Investigating the effect of prosodic markedness on the interpretation of simple disjunction in Romanian
Abstract
According to Horn’s (1984) Principle of Division of Pragmatic Labor, marked forms should have marked meanings. We investigate differences in the interpretation of two prosodically distinct forms of the disjunction sau in Romanian (‘A sau B’): (i) neutral rise-fall prosody, and (ii) marked rise-fall-rise prosody, where both disjuncts are stressed. Adults typically interpret disjunction inclusively (A or B, possibly both) or exclusively (A or B, but not both), while children interpret it inclusively or conjunctively (A and B), cf. Singh et al. (2016) and Tieu et al. (2017). We ask whether similar preferences hold for Romanian and probe into the understudied role of prosody. Given adults’ greater sensitivity to prosody compared to children (Gotzner et al. 2013), we predict they might associate marked sau with the marked exclusive meaning more than children do. We tested Romanian-speaking adults and 5-year-olds using a forced-choice task, in which two puppets made guesses about what would happen, using either neutral sau or marked sau. While adults preferred neutral sau to describe contexts in which both disjuncts were true and marked sau for contexts in which only one disjunct was true, children selected the two disjunctions indiscriminately. We conclude that, unlike adults, children do not distinguish between prosodically marked and unmarked forms of disjunction.
Keywords
Romanian, first language, disjunction, markedness, prosody, experimental linguisticsReferences
Armstrong, Meghan. 2014. Child comprehension of intonationally-encoded disbelief. In W. Orman, & M. J. Valleau (eds), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 25–38. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Armstrong, Meghan. 2020. Children’s epistemic inferences through modal verbs and prosody. Journal of Child Language 47(6): 1132–1169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000916
Barner, David, Brooks, Neon, & Alan Bale. 2011. Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition 118(1): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.010
Bartels, Christine. 1999. The Intonation of English Statements and Questions. New York: Garland.
Biezma, María, & Kyle Rawlins. 2012. Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 35(5): 361–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9123-z/
Bîlbîie, Gabriela. 2008. A syntactic account of Romanian correlative coordination from a Romance perspective. In S. Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 25–45. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bleotu, Adina Camelia. 2021a. Deriving scalar implicatures in Romanian 7-and 9-year-olds. In A. Sevcenco, L. Avram, & V. Tomescu (eds), L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning: The view from Romance, 332–353. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bleotu Adina Camelia. 2021b. 5-Year-Olds Are Precise with Cardinals: Experimental Evidence from Romanian Child Language. Chapter 15. In M. Tǎnase-Dogaru, A. Tigǎu, & M. Zamfirescu (eds), (De)Constructing Language Structure and Meaning. Studies on Syntax, Semantics, Language Acquisition, and Phonology, 303–322. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-5275-7001-6
Bleotu, Adina Camelia, Benz, Anton, & Nicole Gotzner. 2021. Shadow-playing with Romanian 5-year-olds. Epistemic adverbs are a kind of magic. In A. Beltrama, F. Schwarz, & A. Papafragou (eds), Experiments in Linguistic Meaning, vol. 1, 59–70. Linguistic Society of America.
Bleotu, Adina Camelia, Benz, Anton, & Nicole Gotzner. 2022. Romanian 5-year-olds derive global but not local implicatures with quantifiers embedded under epistemic adverbs: Evidence from a Shadow Play Paradigm. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 26, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2022.v26i0.993
Bleotu, Adina Camelia, Ivan, Rodica, Nicolae, Andreea Cristina, Bîlbîie, Gabriela, Benz, Anton, Panaitescu, Mara, & Lyn Tieu. 2023a. Not all complex disjunctions are alike: On inclusive and conjunctive interpretations in child Romanian. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 45, 3062–3069. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jv5n0km
Bleotu, Adina Camelia, Slăvuțeanu, Gabriela, & Anton Benz. 2023b. The role of intonation and context in lack of necessity meanings in negated deontic necessity modals in child Romanian. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 33, 541–562. https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/33.027/5249
Bleotu, Adina Camelia, Tieu, Lyn, Bîlbîie, Gabriela, Benz, Anton, Panaitescu, Mara, Ivan, Rodica, & Andreea Cristina Nicolae. 2024. On the conjunctive interpretation of the disjunction fie...fie in child Romanian. To appear in Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 28. Ruhr University Bochum.
Boersma, Paul, & David Weenink. 2022. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.2.06. Retrieved from https://www.praat.org. http://www.praat.org/.
Braine, Martin D. S., & Barbara Rumain. 1981. Children’s comprehension of ‘or’: evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31(1): 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(81)90003-5/
Chierchia, Gennaro, Crain, Stephen, Guasti, Maria Teresa, Gualmini, Andrea, & Luisa Meroni. 2001. The Acquisition of Disjunction: Evidence for a Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez, & A. Johansen (eds), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 157–168. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Choi, Youngon, & Reiko Mazuka. 2003. Young children’s use of prosody in sentence parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32: 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022400424874
Crain, Stephen, Ni, Weijia, & Laura Conway. 1994. Chapter 18. Learning, parsing and modularity. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, K. Rayner, & C. Clifton (eds), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. New York: Psychology Press.
Demuth, Katherine, Culberston, Jennifer, & Jennifer Alter. 2006. Word-minimality, epenthesis and coda licensing in the early acquisition of English. Language and Speech 49(2): 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309060490020201
Felton, Casey, & Masoud Jasbi. 2023. Prior beliefs about the compatibility of disjuncts impact the exclusivity implication of disjunction. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 45, 3062–3069. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/80t257zh.
Foppolo, Francesca, Guasti, Maria Teresa, & Gennaro Chierchia. 2012. Scalar implicatures in child language: Give children a chance. Language Learning and Development 8: 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.626386
Fraundorf, Scott H., Watson, Douane G., & Aaron S. Benjamin. 2010. Recognition memory reveals just how contrastive CONTRASTIVE accenting really is. Journal of Memory and Language 63(3): 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.004
Gotzner, Nicole, Spalek, Katharina, & Isabell Wartenburger. 2013. How pitch accents and focus particles affect the recognition of contextual alternatives. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (eds), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2434–2440. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Gotzner, Nicole, Wartenburger, Isabell, & Spalek, Katharina. 2016. The impact of focus particles on the recognition and rejection of contrastive alternatives. Language and Cognition 8: 59–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.25
Göbel, Alexander, & Eszter Ronai. 2023. On the meaning of intonational contours: a view from scalar inference. In J. Kim, B. Öney, Y. Zhang, & F. L. Zhao (eds), Semantics and Linguistic Theory 33, 439–459. CLC Publications.
Gualmini, Andrea, Crain, Stephen, Meroni, Luisa, Chierchia, Gennaro, & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2001. At the semantics-pragmatics interface in child language. In H. Rachel, B. Jackson, & Z. Zvolenszky (eds), Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11, 231–247. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Han, Chung-Hye, & Maribel Romero. 2004a. Disjunction, focus, and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 35(2): 179–217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4179271
Han, Chung-Hye, & Maribel Romero. 2004b. The syntax of whether/Q... or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22(3): 527–564. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4048096
Huang, Haiquan, & Stephen Crain. 2020. When OR is assigned a conjunctive inference in child language. Language Acquisition 27(1): 74–97. DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2019.1659273
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984 (GURT ’84). Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Ito, Kiwako, Jincho, Nobuyuki, Minai, Utako, Yamane, Naoto, & Reiko Mazuka. 2012. Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: Evidence from Japanese adults and 6-year-olds. Journal of Memory and Language 66: 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.002
Jasbi, Masoud, Jaggi, Akshay, & Michael C. Frank. 2018. Conceptual and prosodic cues in child directed speech can help children learn the meaning of disjunction. Cognitive Science. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:46676615
Jasbi, Masoud, Jaggi, Akshay, Clark, Eve V., & Michael C. Frank. 2022. Context-dependent learning of linguistic disjunction. Journal of Child Language, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000502
Jitcă, Doina, Apopei, Vasile, & Magdalena Jitcă. 2009. The F0 contour modelling as functional accentual unit sequences. International Journal of Speech Technology 12 (2): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-009-9055-3
Jitcă, Doina, Apopei, Vasile, Păduraru, Otilia, & Samuil Maruşca. 2015. Transcription of Romanian intonation. In S. Frota, & P. Prieto (eds), Intonation in Romance, 284–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meertens, Erlinde, Egger, Sophie, & Maribel Romero. 2019. Multiple accent in alternative questions. In M. T. Espinal, E. Castroviejo, M. Leonetti, L. McNally, & C. Real-Puigdollers (eds), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23, vol. 2, 179–196. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra.
Nicolae, Andreea Cristina, & Uli Sauerland. 2016. A contest of strength: or versus either–or. In N. Bade, P. Berezovskaya, & A. Schöller (eds), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 20, 551–568.
Nicolae, Andreea Cristina, Petrenco, Aliona, Tsilia, Anastasia, & Paul Marty. 2024. Exclusivity of Disjunction(s): A Cross-Linguistic Study. To appear in Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 28. Ruhr University Bochum.
Noveck, Ira. 2001. When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition 78: 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00114-1
Ozturk, Ozge, & Anna Papafragou. 2015. The acquisition of epistemic modality: From semantic meaning to pragmatic interpretation. Language Learning and Development 11(3): 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.905169
Papafragou, Anna, & Julien Musolino. 2003. Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition 86(3): 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8
Paris, Scott G. 1973. Comprehension of language connectives and propositional logical relationships. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16(2): 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(73)90167-7
Pruitt, Kathryn, & Floris Roelofsen. 2013. The interpretation of prosody in disjunctive questions. Linguistic Inquiry 44(4): 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00141
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Vienna.
Roelofsen, Floris, & Sam van Gool. 2010. Disjunctive questions, intonation, and highliting. In H. B. M. Aloni, & T. de Jager (eds), Logic, Language and Meaning: Selected Papers from the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, 384–394. Heidelberg: Springer.
Sauerland, Uli, & Kazuko Yatsushiro. 2018. The Acquisition of Disjunctions: Evidence from German Children. In R. Trsuwell, C. Cummins, C. Heycock, B. Rabern, & H. Rohde (eds), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21, vol. 2, 1065–1072.
Sekerina, Irina A., & John C. Trueswell. 2012. Interactive processing of contrastive expression by Russian children. First Language 32: 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711403981
Singh, Raj, Wexler, Ken, Astle-Rahim, Andrea, Kamawar, Deepthi, & Danny Fox. 2016. Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development. Natural Language Semantics 24(4): 305–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-016-9126-3
Skordos, Dimitrios, Feiman, Roman, Bale, Alan, & David Barner. 2020. Do children interpret ‘or’ conjunctively? Journal of Semantics 37(2): 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz022
Slobin, Dan Isaac. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ch. A. Ferguson, & D. I. Slobin (eds), Studies in child language development, 175–208. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
Snedeker, Jesse, & Sylvia Yuan. 2008. Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language 58: 574–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001
Spalek, Katharina, Gotzner, Nicole, & Isabell Wartenburger. 2014. Not only the apples: Focus-sensitive particles improve memory for information-structural alternatives. Journal of Memory and Language 70(1): 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.001
Stoicescu, Ioana, Sevcenco, Anca, & Larisa Avram. 2015. The acquisition of scalar implicatures in child Romanian. In M. Burada, & O. Tatu (eds), Proceedings of Conference on British and American Studies, 141–155. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tieu, Lyn, Romoli, Jacopo, Zhou, Peng, & Stephen Crain. 2016. Children’s knowledge of free choice inferences and scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics 33(2): 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffv001
Tieu, Lyn, Yatsushiro, Kazuko, Cremers, Alexandre, Romoli, Jacopo, Sauerland, Uli, & Emmanuel Chemla. 2017. On the role of alternatives in the acquisition of simple and complex disjunctions in French and Japanese. Journal of Semantics 34: 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffw010
Tulling, Maxime Alexandra, & Ailís Cournane. 2022. Wishes before ifs: mapping ‘fake’ past tense to counterfactuality in wishes and conditionals. Language Development Research 2(1). https://doi.org/10.34842/2022.0559
Yatsushiro, Kazuko, Sugawara, Ayaka, & Uli Sauerland. 2019. Quantifier scope and intonation in German. In M. M. Brown, & B. Dailey (eds), Proceedings of the 43rd Boston University Conference on Language Development, 730–743. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Adina Camelia Bleotu, Lyn Tieu, Gabriela Bîlbîie, Mara Panaitescu, Gabriela Slăvuţeanu, Anton Benz, Andreea Cristina Nicolae
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
