overview. In Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain, 1–27. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.001.0001
Amaral, Patricia, Craige Roberts & E. Allyn Smith. 2007. Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(6). 707–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9025-2
Anand, Pranav, Caroline Andrews, Donka Farkas & Matthew Wagers. 2011. The exclusive interpretation of plural nominals in quantificational environments. In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 21), 176–196. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications.
Bale, Alan, Michaël Gagnon & Hrayr Khanjian. 2011a. On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness: The case of plural morphology. Morphology 21(2). 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9158-1
Bale, Alan Clinton, Michaël Gagnon & Hrayr Khanjian. 2011b. Cross-linguistic representations of numerals and number marking. In Nan Li & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 20), 582–598. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2552
Barrie, Michael & Éric Mathieu. 2023. A short note on inclusive and exclusive plurals in Korean. Ms., Sogang University and University of Ottawa.
Birner, Betty J. 2013. Introduction to pragmatics. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley- Blackwell.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, volume 1: In name only. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344
Corblin, Francis. 2004. Quelque. In Francis Corblin & Henrïette de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 99–107. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Culioli, Antoine. 2000. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation : Domaine notionnel, tome 3. Paris: Ophrys.
Dali, Myriam. 2020. Gender and number in Tunisian Arabic: A case of allosemy: University of Ottawa dissertation. https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-24907
Dali, Myriam & Éric Mathieu. 2020. Broken plurals and (mis)matching of ϕ-features in Tunisian Arabic. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 12(2). 164–203. https://doi.org/10.1163/18776930-01202005
Dali, Myriam & Éric Mathieu. 2021. A theory of distributed number. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.269
Dalrymple, Mary, Makoto Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam McHombo & Stanley Peters. 1998. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(2). 159–210.
Dalrymple, Mary & Suriel Mofu. 2013. Semantics of number in Biak. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 14. 42–55.
Etxeberria, Urtzi & Anastasia Giannakidou. 2017. A unified analysis of Spanish algún/algunos: anti-specificity, plurality, and NP-anaphora. Ms., University of Chicago.
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua: Stanford University dissertation.
Faller, Martina. 2006. Evidentiality above and below speech acts. Ms., University of Manchester.
Farkas, Donka. 2002. Varieties of indefinites. In Brendan Jackson (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 12), 59–83. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v12i0.2873
Farkas, Donka. 2003. On singular some. In Claire Beyssade, Olivier Bonami, Patricia C. Hofherr & Francis Corblin (eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 4, 45–62. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
Farkas, Donka. 2006. Free choice in Romanian. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 71–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.80
Farkas, Donka & Henriëtte de Swart. 2010. The semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3. 6.1–54. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.3.6
Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2009. Polarity items and dependent indefinites in Romanian: University of Nantes dissertation.
Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2011a. Alternatives as sources of semantic dependency. In Nan Li & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 20), 406–427. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2546
Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2011b. New challenges in the area of semantically dependent indefinites: The Romanian epistemic constraint. In Julia Herschensohn (ed.), Romance Linguistics 2010, 287–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.318
Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2012. On alternatives in imperatives: The case of Romanian vreun. In Ana Aguilar Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, 239–252.
Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2014. (Partially) free choice of alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 37(2). 121–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-014-9146-8
Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2015. Romanian epistemic indefinites. In Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain, 60–81. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.001.0001
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition and logical form. New
York: Academic Press.
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Josep Quer. 2013. Exhaustive and non-exhaustive variationwith free choice and referential vagueness: Evidence from Greek, Catalan, and Spanish. Lingua 126. 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.005
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Suwon Yoon. 2016. Scalar marking without scalar meaning: Nonscalar, nonexhaustive even-marked NPIs in Greek and Korean. Language 92(3). 522–556. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0047
Gianollo, Chiara. 2013. Latin aliquis as an epistemic indefinite. In Sofiana Chiriacescu (ed.), Proceedings of the VI Nereus International Workshop, 55–81. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
Gianollo, Chiara. 2020. DP-internal inversion and negative polarity: Latin aliquis and its Romance descendants. Probus 32(2). 271–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2020-0005
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Grimm, Scott. 2012a. Individuation and inverse number marking in Dagaare. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 75–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.001.0001
Grimm, Scott. 2012b. Inverse number marking and individuation in Dagaare. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 75–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2008. The semantics of Spanish plural existential determiners and the dynamics of judgment types. Probus 13(1). 113–154. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.13.1.113
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2010. Varieties of indefinites in Spanish. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(8). 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00221.x.
Harbour, Daniel. 2011. Valence and atomic number. Linguistic Inquiry 42(4). 561–594. https://doi.org/10.1162/LINGa00061
Harbour, Daniel. 2014. Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language 90(1).
–229. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0003
Harris, Jesse A. & Christopher Potts. 2009. Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(6). 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9070-5
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198235606.001.0001
Hoeksema, Jack. 1983. Plurality and conjunction. In Alice G. B. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in modeltheoretic semantics, 63–83. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112420768
Horn, Lawrence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Horn, Lawrence R. 2008. “I love me some him”: The landscape of non-argument datives. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 7, 169–192. Paris: Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris.
Izvorkski, Roumyana. 1997. The present perfect as epistemic modal. In Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 7), 222–239. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v7i0.2795
Jayez, Jacques & Lucia M. Tovena. 2002. Determiners and (un)certainty. In Brendan Jackson (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 12), 164–183. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v12i0.2861
Jayez, Jacques & Lucia M. Tovena. 2005. Free choiceness and non-individuation. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(1). 1–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-1072-3
Jayez, Jacques & Lucia M. Tovena. 2006. Epistemic determiners. Journal of Semantics 23(3). 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffl002
Jayez, Jacques & Lucia M. Tovena. 2011. The meaning and (a bit of) history of quelque. In Lucia M. Tovena (ed.), French determiners in and across time, 111–139. London: College Publications.
Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 1–25. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama. 2017. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Contrastiveness in information structure, alternatives and scalar implicatures, 123–143. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877335
Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice- theoretical approach. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820
Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130. 152–168.
Martí, Luisa. 2007. Restoring indefinites to normalcy: An experimental study on the scope of Spanish algunos. Journal of Semantics 24(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffl010
Martí, Luisa. 2008. The semantics of plural indefinite noun phrases in Spanish and Portuguese. Natural Language Semantics 16(1). 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9023-x
Martí, Luisa. 2009. Contextual restriction on indefinites: Spanish algunos vs. unos. In Anastasia Giannakidou & Monika Rathert (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 108–132. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martí, Luisa. 2015. The morphosemantics of Spanish indefinites. In Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney & Carol Rose Little (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 25), 576–594. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3050
Martí, Luisa. 2020. Inclusive plurals and the theory of number. Linguistic Inquiry 51(1). 37–74. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling a 00330
Matthewson, Lisa, Henry Davis & Hotze Rullmann. 2007. Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from st’´at’imcets. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Linguistic variation yearbook 2007, 201–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.7.07mat
Murray, Sarah E. 2010. Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts: Rutgers University dissertation.
Murray, Sarah E. 2014. Varieties of update. Semantics and Pragmatics 7. 6.1–53. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.2
Murray, Sarah E. 2017. The semantics of evidentials. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199681570.001.0001
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42(3). 413–444. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING a 00052
Noyer, Robert Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Paillard, Denis. 2006. Quelque n / quelques n. In Francis Corblin, Sylvie Ferrando & Lucien Kupferman (eds.), Indéfini and prédication, 417–428. Paris: Sorbonne Université Presses.
Partee, Barbara H. 2009. Lecture 8: Conventional implicatures. Ms., Moscow State University.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2014. On number and numberlessness in languages with and without articles. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, 52–72. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261440
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001
Potts, Christopher. 2007a. Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 475–502. Oxford: Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0016
Potts, Christopher. 2007b. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(3). 165–198. https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011
Roberts, Craige. 2006. Only, presupposition and implicature. Ohio State University.
Salmon, William. 2009. Double subjects and conventional implicatures. International Review of Pragmatics 1(2). 249–292. https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12535267111570
Salmon, William. 2011. Conventional implicature, presupposition, and the meaning of must. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3416–3430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.011
Sauerland, Uli. 2003. A new semantics for number. In Robert B. Young & Yuping Zhou (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 13), 258–275. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v13i0.2898
Sauerland, Uli. 2004. On embedded implicatures. Journal of Cognitive Science 5(1). 107–137.
Sauerland, Uli, Jan Andersen & Kazuko Yatsushiro. 2005. The plural is semantically unmarked. In Stephan Kepser & Marga Reis (eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives, 413–434. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1996. Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2704-4
Solt, Stephanie & Jon Stevens. 2018. Some three students: towards a unified account of some. In Sireemas Maspong, Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir, Katherine Blake & Forrest Davis (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 28), 245–265. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4436
Spector, Benjamin. 2007. Aspects on the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, 243–281. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210752
Van de Velde, Danièle. 2000. Les ind´efinis comme adjectifs. In Léonie Bosveld-De Smet, Marleen Van Peteghem & Danièle Van de Velde (eds.), De l’indetermination à la qualification : les indéfinis, 203–270. Arras: Artois Presses Université.
Vázquez Rojas Maldonado, Violeta. 2012. The syntax and semantics of Purépecha noun phrases and the mass/count distinction: New York University dissertation.
Ward, Gregory, Betty J. Birner & Jeffrey P. Kaplan. 2003. A pragmatic analysis of the epistemic would construction in English. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer & Manfred Krug (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 71–79. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339.71
Watanabe, Akira. 2010. Vague quantity, numerals, and natural numbers. Syntax 13(1). 37–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00131.x
Weir, Andrew. 2012. Some, speaker knowledge, and subkinds. In Rasmus K. Rendsvig & Sophia Katenko (eds.), Proceedings of the European Summer School in Language, Logic and Information, Student Session, 180–190. Opole, Poland: University of Opole.
Winter, Yoad. 2001. Plural predication and the strongest meaning hypothesis. Journal of Semantics 18(4). 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.4.333
Wood, Jim. 2012. Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure. New York University New York, NY.
Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz. 2017. The interpretation of external arguments. The verbal domain 255–278.
Zamparelli, Roberto. 2007. On singular existential quantifiers in Italian. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax, 293–328. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4
Zufferey, Sandrine, Jacques Moeschler & Anne Reboul. 2019. Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410875
Zwarts, Joost. 2004. Competition between word meanings: the polysemy of (a)round. In Cècile Meier & Matthias Weisgerber (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 8, 349–360.
Zweig, Eytan. 2009. Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(4). 353–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9064-3
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Eric Mathieu, Simone Zamarlik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
