Patterns of variation in existential constructions

Silvio Cruschina


The main goal of the present paper is twofold: on the one hand, to highlight the patterns of variation among the existential constructions found in Italo-Romance and Sardinian dialects; on the other, to examine the observed microvariation in a comparative perspective in order to identify common properties and general tendencies. Starting from a description of the variation concerning the primary components of existentials and depending on the copula selected, I show that, irrespective of the superficial morphosyntactic variation attested, all Italo-Romance existential constructions share a fundamental property: their distinguishing features can all be viewed as the reflex of the persistence of formal properties continuing or overlapping with a source construction. This construction is either the locative predication, when be is selected, or the possessive structure, when the existential copula is have. The pivot of the existential construction therefore shows properties typical of arguments, which are however subject to a high degree of instability and variation because it has been semantically reanalysed as the predicate of an abstract contextual domain serving as the argument of the existential proposition. This mismatch between the syntactic and the semantic characteristics of existential structures contributes to the microvariation encountered.


existential construction; locative; possessive; Italo-Romance; Sardinian

Full Text:



Abbott, Barbara. 1993. “A pragmatic account of the Definiteness Effect in existential sentences”. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 39-55.

Abbott, Barbara. 1997. “Definiteness and existentials”. Language 73: 103-108.

Aissen, Judith. 2003. “Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21: 435-483.

Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2006. “Clitic doubling”. In M. Everaert, H. Van Riemsdijk, R. Goedemans and B. Hollebrandse (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. I, 519-581. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Avelar, Juanito. 2009. “On the emergence of TER as an existential verb in Brazilian Portuguese”. In P. Crisma and G. Longobardi (eds.), Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, 158-175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Babby, Leonard. 1980. Existential Sentences and Negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.

Badía Margarit, Antonio. 1951. Gramática histórica catalana. Barcelona: Editorial Noguer, S. A.

Beaver, David, Francez, Itamar and Dmitry Levinson. 2005. “Bad subject: (Non-) canonicality and NP distribution in existentials”. In E. G. and J. Howell (eds.), Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory XV, 19-43. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Benincà, Paola. 1988. “L’ordine degli elementi della frase. Costruzioni con ordine marcato degli elementi”. In L. Renzi (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. Volume 1: La frase. I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale, 129-194. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Benincà, Paola. 1994. La variazione sintattica. Studi di dialettologia romanza. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Benincà, Paola. 2001. “The position of Topic and Focus in the Left Periphery”. In G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 39-64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Benincà, Paola. 2007. “Clitici e ausiliari: gh ò, z é”. In D. Bentley and A. Ledgeway (eds.), Sui dialetti italoromanzi. Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent (The Italianist 27, Special Supplement 1), 27-47. King’s Lynn: Biddles.

Bentley, Delia. 2004. “Definiteness effects: evidence from Sardinian”. Transactions of the Philological Society 102 (1): 57-101.

Bentley, Delia. 2010. “Principles of subject markedness in Romance”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 95 (2): 152-189.

Bentley, Delia. 2011. “Sui costrutti esistenziali sardi. Effetti di definitezza, deissi, evidenzialità”. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 127 (1): 111-140.

Bentley, Delia. 2013. “Subject markedness and Definiteness Effects in Romance there sentences”. Language 89 (4): 675-712.

Bentley, Delia and Francesco Maria Ciconte. forthcoming. “Copular and existential constructions”. In A. Ledgeway and M. Maiden (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages (Chapter 51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bentley, Delia and Silvio Cruschina. forthcoming. “Existential Constructions”. In S. Fisher and C. Gabriel (eds.), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bentley, Delia, Ciconte, Francesco Maria and Silvio Cruschina. 2013a. “Existential constructions in crosslinguistic perspective”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25: 1-13.

Bentley, Delia, Ciconte, Francesco Maria and Silvio Cruschina. 2013b. “Microvariation in subject agreement: The case of existential pivots with split focus in Italo-Romance”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25: 15-43.

Bentley, Delia, Ciconte, Francesco Maria and Silvio Cruschina. in press. Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale, Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.

Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.

Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 2003. “Tipologia delle presentative romanze e morfosintassi storica. Fr. c'est e prov. -i (estai, fai, plai)”. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 119: 51-90.

Bossong, Georg. 1991. “Differential object marking in Romance and beyond”. In Dieter Wanner and Douglas A. Kibbee (eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 1988, 143-170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Brown, Esther L. and Javier Rivas. 2012. “Grammatical relation probability: How usage patterns shape analogy”. Language Variation and Change 24: 317-341.

Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2006. “‘Arbitrary’ pro and the theory of pro-drop”. In P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Schoorlemmer and F. Weerman (eds.), Agreement and Arguments, 230-258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Casalicchio, Jan. 2013. Pseudorelative, gerundi e infiniti nelle varietà romanze: somiglianze (solo) superficiali e corrispondenze strutturali. Munich: LINCOM.

Cennamo, Michela. 2011. “Impersonal constructions and accusative subjects in Late Latin”. In A. Malchukov and A. Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 167-188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ciconte, Francesco Maria. 2009. “Pro-forms in existential constructions of Early Italo-Romance vernaculars”. In G. Kaiser and E-M. Remberger (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null-subjects, expletives, and locatives in Romance”, 183-198. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Konstanzer Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft (No. 123).

Ciconte, Francesco Maria. 2010. Existential Constructions of Early Italo-Romance Vernaculars. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Manchester. To appear in the Monograph Series of The Philological Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Ciconte, Francesco Maria. 2011. “The emergence and the reanalysis of the existential proform: Evidence from Early Italo-Romance”. Transactions of the Philological Society 109 (3): 284-306.

Ciconte, Francesco Maria. 2013. “Argument realization and existential pro-forms in early Italo-Romance”. In E. van Gelderen, J. Barðdal and M. Cennamo (eds.), Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples-Capri Papers, 549-566. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Clark, Eve. 1978. “Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions”. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 4, 85-126. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Cornilescu, Alexandra. 2009. “Restructuring strategies of the Romanian verb fi ‘be’ and the analysis of existential sentences”. In G. Kaiser and E-M. Remberger (eds.), Null subjects, expletives and locatives in Romance, 199-230. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Konstanzer Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft (No. 123).

Creissels, Denis. 2013. “Control and the evolution of possessive and existential constructions”. In E. van Gelderen, J. Barðdal and M. Cennamo (eds.), Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples-Capri Papers, 461-476. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. “Focus in existential sentences”. In V. Bianchi and C. Chesi (eds.), Enjoy linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, 77-107. Siena: CISCL Press. Available online at: .

Cruschina, Silvio. 2014. “Existential and locative constructions in Italo-Romance”. L’Italia Dialettale 75: 55-80.

Czinglar, Christine. 2002. “Decomposing existence: Evidence from Germanic”. In W. Abraham and J-W. Zwart (eds.), Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology, 85-126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1990. “Clitic doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian”. Linguistic Inquiry 21 (3): 351-397.

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1994. The Syntax of Romanian. Comparative Studies in Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Foley, William A. and Robert D. Jr. Van Valin. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Francez, Itamar. 2007. Existential Propositions. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.

Freeze, Ray. 1992. “Existentials and other locatives”. Language 68 (3): 553-595.

Freeze, Ray. 2001. “Existential constructions”. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, 941-953. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Green, Lisa J. 2002. African America English. A Linguistics Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haiman, John and Paola Benincà. 1992. The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. London: Routledge.

Hazout, Ilan. 2004. “The syntax of existential constructions”. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 393-430.

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession. Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hopper, Paul and Sandra Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse”. Language 56: 251-299.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986a. “Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction”. In H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, 15-42. New York: Academic Press.

Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986b. “Arbitrary plural pronominals”. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 43-76.

Jones, Michael A. 1988. “Sardinian”. In M. Harris and N. Vincent (eds.), The Romance Languages, 314-350. London: Routledge.

Jones, Michael A. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.

Kallulli, Dalina. 2008. “There is secondary predication in there-existentials”. In C. B. Chang and H. J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 279-287. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Kayne, Richard S. 1993. “Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection”. Studia Linguistica 47: 3-31.

Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kayne, Richard S. 2008. “Expletives, datives and the tension between morphology and syntax”. In T. Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation, 175-218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Koch, Peter. 2012. “Location, existence, and possession: A constructional-typological exploration”. Linguistics 50 (3): 533-603.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. “Stage-level and individual-level predicates”. In G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, 125-175. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

La Fauci, Nunzio and Michele Loporcaro. 1993. “Grammatical relations and syntactic levels in Bonorvese morphosyntax”. In A. Belletti (ed.), Syntactic theory and the dialects of Italy, 155-203. Torino, Rosenberg & Sellier.

La Fauci, Nunzio and Michele Loporcaro. 1997. “Outline of a theory of existentials on evidence from Romance”. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica e applicata 26: 5-55.

Laca, Brenda. 1987. “Sobre el uso del acusativo preposicional en español”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 38: 290-312.

Lambrecht, Knud. 2000. “When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence focus constructions across languages”. Studies in Language 24 (3): 611-682.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2008. “Sulla storia dei verbi copulari dei dialetti dell’alto Meridione: Il caso del napoletano”. The Italianist 28: 281-301.

Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Lenz, Alexandra N. 2007a. “Zur Grammatikalisierung von geben im Deutschen und Letzebuergeschen”. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 35: 52-82.

Lenz, Alexandra N. 2007b. “About the grammaticalization of geben 'to give'”. In S. Elspaß, N. Langer, J. Scharloth and W. Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic Language Histories 'from below' (1700-2000), 163-178. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

Leonetti, Manuel. 2004. “Specificity and object marking: The case of Spanish a”. In K. von Heusinger and G. Kaiser (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages”, 67-101. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Konstanzer Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft (No. 113).

Leonetti, Manuel. 2008a. “Definiteness Effects and the role of the coda in existential constructions”. In H. H. Müller and A. Klinge (eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination, 131-162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Leonetti, Manuel. 2008b. “Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking”. Probus 20: 35-69.

Longa, Víctor, Guillermo Lorenzo and Gemma Rigau. 1998. “Subject clitics and clitic recycling: locative sentences in some Iberian Romance languages”. Journal of Linguistics 34: 125-164.

Lurà, Franco. 1987. Il dialetto del Mendrisiotto: Descrizione sincronica e confronto coll’italiano. Mendrisio and Chiasso: Unione di Banche Svizzere.

Lyons, John. 1967. “A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences”. Foundations of Language 3: 390-396.

Maiden, Martin. 1995. A Linguistic History of Italian. London: Longman.

Manzini, Maria Rita and Leonardo Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.

Marten, Lutz. 2013. “Structure and interpretation in Swahili existential constructions”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25: 45–73.

McNally, Louise. 1992. An Interpretation for the English Existential Construction. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1997.

McNally, Louise. 2011. “Existential sentences”. In Claudia Maienborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2, 1829-1848. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. thesis, MIT. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1979.

Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moro, Andrea. 1998. “Esserci et averci: Les clitiques sujets et une analyse en «petite proposition» pour avere”. In A. Rouveret (ed.), ÊTRE et AVOIR – syntaxe, semantique, typologie, 155-170. Saint Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.

Nocentini, Alberto. 1999. “Topical Constraints on Verbal Agreement of Spoken Italian (Tuscan Variety)”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 11 (2): 315-339.

Parry, Mair. 2010. “Non-canonical subjects in the early Italian vernaculars”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 95: 190-226.

Partee, Barbara H. and Vladimir Borschev. 2002. “Genitive of negation and scope of negation in Russian existential sentences”. In J. Toman (ed.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Ann Arbor Meeting 2001 (FASL 10), 181-200. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publication.

Partee, Barbara H. and Vladimir Borschev. 2007. “Existential sentences, BE, and the genitive of negation in Russian”. In I. Comorovski and K. von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and Syntax, 147-190. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pinto, Manuela. 1997. Licensing and Interpretation of Inverted Subjects in Italian. Utrecht: UiL OTS Dissertation Series.

Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Posner, Rebecca. 1996. The Romance Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rando, Emily and Donna J. Napoli. 1978. “Definites in there-sentences”. Language 54: 300-313.

Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2009. “Null Subjects, Expletives and Locatives in Sardinian”. In G. Kaiser and E-M. Remberger (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null subjects, expletives and locatives in Romance”, 231-261. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Konstanzer Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft (No. 123).

Rigau, Gemma. 1994. “Catalan presentational sentences and the properties of Agr nodes”. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, 343-359. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Rigau, Gemma. 1997. “Locative sentences and related constructions in Catalan: ésser / haver alternation”. In A. Mendikoetxea and M. Uribe-Etxebarría (eds.), Theoretical Issues at the Morphology-Syntax Interface, 395-421. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.

Rodríguez Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2006. “Spanish existentials and other accusative constructions”. In C. Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist Essays, 326-394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti: Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.

Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1977. Grammatica storica dei dialetti italogreci (Calabria, Salenti). Nuova edizione interamente rielaborata ed aggiornata. Munich: Beck.

Rossi Taibbi, Giuseppe and Girolamo Caracausi. 1959. Testi neogreci di Calabria. Palermo: Istituto Siciliano di Studi Bizantini e Neogreci.

Saccon, Graziella. 1993. Post-verbal Subjects: A Study Based on Italian and Its Dialects. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.

Sheehan, Michelle. 2006. The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance. Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle.

Sheehan, Michelle. 2010. “‘Free’ inversion in Romance and the Null Subject Parameter”. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts and M. Sheehan, Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, 231-262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sorrenti, Elisa. in prep. Existential Sentences and Definiteness Effects in Southern Calabrese. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hamburg.

Suñer, Margarita. 1982. Syntax and Semantics of Spanish Presentational Sentence Types. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. “The possessor that ran away from home”. The Linguistic Review 3: 89-102.

Torrego, Esther. 1998. The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Torrego, Esther. 1999. “El complemento directo preposicional”. In Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española Vol. 2: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Relationes temporales, aspectuales y modales, 1779-1805. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Tortora, Christina. 1997. The Syntax and Semantics of the Weak Locative. Ph.D. thesis, University of Delaware.

Tortora, Christina. 2001. “Evidence for a null locative in Italian”. In Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 313-326. Amsterdam, Elsevier.

Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. “Remarks on transitivity”. Journal of Linguistics 21: 386-396.

Uriagereka, Juan. 1998. “From being to having: Questions about ontology from a Kayne/Szabolcsi syntax”. In A. Schwegler, B. Tranel and M. Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives. Selected papers from the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXVII), Irvine, 20-22 February, 1997, 283-306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Villalba, Xavier. 2013. “Eventive existentials in Catalan and the Topic-Focus articulation”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25: 147-173.

von Heusinger, Klaus and Georg Kaiser. 2007. “Differential object marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish”. In G. Kaiser and M. Leonetti (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance languages”, 85-110. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Konstanzer Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft (No. 122).

Wagner, Max Leopold. 1960. Dizionario etimologico sardo (vol. 1). Heidelberg: Winter.

Waltereit, Richard and Ulrich Detges. 2008. “Syntactic change from within and from without syntax: A usage-based analysis”. In R. Waltereit and U. Detges (eds.), The Paradox of Grammatical Change: Perspectives from Romance, 13-30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ward, Gregory and Betty, Birner. 1995. “Definiteness and the English existential”. Language 71: 722-742.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Copyright (c) 2015 Silvio Cruschina