Structural and sociolectal limits of variability of que in Mexican Spanish noun clefts
Abstract
This paper investigates the structural and sociolectal limits of the use of non-standard “plain” que instead of the standard relativizer DET+que in Mexican Spanish noun clefts. Although plain que in Spanish noun clefts is considered ungrammatical by reference grammars, we find it in data from Felipe Carrillo Puerto (Quintana Roo, Yucatan) and Mexico City (CDMX). Among the speakers from CDMX, only younger speakers use plain que in our data, suggesting that it might be a more recent innovation in this variety. Among Yucatecan speakers, we find that bilingual speakers (Spanish-Maya) tend to use more plain que than monolingual Spanish speakers, and only bilingual speakers show similar age effects to those found in CDMX, whereas older monolingual Yucatecan speakers use more plain que than younger YS monolinguals. Structurally, plain que is limited to canonical clefts, which we interpret as an indication that clefts with plain que constitute functionally reanalyzed headed relatives. Moreover, we find that those speakers that use plain que do so mostly when the antecedent is specific and carries a determiner. If the antecedent is either non-specific or does not carry a determiner, DET+que is generally preferred.
Keywords
Spanish, Mexico, variation, clefts, complementizer, syntax, sociolinguistics, relative clause, bilingualism, ageReferences
Audacity Team. 2017. Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer program]. V. 2.1.3, 2nd ed.
Auhagen, Patrick, & Melanie Uth. 2022. Variation of Relative Complementizers in Yucatecan Spanish: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers. Languages, 7(4), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040279
Baayen, R. Harald, Endresen, Anna, Janda, Laura A., Makarova, Anastasia, & Tore Nesset. 2013. Making choices in Russian: pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics, 37(3): 253–291.
Bayley, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, & Lori Sand. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language variation and change, 3(3): 241-264.
Bentivoglio, Paola, & Mercedes Sedano. 2017. El uso del que galicado en el español actual. Boletín de Lingüística, 29(47-48): 112-124.
Bertollo, Sabrina. 2014. On relatives with a null head: German free relative clauses and clefts. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Padova.
Borzi, Claudia Beatriz. 2018. La conceptualización del antecedente como explicación que unifica cuatro fenómenos marginados por los gramáticos. Cuadernos de la ALFAL, 10: 22-44.
Brucart, José M. 1992. Some asymmetries in the functioning of relative pronouns in Spanish. Catalan working papers in linguistics, 2: 113-143.
Brucart, Josep M. 2016. Oraciones de Relativo. In Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, 1st ed. Edited by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. London: Routledge.
Caponigro, Ivano. 2002. Free relatives as DPs with a silent D and a CP complement. In Vida Samiian (ed.), Proceedings of the western conference on linguistics 2000 (WECOL 2000), 140–150. Fresno: California State University.
De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2017. Cleft constructions. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 536–568. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Clahsen, Harald, & Claudia Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied psycholinguistics, 27(1): 3-42.
Clahsen, Harald, & Claudia Felser. 2018. Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3): 693-706.
Cru, Josep. 2015. Language revitalisation from the ground up: promoting Yucatec Maya on Facebook. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(3): 284-296.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2021. The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of focus in syntax. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 3. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1100
Cruschina, Silvio. 2022. Focus and focus structures in the Romance languages. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics: 1-48.
Cruschina, Silvio, & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2017. Focus Fronting. In Andreas Durfter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 502–535. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Cuervo, Rufino José. 1907. Apuntaciones críticas sobre el Lenguaje Bogotano, 5th ed. Muy Aumentada y en su Mayor Parte Completamente Refundida. Paris: Ruger & Chernoviz.
Di Tullio, Ángela. 1990. Sobre hendidas y pseudohendidas. Revista de Lengua y Literatura, 4(7): 03-16.
Di Tullio, Ángela. 2006. Clefting in spoken discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encycl. of Language & Linguistics, 483-491. Oxford: Elsevier.
Di Tullio, Ángela. 2014. Manual de gramática del español. 2e éd. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Waldhuter Editores.
Di Tullio, Ángela, & Rolf Kailuweit. 2012. Las oraciones copulativas enfáticas del español y sus varias realizaciones. In F. Lebsanft, W. Mihatsch & C. Polzin-Haumann (eds.), El español, ¿desde las variedades a la lengua pluricéntra?, 141-160. Madrid, Spain: Iberoamericana.
Dufter, Andreas. 2010. El que galicado: Distribución y descripción gramatical. In Carsten Sinner & Alfonso Zamorana Aguilar (eds.), La excepción en la Gramática Española, 255-280. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert.
Feldhausen, Ingo, & Maria del Mar Vanrell. 2015. Oraciones hendidas y marcación del foco estrecho en español: Una aproximación desde la Teoría de la Optimidad Estocástica. Revista internacional de lingüística iberoamericana, 13(26): 39-60.
Fliessbach, Jan, Martínez García, Nuria, & Melanie Uth. 2024. The Production of Post-Lexical Prosodic Prominence in Yucatec Maya and its Perception by Speakers of Yucatecan Spanish. International Journal of American Linguistics, 90(2): 185-226.
Gertken, Libby M, Amengual, Mark, & David Birdsong. 2014. Assessing language dominance with the Bilingual Language Profile. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds, & H. Hilton (eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: perspectives from SLA, 208-225. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
[INEGI] Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2020. Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020.
Martínez García, Nuria, & Melanie Uth. 2019. Lack of Syllable Duration as a Post-Lexical Acoustic Cue in Spanish in Contact with Maya. Languages 4, no. 4: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4040084
Gries, Stefan Th. 2020. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 617-647. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0078
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2017. Clefts and focus in Yucatec Maya. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México, 4(1), 5-47.
Han, Chung-hye, & Nancy Hedberg. 2008. Syntax and semantics of it-clefts: A tree adjoining grammar analysis. Journal of Semantics, 25(4): 345-380.
Von Heusinger, Klaus. 2002. Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of semantics, 19(3): 245-274.
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt, & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical statistics, 15(3): 651-674. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933
Hothorn, Torsten, & Achim Zeileis. 2015. partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 16(1): 3905-3909.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kiss, Katalin. É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74(2): 245-273.
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19(3): 273-309.
[NGE 2009] Real Academia Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Libros.
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A Framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions. In: Linguistics 39: 463-516. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.021
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1987. Estudios sobre el español de Yucatán. Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma de México.
Martín-Butragueño, Pedro. 2022. El español en México. In Francisco Moreno-Fernández & Rocío Caravedo (eds.), Dialectología hispánica / The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Dialectology, 304-318. London/New York: Routledge.
Michnowicz, Jim. 2006a. Final -m in Yucatan Spanish: a rapid and anonymous survey. In Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (ed.), New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics. Vol. 2: Phonetics, phonology, and dialectology. Selected papers from the 35th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Austin, Texas, February 2005, 155–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Michnowicz, Jim. 2006b. Linguistic and social variables in Yucatán Spanish. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, The Graduate School.
Michnowicz, Jim. 2007. El habla de Yuacatám: Final [m] in a Dialect in Contact. In Jonathan Holmquist, Augusto Lorenzino, and Lotfi Sayahi (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 38-42. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Michnowicz, Jim. 2008. Final nasal variation in Mérida, Yucatan. Spanish in Context 5(2): 278–303.
Michnowicz, Jim. 2015. Subject pronoun expression in contact with Maya in Yucatan Spanish”. In Ana Maria Carvalho, Rafael Orozco, & Naomi Lapidus Shin, (eds.): Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective, 103-121. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Percus, Orin. 1997. Prying open the cleft. In Proceedings of the NELS, vol. 27: 337–351.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: essays in comparative syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smits, Reinier J. C. 1989. The relative and cleft constructions of the Germanic and Romance languages. Doctoral thesis, Tilburg University.
Sobrino Gómez, Carlos Martín. 2010. Cantacto lingüístico maya-español: Transferencias en la morfosintaxis del español yucateco. Temas Antropológicos, 32(1): 79–94.
Sornicola, Rosanna. 1988. It-clefts and wh-clefts: Two awkward sentence types. Journal of Linguistics 24(2). 343–379.
Suárez Molina, Victor M. 1996. El español que se habla en Yucatán: Apuntamientos filológicos. Mérida and Mexico: La Universidad de Yucatán.
Suñer, Margarita. 2000. Some Thoughts on que: Description, Theory and L2. Hispania 83: 867-876
Tagliamonte, Sali. A., & Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language variation and change, 24(2), 135-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129
Uth, Melanie. 2016. Prosodic realization of contrastive focus in Yucatecan Spanish. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 67(1), 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1515/roja-2016-0017
Uth, Melanie. 2018. Language contact as a developmental co-determinant between systems and exemplars. Spanish and Yucatec Maya in Quintana Roo. Habilitationsschrift, Universität zu Köln.
Uth, Melanie. 2022. Labialization of Word-Final Nasals in Yucatecan Spanish and Yucatec Maya: Language Contact, Prosodic Prominence Marking, and Local Identity. Journal of Language Contact, 14(3): 646-683.
Uth, Melanie & Nuria Martinez Garcia. 2022. Circumflex nuclear configurations in Yucatecan Spanish as a supraregional feature: The roles of bilingualism and gender. Language and Speech, 65(4): 833-858.
Uth, Melanie, & Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo. 2020. Language contact and intonation: Evidence from contrastive focus marking and loanwords in Yucatecan Spanish and Yucatec Maya. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 97(1): 31-58.
Uth, Melanie, Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo, & Jan Fliessbach. 2024. On the incompatibility of object fronting and progressive aspect in Yucatec Maya. Front. Lang. Sci. 2:1286520. https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2023.1286520
Verhoeven, Elisabeth, & Stavros Skopeteas. 2015. Licensing focus constructions in Yucatec Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics, 81(1): 1-40.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Patrick Auhagen, Jan Fliessbach
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.