Prosody and focus recognition in Spanish

A fresh look at the Focus Prominence Rule

Authors

Abstract

At the interface between information structure and prosody, discourse-pragmatic categories are mapped onto prosodic structures and vice versa. The Focus Prominence Rule (FPR), which stipulates that the nuclear stress must fall within the focus domain, is considered one of the cross-linguistically most stable principles governing this mapping. However, FPR violations have received only little attention. To determine whether they occur during production or perception, we combine (i) the results of an earlier perception experiment on Argentinean Spanish showing that in about 30% of the stimuli the focus was not duly recognized and (ii) a detailed prosodic analysis of 30 lexically identical [S]-FV-dO-iO stimuli used in that study. The following parameters are considered: first, voice quality in terms of the degree of post-focal devoicing; second, the alignment of the focal pitch accent’s high target (H) and the following low target (L), the scaling of H, and the steepness of the subsequent fall; third, the duration of the stressed syllable of the focused XP in relation to the following stressed syllable. A Relative Weight Analysis shows that duration and alignment account for 80% of variability in accuracy rate, speaking in favor of the assumption that FPR violations mainly occur in production.

Keywords

Focus Prominence Rule, prosody, focus, Spanish, production vs. perception

References

Beckman, Mary, Díaz-Campos, Manuel, McGory, Julia Tevis, & Morgan, Terrell, A. 2002. Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework. Probus 14: 9-36. DOI: 10.1515/prbs.2002.008

Boersma, Paul, & Hayes, David. 2021. Praat. Doing phonetics by computer 6.1.47. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ (accessed: July 24, 2024).

Borràs-Comes, Joan, Vanrell, Maria del Mar, & Prieto, Pilar. 2014. The role of pitch range in establishing intonational contrasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44(1): 1-20. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100313000303

Bosque, Ignacio, & Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2009. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.

Breen, Mara, Fedorenko, Evelina, Wagner, Michael, & Gibson, Edward. 2010. Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 25: 1044-1098. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.504378

Büring, Daniel. 2009. Towards a typology of focus realization. In M. Zimmermann, & C. Féry (eds). Information structure, 177-205. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0008

Calhoun, Sasha, La Cruz, Erwin, & Olssen, Anna. 2018. The interplay of information structure, semantics, prosody, and word ordering in Spanish intransitives. Laboratory Phonology 9(1): 8, 1-30. DOI: 10.5334/labphon.65

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (ed). Subject and topic, 25-55. New York: Academic Press.

Dufter, Andreas, & Gabriel, Christoph. 2016. Information structure, prosody, and word order. In S. Fischer, & C. Gabriel (eds). Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance, 419-455. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110311860-017

El Zarka, Dina, & Hödl, Petra. 2021. A study on the perception of prosodic cues to focus by Egyptian listeners. Some make use of them, but most of them don’t. Speech Communication 132: 55-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2021.05.002

Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2011. Verum focus y prosodia: cuando la duración (sí que) importa. Oralia 14: 181-201. DOI: 10.25115/oralia.v14i.8186

Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva. 2010. The role of duration in intonational modelling: a com-parative study of Peninsular and Argentinean Spanish. Revista española de lingüísti-ca aplicada 23: 153-174.

Face, Timothy. 2002a. Focus and early peak alignment in Spanish intonation. Probus 13: 223-246. DOI: 10.1515/prbs.2001.004

Face, Timothy. L. 2002b. Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Span-ish. Munich: Lincom Europa.

Feldhausen, Ingo, Pešková, Andrea, Kireva, Elena, & Gabriel, Christoph. 2011. Cat-egorical perception of Porteño nuclear accents. In W.-S. Lee, & E. Zee (eds). Pro-ceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2011, 116-119. Hong Kong, China.

https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/

ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/SpecialSession/Session4/Feldhausen/Feldhausen.pdf

Feldhausen, Ingo, & Vanrell, Maria del Mar. 2015. Oraciones hendidas y marcación del foco estrecho en español. Una aproximación desde la Teoría de la Optimidad Es-tocástica. Revista internacional de lingüística iberoamericana 26: 39-60. DOI: 10.31819/rili-2015-132604

Féry, Caroline. 2013. Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 683-734. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-013-9195-7

Fox, John, & Weisberg, Sanford. 2019. An R companion to applied regression. Third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gabriel, Christoph. 2010. On focus, prosody, and word order in Argentinean Span-ish: A minimalist OT account. Revista virtual de estudos da linguagem 4: 183-222. http://

www.revel.inf.br/files/artigos/revel_special_4_on_focus_prosody_and_word_order.pdf (accessed: July 24, 2024).

Gabriel, Christoph. 2021. La prosodia de las variedades americanas. In Eckkrammer, E. M. (ed). Manual del español en América, 465-487. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110334845-028

Gabriel, Christoph, Feldhausen, Ingo, Pešková, Andrea, Colantoni, Laura, Lee, Su-Ar, Arana, Valeria, & Labastía, Leopoldo. 2010. Argentinian Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto, & P. Roseano (eds). Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language, 285-317. München: Lincom.

Gabriel, Christoph, & Kireva, Elena. 2014. Prosodic transfer in learner and contact varieties. Speech rhythm and intonation of Buenos Aires Spanish and L2 Castilian Spanish produced by Italian native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36: 257-281. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263113000740

Gabriel, Christoph, & Heidinger, Steffen. 2022. The focus prominence rule in Span-ish from a perception perspective. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 11, 141–172. DOI: 10.7557/1.11.1.6483

Gili-Fivela, Barbara. 2009. From production to perception and back. An analysis of two pitch accents. In S. Fuchs, H. Loevenbruck, D. Pape, & P. Perrier (eds). Some aspects of speech and the brain, 363-405. Frankfurt: Lang.

Heidinger, Steffen. 2015. Optionality and preferences in Spanish postverbal constitu-ent order: An OT account without basic constituent order. Lingua 162: 102-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.003

Heidinger, Steffen. 2016. El orden de los constituyentes posverbales y la expresión del foco informativo en español. In A. Ledgeway, M. Cennamo, & G. Mensching (eds), Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie ro-manes (Nancy, 15-20 juillet 2013). Section 4: Syntaxe, 217-232. Nancy: ATILF.

Heidinger, Steffen. 2018. Sekundäre Prädikation und Informationsstruktur: Fokus und Informationsstatus bei spanischen Depiktiven. Frankfurt: Lang. DOI: 10.3726/

b14723

Höhle, Tilman N. 1982. Explikationen für “normale Betonung” und “normale Wort-stellung”. In W. Abraham (ed), Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntakti-schen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, 75-154. Tübingen: Narr.

Hoot, Bradley. 2012. Presentational focus in heritage and monolingual Spanish. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago: Chicago. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED552262 (accessed: July 24, 2024).

Hoot, Bradley. 2016. Narrow presentational focus in Mexican Spanish. Experimental evidence. Probus 28: 335-365. DOI: 10.1515/probus-2014-0004

Hoot, Bradley. 2017. Narrow presentational focus in heritage Spanish and the syntax-discourse interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7: 63–95. DOI: 10.1075/

lab.14021.hoo

Hualde, José Ignacio. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge Universi-ty Press.

Hualde, José Ignacio, & Prieto, Pilar. 2015. Intonational variation in Spanish. Euro-pean and American varieties. In S. Frota, & P. Prieto (eds), Intonation in Romance, 350-391. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780199685332.003.0010

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Johnson, JW. 2000. A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in Multiple Regression. Multivariate behavioral research 35: 1-19. DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1

Krüger, Martina. 2009. Produktion und Perzeption von Fokus im Deutschen. MA thesis, Köln: Universität zu Köln.

Lang-Rigal, Jenifer. 2011. Perception of narrow focus prosody in Buenos Aires Spa-nish. In S. M. Alvord (ed). Selected proceedings of the 5th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology, 118-126. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

Matić, Dejan, & Wedgwood, Daniel. 2013. The meanings of focus. The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 49: 127-163. DOI:10.1017/S0022226712000345

Olarrea, Antxon. 2012. Word order and information structure. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea, & E. O’Rourke (eds). The handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 603-627. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118228098.ch28

Prieto, Pilar, Vanrell, Maria del Mar, Astruc, Llüísa, Payne, Elinor, Post, Brechtje. 2012. Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication 54: 681-702. DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2011.12.001

Prieto, Pilar, & Roseano, Paolo (eds). 2009-2010. Atlas interactivo de la entonación del español. Barcelona: Grup d’estudis de prosòdia. https://prosodia.upf.edu/ atlasentonacion/ (accessed: July 24, 2024).

Prince, Alan, & Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory. Constraint interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9780470759400

Rialland, Anne, & Robert, Stéphane. 2001. The intonational system of Wolof. Lin-guistics 39: 893-939. DOI: 10.1515/ling.2001.038

Roessig, Simon. 2021. Categoriality and continuity in prosodic prominence. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4121875

Roettger, Timo B., Mahrt, Tim, & Cole, Jennifer. 2019. Mapping prosody onto meaning – the case of information structure in American English. Language, Cogni-tion and Neuroscience 34: 841-860. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1587482

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2005. Prosody-syntax interaction in the expression of focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 687-755. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-004-2874-7

Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2016. Constraint conflict and information structure. In C. Féry, & S. Ishihara (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, 203-223. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.27

Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax. The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sluijter, Agaath M. C., & van Heuven, Vincent J. 1996. Spectral balance as an acous-tic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 2471-2485. DOI: 10.1121/1.417955

Sorace, Antonella. 2012. Pinning down the concept of interface in bilingual devel-opment. A reply to peer commentaries. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2: 209-216. DOI: 10.1075/lab.2.2.04sor

Toledo, Guillermo Andrés. 1989. Señales prosódicas del foco. Revista argentina de lingüística 5: 205-230.

Tonidandel, Scott, & LeBreton, James M. no date. Relative importance analysis: pro-grams for calculating relative weights in multiple, multivariate and logistic regression (web application). https://rwa-web.shinyapps.io/multipleregression/ (accessed: July 24, 2024).

Tonidandel, Scott, Lebreton, James M., & Johnson, Jeff W. 2009. Determining the statistical significance of relative weights. Psychological methods 14: 387-399. DOI: 10.1037/a0017735

Vallduví, Enric. 1990. The informational component. PhD thesis, Philadelphia: Uni-versity of Pennsylvania. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/76379509.pdf (accessed: July 24, 2024).

Vallduví, Enric, & Engdahl, Elisabet. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459-519. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459

Vanrell, Maria del Mar, Stella, Antonio, Gili-Fivela, Barbara, & Prieto, Pilar. 2013. Prosodic manifestations of the Effort Code in Catalan, Italian and Spanish contrastive focus. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43: 195-220. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100313000066

Terán, Virginia, & Ortega-Llebaria, Marta. 2017. A description of Tucumán Spanish intonation in Argentina. Open Linguistics 3, 456-490. DOI: 0.1515/opli-2017-0023

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological phrases. Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. PhD thesis, Cambridge, MA: MIT. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/truckenbrodt95.pdf (accessed: July 24, 2024).

Yanushevskaya, Irena, Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe, & Gobl, Christer. 2016. The interaction of long-term voice quality with the realisation of focus. In J. Barnes, A. Brugos, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, & N. Veilleux (eds), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016, 390-394. Boston. DOI: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-191

Zerbian, Sabine. 2006. Expression of information structure in the Bantu language Northern Sotho. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprach-typologie und Universalienforschung. DOI: 10.21248/zaspil.45.2006.331

Zimmermann, Malte, & Onea, Edgar. 2011. Focus marking and focus interpretation. Lingua 121: 1651-1670. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.002

Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1999. Las funciones informativas. Tema y foco. In I. Bos-que, & V. Demonte (eds). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Tomo 3, 4215-4244. Madrid: Espasa.

Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 2016. Nuclear stress and information structure. In C. Féry, & S. Ishihara (eds), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 165-184. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.008

Published

2025-02-19

Downloads