Differential Object Marking and discourse prominence in Spanish
Abstract
Spanish, like many other Romance and non-Romance languages, shows Differential Object Marking (DOM), i.e., some direct objects are morphologically marked by the prepositional marker a ‘to’, while others remain unmarked. The literature has proposed different sentential parameters in order to capture this variation (Fábregas 2013, among others), including topicality (see Leonetti 2004, Iemmolo 2010, among others). In addition, Laca (1995: 82f.) has argued that DOM also depends on discourse properties. She assumes that in Spanish the use of DOM with an indefinite direct object signals that more information about this object referent is to be expected in the upcoming discourse (see also Comrie 1981/1989). First empirical evidence for this hypothesis comes from DOM in Romanian (Chiriacescu & von Heusinger 2010). In this paper we explore the hypothesis that, in Spanish, human indefinite direct objects with DOM show more forward-looking potential than those without DOM. We present original results from two corpus studies and two paragraph continuation tasks. The corpus studies provide support for the discourse effect of DOM, while the paragraph continuation tasks do not, which might be due to the particular design of our experimental items. We evaluate the different parameters that contribute to the discourse prominence of a direct object with DOM and those that might mask such effects. We conclude that there is evidence that DOM contributes to discourse prominence, but that further studies are necessary.
Keywords
Differential Object Marking, DOM, Spanish, discourse prominence, corpus analysis, paragraph continuation taskReferences
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3), 435–483. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573.
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857473.
Arnold, Jennifer E. 2010. How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(4), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00193.x.
Asher, Nicholas, Vladimir Popescu, Philippe Muller, Stergos Afantenos, Anais Cadilhac, Farah Benamara, Laure Vieu & Pascal Denis. 2012. Manual for the analysis of settlers data. Manuscript.
Barraza, Georgina. 2003. Evolución del objeto directo inanimado ein espanol. Mexico, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Bossong, Georg. 1982. Der präpositionale Akkusativ im Sardischen. In Otto Winkelmann (ed.), Festschrift Johannes Hubschmid zum 65. Geburtstag. Beitrag zur allgemeinen, indogermanischen und romanischen Sprachwissenschaft, 579–599. Bern: Francke
Bossong, Georg. 1985. Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697660.
Bossong, Georg. 1998. Le marquage différentiel de l'objet dans les langues d'Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence, 193–258. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Chiarcos, Christian. 2011. Evaluating salience metrics for the context-adequate realization of discourse referents. In Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG), 32– 43.), 32–43. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/2187681.2187688.
Chiarcos, Christian, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski (eds.). 2011. Salience: Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241020.
Chiriacescu, Sofiana. 2014. The discourse structuring potential of indefinite noun phrases. Special markers in Romanian, German and English. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart dissertation. http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-5395.
Chiriacescu, Sofiana & Klaus von Heusinger. 2010. Discourse prominence and pe-marking in Romanian. International Review of Pragmatics 2(2), 298–332. https://doi.org/10.1163/187731010X528377.
Compensis, Paul, Marco García García, Birgit Hellwig, Sonja Riesberg & Gertrude Schneider-Blum. Submitted. Discourse prominence and special encoding in morphosyntax.
Comrie, Bernard. 1979. Definite and animate direct objects: A natural class. Linguistica Silesiana 3, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3862697.
Comrie, Bernard. 1981/1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993473.
Emonds, Joseph. 2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & Georges Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 75–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178706.
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2009. Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language 33(4), 832–885. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.4.02esc.
Fábregas, Antonio. 2013. Differential Object Marking in Spanish: State of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(2), 1–80. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2603.
Falk, Simone. 2014. On the notion of salience in spoken discourse - prominence cues shaping discourse structure and comprehension. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage 30, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/tipa.1303.
Fuchs, Melanie & Petra B. Schumacher. 2020. Referential shift potential of demonstrative pronouns – evidence from text continuation. In Åshild Næss, Anna Margetts & Yvonne Treis (eds.), Demonstratives in discourse, 185–213. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4055826.
García García, Marco. 2014. Differentielle Objektmarkierung bei unbelebten Objekten im Spanischen. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110290974.
García García, Marco. 2018. Nominal and verbal parameters in the diachrony of differential object marking in Spanish. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking, 209–242. Berlin: Language Science Presss. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1228257.
García García, Marco, Beatrice Primus & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2018. Shifting from animacy to agentivity. Theoretical Linguistics 44 (1–2), 25–39.
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0002
García García, Marco & Javier Caro Reina. To appear. Differential object marking. In Matthias Heinz, Marc-Olivier Hinzelin & Lorenzo Filipponio (eds.), Manual of classification and typology of the Romance languages. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Gerards, David. 2023. Differential Object Marking in the Romance languages. In Michele Loporcaro (ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.648.
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3.01giv.
Grosz, Barbara, Aravind Joshi & Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21, 203–226.
Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2), 274–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/416535.
von Heusinger, Klaus. 2019. Indefiniteness and specificity. In Barbara Abbott & Jeanette Gundel (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Reference, 146–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.9.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Sofiana Chiriacescu. 2011. Pe-marked definite NPs in Romanian and discourse prominence. In Natascha Pomino & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Proceedings of the V Nereus International Workshop "Mismatches in Romance" (Arbeitspapier 125), 33–54. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-159309.
von Heusinger, Klaus, Marco García García & Georg A. Kaiser. 2024. Differential Object Marking and (non-)specificity in Spanish – Some empirical evidence for Leonetti’s Generalization. In Silvia Gumiel, Cristina Sánchez & Ignacio Bosque (eds.), Homenaje póstumo a Manuel Leonetti, Alcala: Universidad de Alcalá. Preprint: https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/GJlYTlmM/
von Heusinger, Klaus & Georg A. Kaiser. 2005. The evolution of differential object marking in Spanish. In Georg A. Kaiser, Klaus von Heusinger & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop "Specificity and the Evolution / Emergence of Nominal Determina-tion in Romance" (Arbeitspapier 119), 33–69. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz. https://d-nb.info/1079847138/34.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Georg A. Kaiser. 2011. Affectedness and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Morphology 21(3–4), 593–617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9177-y.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Petra B. Schumacher. 2019. Discourse prominence: Definition and application. Journal of Pragmatics 154, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.025.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Alina Tigău. 2024. Clitic Doubling and Differential Object Marking in Romanian as Marker for Discourse Prominence. Ms., University of Cologne.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Haydar Batuhan Yıldız. Submitted. The discourse function of Differential Object Marking in Turkish.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Beatrice Primus. 2015. Prominence beyond prosody – A first approximation. In Amedeo De Dominicis (ed.), pS-prominenceS: Prominences in Linguistics. Proceedings of the International Conference, 38–58. University of Tuscia, Viterbo: DISUCOM Press. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/24935/
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2010. Topicality and differential object marking. Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language 34(2), 239–272. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem.
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2011 Differential object marking. Pavia: University of Pavia dissertation. https://zenodo.org/records/4388380.
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina & Anna Pineda. 2022. Differential object marking in Catalan. Descriptive and theoretical aspects. Linguistic Variation 22(2), 325–385. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.20009.iri.
Jasinskaja, Katja, Sofiana Chiriacescu, Marta Donazzan, Klaus von Heusinger & Stefan Hinterwimmer. 2015. Prominence in discourse. In Amedeo De Dominicis (ed.), pS-prominenceS: Prominences in Linguistics. Proceedings of the International Conference, 134–153. Viterbo: DISUCOM Press. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/9893/
Kabatek, Johannes, Philipp Obrist & Albert Wall (eds). 2021. Differential Object Marking in Romance – The third wave. Berlin: De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110716207.
van Kampen, Jacqueline. 2007. Anaphoric topic-shift devices. Paper presented at the ‘Workshop on anaphoric uses of demonstrative expressions’, Siegen.
Kehler, Andrew, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde & Jeffrey L. Elman. 2008. Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics 25(1), 1–44.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm018.
Kızılkaya, Semra. 2024. Affectedness at the morphosyntax-semantics interface. Evidence from Differential Object Marking. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6, 13–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26190905.
Laca, Brenda. 1995. Sobre el uso del acusativo preposicional en español. In Carmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, 61–91. Madrid: Visor.
Laca, Brenda. 2006. El objeto directo. La marcación preposicional. In Concepción Company Company (ed.), Sintaxis historica del español. Primera parte: La frase verbal, vol. 1, 423–475. Mexico: Fondo de cultura económica – Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Ledgeway, Adam, Norma Schifano & Giuseppina Silvestri. 2019. Differential Object Marking and the properties of D in the dialects of the extreme south of Italy. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4(1), 51, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.569.
Leonetti, Manuel. 2004. Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3, 75–114. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.106.
Melis, Chantal. 1995. El objeto directo personal El Cantar de Mio Cid. Estudio sintáctico-pragmático. In Carmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, 133–163. Madrid: Visor.
Melis, Chantal. 2021. From topic marking to definite object marking: Focusing on the beginnings of Spanish DOM. In Johannes Kabatek, Philipp Obrist & Albert Wall (eds.), Differential Object Marking in Romance – The third wave, 39–64. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110716207-003.
Mürmann, Sophie. 2023. Differential Object Marking and role semantics in Romance. Köln: Universität zu Köln dissertation. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/70360/.
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2001. Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics 39, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.006.
Nilsson, Birgit. 1985. Case marking semantics in Turkish. Stockholm: University of Stockholm dissertation.
Pensado, Carmen. 1995. El complemento directo preposicional. Estado de la cuestión y bibliografìa comentada. In Carmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, 11–60. Madrid: Visor.
Pensado, Carmen. 1995. La creación del complemento directo preposicional y la flexión de los pronombres personales en las lenguas románicas. In Carmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, 179–233. Madrid: Visor.
R Core Team. 2023. _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Romero Heredero, Diego. 2022. Marcado diferencial de objeto y semántica verbal en español. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751734.
Romero Heredero, Diego & Marco García García. 2023. Differential object marking in Spanish: The effect of affectedness. Caplletra 74(1), 259–285.
https://doi.org/10.7203/caplletra.74.26043.
Sánchez, Liliana & Pablo Zdrojewski. 2013. Restricciones semánticas y pragmáticas al doblado de clíticos en el español de Buenos Aires y de Lima. Lingüística 29(2), 271–320.
Tigău, Alina. 2022. An experimental study on the discourse properties of Romanian direct objects. Studii de lingvistică 12(2), 85–107.
https://studiidelingvistica.uoradea.ro/docs/12-2-2022/pdf-uri/Tigau.pdf.
Torrego, Esther. 1999. El complemento directo preposicional. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. vol. 2, 1779–1805. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Weissenrieder, Maureen. 1991. A functional approach to the accusative A. Hispania 74(1), 146–156.
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Ilja A. Seržant. 2018. Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In Ilja A. Seržant, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich & Kelsey Mann (eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking, 1–40. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1219168.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Klaus von Heusinger, Tiago Augusto Duarte, Marco Garcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.