French subject doubling
A third path
Abstract
This paper revisits the status of subject clitics in Spoken French by studying subject doubling as a sociolinguistic variable. In the literature, two influential analyses have been proposed to account for French subject doubling. Based on new evidence from a corpus study on the large Multicultural Paris French (MPF) corpus, we argue for an analysis reconciling these two competing views of the construction in Spoken (colloquial) French. On one hand, we provide further support to the morphological approach (Auger, 1994; Culbertson, 2010) in which subject clitics are morphological agreement markers on the verb. On the other hand, we argue based on new evidence that lexical subjects are topicalized, as in the dislocation analysis. Furthermore, we argue that Spoken French is in a diglossia situation where speakers alternate structures provided by both Standard French and Colloquial French grammars. This paper provides further evidence of how quantitative studies of language use can shed light on long-standing theoretical debates.
Keywords
subject doubling, dislocation, null subject, Colloquial French, quantitative syntaxReferences
Adger, David. 2014. Variability and grammatical architecture. In C. Picallo (ed.), Linguistic variation in the minimalist framework, 179–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adger, David, & Jennifer Smith. 2010. Variation in agreement: A lexical feature-based approach. Lingua 120: 1109–1134.
Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane, & Rachel Nye. 2012a. Main Clause phenomena and the privilege of the root. In Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane, & Rachel Nye (eds), Main Clause phenomena: New horizons, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane, & Rachel Nye. 2012b. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Alemán Bañón, José, Fiorentino, Robert, & Alison Gabriele. 2012. The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research 1456: 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.057
Alexiadou, Artemis, & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(3): 491–539.
Auger, Julie. 1991. Variation and syntactic theory: Agreement-marking vs. Dislocation in Québec Colloquial French. NWAVE XX Meeting, Washington, DC.
Auger, Julie. 1993. More evidence for verbal agreement-marking in colloquial French. In W. J. Ashby, M. Mithun, & G. Perissinotto (eds), Linguistic Perspectives on Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the XXI Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Santa Barbara, February 21, 1991, 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.103.20aug
Auger, Julie. 1994. Pronominal Clitics in Québec Colloquial French: A Morphological Analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Auger, Julie. 1995. Les clitiques pronominaux en français parlé informel: une approche morphologique. Revue québécoise de linguistique 24(1): 21–60.
Auger, Julie. 1998. Le redoublement des sujets en français informel québécois: Une approche variationniste. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 43(1): 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100020429
Auger, Julie. 2003a. Le redoublement des sujets en picard. Journal of French Language Studies 13(3): 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269503001200
Auger, Julie. 2003b. Les pronoms clitiques sujets en picard: Une analyse au confluent de la phonologie, de la morphologie et de la syntaxe. Journal of French Language Studies 13(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269503001066
Auger, Julie, & Anne-José Villeneuve. 2010. La double expression des sujets en français saguenéen: Étude variationniste. In W. Remysen, & D. Vincent (eds), Hétérogénéité Et Homogénéité Dans Les Pratiques Langagieres: Mélanges Offerts à Denise Deshaies, 67–86. Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bettens, Olivier. 2023. Chantez-vous français? Retrieved on 2023-09-03 from https://virga.org/cvf/.
Bianchi, Valentina, & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is Topic a Root Phenomenon? IBERIA: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics. 2(1): 43–88.
Blondeau, Hélène, & Emmanuelle Labeau. 2016. La référence temporelle au futur dans les bulletins météo en France et au Québec: Regard variationniste sur l’oral préparé. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 61(3): 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2016.26
Brandi, Luciana, & Patrizia Cordin. 1989. Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter. In O. A. Jaeggli, & K. J. Safir (eds), The Null Subject Parameter, 111–142. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_4
Brunetti, Lisa, & Mathieu Avanzi. 2017. Discourse properties of French clitic left dislocated NPs and their effect on prosody. Ms. Université Paris Diderot/CNRS.
Brunetti, Lisa, Avanzi, Mathieu, & Cédric Gendrot. 2012. Entre syntaxe, prosodie et discours: les topiques sujets en français parlé. In F. Neveu, V. Muni Toke, P. Blumenthal, T. Klingler, P. Ligas, S. Prévost, & S. Teston-Bonnard (eds), SHS Web of Conferences, 3e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, Lyon, France, July 4-7, 2012, Vol 1: 2041–2054. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20120100209
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. 602–623. Malden, MA / London : John Wiley & Sons https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4490266
Campion, Elizabeth. 1984. Left dislocation in Montréal French. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. The Movement Nature of Left Dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 397-412.
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2001. On the status of subject clitics in Child French. Research on Child Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, 1314–1330. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Coveney, Aidan. 1996. Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Exeter, UK: Elm Bank.
Coveney, Aidan. 2005. Subject Doubling in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Approach. The French Review 79(1): 96–111.
Culbertson, Jennifer. 2010. Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86(1): 85–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0183
De Cat, Cécile. 2005. French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua 115(9): 1195–1219.
Engel, Dulcie. 1990. Tense and Text: A Study of French Past Tenses. London: Routledge.
Fawcett, Tom. 2006. Introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 27: 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
Fox, John, & Georges Monette. 1992. Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(417): 178–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290467
Frank, Austin, & Florian Jaeger. 2008. Speaking Rationally: Uniform Information Density as an Optimal Strategy for Language Production. The 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci08), 939–944.
Frascarelli, Mara, & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe, & S. Winkler (eds), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra
Gadet, Françoise (ed). 2017. Les parlers jeunes dans l’île-de-France multiculturelle. Paris: Ophrys.
Gadet, Françoise, & Emmanuelle Guerin. 2016. Construire un corpus pour des façons de parler non standard: Multicultural Paris French. Corpus. https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.3049
Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O'Neil (eds), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, 94–126. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Givón, Thomas. 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3
Grobol, Loïc, & Benoît Crabbé. 2021. Analyse en dépendances du français avec des plongements contextualisés (French dependency parsing with contextualized embeddings). Actes de la 28e Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles. Vol. 1: conférence principale, 106–114.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD, and the left periphery. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, & P. Portner (eds), Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture, 27–52. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
Hawkins, John. 2001. Why are categories adjacent? Journal of Linguistics 37(1): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670100860X
Hawkins, John. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hooper, Joan B., & Sandra A Thompson. 1973. On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.
Insee. 2003. Professions et Catégories Socioprofessionnelles. https://www.insee.fr/fr/metadonnees/pcs2003/categorieSocioprofessionnelleAgregee/1?champRecherche=true
Jaeger, Florian. 2010. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1): 23–62.
Jaeger, Florian. 2011. Corpus-based research on language production: Information density and reducible subject relatives. Language from a Cognitive Perspective: Grammar, Usage and Processing. Studies in Honor of Tom Wasow, 161–198. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication Stanford.
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168
Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In K. Beals (ed.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on Variation and Linguistic Theory. 180–201. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Levy, Roger, & Florian Jaeger. 2007. Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, & T. Hofmann (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference, 849–856. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Mandrekar, Jayawant N. 2010. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 5(9): 1315–1316.
Manzini, M. Rita, & Leonardo Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
Massot, Benjamin. 2010. Le patron diglossique de variation grammaticale en français. Langue française 168(4): 87–106. https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.168.0087
Massot, Benjamin, & Paul Rowlett. 2013. Le débat sur la diglossie en France: Aspects scientifiques et politiques. Journal of French Language Studies 23(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269512000336
Meister, Clara, Pimentel, Tiago, Haller, Patrick, Jäger, Lena, Cotterell, Ryan, & Roger Levy. 2021. Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesis. arXiv:2109.11635 [Cs]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11635
Nadasdi, Terry. 1995. Subject NP doubling, matching, and minority French. Language Variation and Change 7(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000879
Olarrea, Antxon. 1998. On the Position of Subjects in Spanish. ASjU 32(1) : 47–108.
Pabst, Katharina, Konnelly, Lex, Wilson, Fiona, & Naomi Nagy. 2020. Variation in subject doubling in Homeland and Heritage Faetar. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 42: 1-15.
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The higher functional field: Evidence from northern Italian dialects. Oxford University Press.
Poplack, Shana. 2001. Variability, frequency, and productivity in the irrealis domain of French. In J. Bybee, & P. Hopper (eds), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, Vol. 45, 405–428. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poplack, Shana, Lealess, Allison, & Nathalie Dion. 2013. The evolving grammar of the French subjunctive. Probus 25(1): 139–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0005
Qi, Peng, Zhang, Yuhao, Zhang, Yuhui, Bolton, Jason, & Christopher Manning. 2020. Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages. arXiv:2003.07082 [Cs]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07082
R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Riou, Étienne, & Barbara Hemforth. 2015. Dislocation clitique de l’objet à gauche en français écrit. Discours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique. A journal of linguistics, psycholinguistics and computational linguistics 16. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.9037
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–557. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178501
Roberge, Yves. 1990. Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7znfn
Roberts, Nicholas. 2014. A sociolinguistic study of grammatical variation in Martinique French. Ph.D. thesis, Newcastle University.
Rowlett, Paul. 1998. Sentential Negation in French. Oxford University Press.
Sankoff, Gillian. 1982. Usage linguistique et grammaticalisation: Les clitiques sujets en français. La Sociolinguistique Dans Les Pays de Langue Romane, 81–85. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Schäfer, Lisa, Lemke, Robin, Drenhaus, Heiner, & Ingo Reich. 2021. The Role of UID for the Usage of Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Psycholinguistic Evidence From Length and Context Effects. Frontiers in Psychology 12 : article 661087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661087
Shannon, Claude E. 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27(3): 379–423.
Simonenko, Alexandra, Crabbé, Benoit, & Sophie Prévost. 2019. Agreement syncretization and the loss of null subjects: Quantificational models for Medieval French. Language Variation and Change 31(3): 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394519000188
Taraldsen, Tarald. 1978. On the NIC, vacuous application and the that-trace filter. Ms. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
Thoms, Gary, Adger, David, Heycock, Caroline, & Jennifer Smith. 2019. Syntactic variation and auxiliary contraction: The surprising case of Scots. Language 95(3) : 421–455.
Tristram, Anna. 2020. Variation and change in future temporal reference with avoir and être. Journal of French Language Studies 31(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269520000174
Zahler, Sara. 2014. Variable subject doubling in spoken Parisian French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1): 360–371.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2011. Pour un modèle diglossique de description du français: Quelques implications théoriques, didactiques et méthodologiques. Journal of French Language Studies 21(2): 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269510000323
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2013. De la notion de grammaire standard dans une optique diglossique du français. Journal of French Language Studies 23(1): 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269512000361
Zwicky, Arnold, & Geoffrey Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n’t. Language 59(3): 502–513.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2024 Yiming Liang, Caterina Donati, Heather Burnett
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
