Passivization and pseudo-relatives with perception verbs in Spanish

Authors

  • Fernando Martín Carranza Conicet
  • Pablo Zdrojewski University of Buenos Aires

Abstract

Perception verbs in Spanish (e.g. ver, ‘to see’; oír, ‘to hear’) can combine simultaneously with a direct object and different kinds of clausal modifiers. One of these are pseudo-relative clauses (e.g. que se caía, ‘that he fell’, in Ana vio a Juan que se caía, literally ‘Ana saw John that he fell’, with the meaning of ‘Ana saw John falling’). If the verb combines with a pseudo-relative, its passivization is no longer possible (*Juan fue visto que se caía, literally John was seen that he fell). In this paper, we contend that this pattern is due to an obviation effect. This explains not only the behavior of these verbs regarding passivization, but also the fact that reflexive and passive se with pseudo-relatives also leads to ungrammatical results. We conjecture that this obviation effect may be related to a defectiveness of the embedded complementizer. We draw a possible analysis for this behavior in terms of an anti-logophoric operator in the periphery of the pseudo-relative.

Keywords

embedding, perception verbs, obviation, Spanish

References

We presented previous versions of this paper in the XVII Meeting of SAEL and in the workshop “Romance Languages: Recent Contributions to Linguistic Theory”. We are very thankful to the audience of those meetings and, especially to Roberta Pires de Oliveira and Cilene Rodrigues, who invited us to contribute to this dossier. We also express our gratitude to José Camacho and Andrés Saab for reading a draft, to Romina Trebisaccce, Matías Verdecchia and Andrea Bohrn for helping us with data and judgments and to Rocío Maure for helping us improve our writing. As usual, all errors and omissions are ours.

References

Aldama García, Nuria. 2018. The object-gap pseudorelative generalization. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 7: 169-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/1.7.1.4405

Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts. 1988. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2): 219-251.

Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On Finiteness as Logophoric Anchoring. In J. Guéron & L. Tasmowski (eds.), Temps et Point de Vue / Tense and Point of View, 213-246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.

Bordelois, Ivonne. 1974. The grammar of Spanish causative complements. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Brucart, José M. 1999. La estructura del sintagma nominal: las oraciones de relativo, in I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 395-522. Madrid, Espasa Calpe.

Camacho, José. 2011. Sobre la naturaleza del sujeto nulo en el complemento de verbos de percepción. Cuadernos de la ALFAL 3: 11-29.

Campos, Héctor. 1994. Pseudo-elevación y pseudo-relativas. In V. Demonte (ed.), Gramática del español, 201-236. México: El colegio de México.

Carrasco Gutiérrez, Ángeles. 1999. El tiempo verbal y la sintaxis oracional. La consecutio temporum. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 3061-3128. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Casalicchio, Jan. 2013. Pseudorrelative, gerundi e infiniti nelle varietà romanze: afiinità solo superficiale e corrispondenze strutturali. Ph.D. thesis, Padova: Università degli Studi di Padova.

Casalicchio, Jan & Peter Herbeck. 2022. Pseudo-relative clauses, infinitives and gerunds with Spanish perception verbs: A comparative view. Ms., lingbuzz/006720.

Castillo Ros, Lorena. 2017. A Note on an ECM asymmetry in Spanish, Isogloss 3: 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.67

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1992. The pseudo-relative and acc-ing constructions after verbs of perception, Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 1–31.

Costantini, Francesco. 2009. Interface Perspectives on Clausal Complementation. The Case of Subjunctive Obviation. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.

Costantini, Francesco. 2023. On some epistemic access effects. In J. Goncharov & H. Zeijlstra (eds). Agency and Intentions in Language, 27-53. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

Di Tullio, Ángela. 1998. Complementos no flexivos de verbos de percepción física en español. Verba 25: 197–221.

Di Tullio, Ángela, Saab, Andrés & Pablo Zdrojewski. 2019. Clitic Doubling in a Doubling World: The Case of Argentinean Spanish Reconsidered. In A. J. Gallego (ed.), The Syntactic Variation of Spanish Dialects, 215-244. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634797.003.0008,

Dubinsky, Stanley & Robert Hamilton. 1998. Epithets as antilogophoric pronouns”. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 685-693.

Farkas, Donka F. 1988. On obligatory control. Linguistics and philosophy 11(1): 27-58.

Farkas, Donka F. 1992. On obviation. In I. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (eds.). Lexical matters, 85-109. Stanford University: CSLI.

Gili Gaya, Samuel. 1961. Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibliograf.

Higginbotham, James. 1983. The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. The Journal of Philosophy 80: 100–127.

Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63-99.

Kempchinsky, Paula. 1985. The subjunctive disjoint reference Effect. In C. Neidle & R. Nuñez Cedeño (eds.). Studies in Romance Linguistics, 123-140. Dordrecht: Foris.

Kempchinsky, Paula. 1986. Romance subjunctive clauses and logical form. Phd Dissertation, Los Angeles: UCLA.

Kempchinsky, Paula. 2009. What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119(12): 1788–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.009.

Link, Godehard. 1998. Hydras: on the logic of relative clause constructions with multiple heads. In G. Link, Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy, 77-88. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. “Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas”. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1575-1629. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Moulton, Keir, & Nino Grillo. 2015. Pseudo Relatives: big and direct. In T. Bui & D. Ozyildiz, (eds.) NELS 45: Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 193-202. Amherst: GLSA (Graduate Linguistics Student Association).

Picallo, Maria del Carmen. 1984. The Infl Node and the Null Subject Parameter. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(1): 75-102.

Picallo, Maria del Carmen. 1985. Opaque domains. Ph.D. thesis, New York: CUNY.

Postal, Paul. 1986. Studies of passive clauses. New York: State of New York University Press.

Pujalte, Mercedes and Andrés Saab. 2012. Syncretism as PF-repair: The case of se-insertion in Spanish. In M. C. Cuervo y Y. Roberge (eds), The end of argument structure?, 229–260. Bingley: Emerald. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9781780523774_011

RAE & ASALE. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Espasa.

Rafel, Joan. 2000. From complementizer to preposition: Evidence from romance, Probus 12: 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2000.12.1.67

Raposo, Eduardo. 1985. Some Asymmetries in the Binding Theory in Romance”. The Linguistic Review 5: 75-110.

Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In G. Cinque & G. Salvi, Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287-296. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473949_016

Saab, Andrés & Pablo Zdrojewski. 2021. On the Nonexistence of Asymmetric DOM in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 52(4): 852–866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00389

Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. The Lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive (speculations on reference to worlds, presuppositions, and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood). In T. Geerts, I. van Ginneken & H. Jacobs (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 269-309. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino. 2023. Restrictions on Long Passives in English and Brazilian Portuguese: A Phase-Based Account. Linguistic Inquiry 54:1, 1-35;doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00482

Stegovec, Adrian. 2019. Perspectival control and obviation in directive clauses, Natural Language Semantics 27: 47–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-019-09150-x

Suñer, Margarita. 1984. Controlled pro. In P. Baldi (ed.), Linguistic Symposium of Romance Languages 12, 253–273.

Suñer, Margarita. 1986. On the referential properties of embedded finite clause subjects”. In I. Bordelois, H. Contreras & K. Zagona. Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, 183-196. Dordrecht: Foris.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 2021. Obviation in Hungarian: what is its scope, and is it due to competition? Glossa 6: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1421

Published

2023-12-15

Downloads