On Brazilian Portuguese 3rd person object full pronouns

Authors

Abstract

It has been observed that certain overt 3rd person object pronouns, such as ‘it’ in paycheck sentences, propositional clitics in Portuguese and English, 3rd person non-propositional clitics in Catalan, Spanish, Slovenian and Serbian/Croatian may allow sloppy readings. Additionally, it is well-known that Brazilian Portuguese (BP) has lost 3rd person object clitics, which were replaced either by [-animate] null objects or by [± animate] full pronouns. The latter, differently from personal 3rd person clitics in certain languages, do not allow strict/sloppy readings, regardless of their animacy feature specification. Nevertheless, animacy is relevant for the use of 3rd person object full pronouns in BP since only the [+animate] ones can be focused. I propose that the BP does not fit in the tripartite division of pronouns into ‘strong/weak/clitic’. I assume that full pronouns in Romance underwent a reanalysis from demonstratives, and that BP full pronouns have a structure that precludes them from licensing strict/sloppy readings. As for the animacy distinction in focalization contexts, I assume that [+animate] full pronouns in BP are specified for [Person] and must move out of VP to check that feature. Thus, they escape the relevant vP phase and become available for checking [focus] by a low Focus head.

Keywords

object full pronouns, animacy, strict/sloppy readings, DOM movement, Brazilian Portuguese

References

Baker, Mark C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP: the cartography of syntactic structures, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bliss, Heather. 2010. Argument structure, applicatives and animacy in Blackfoot. In H. Bliss & T. Girard (eds), Proceedings of WSCLA 13 & 14: Workshop on the structure and constituency of languages of the Americas. UBC Working Papers in Linguistics 26, 58–69. Vancouver: UBC Department of Linguistics.

Bosković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: on the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00148

Bosković, Željko 2016. What is sent to Spell-out is phases, not phasal complements. Current Trends in Generative Linguistics 56(1): 25–66. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.56.1.25-66

Bosković, Željko. 2018. On pronouns, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: argument ellipsis as predicate ellipsis. English Linguistics 35(1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj.35.1_1

Cardinaletti, Anna & Michael Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case of study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, 145–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804010.145

Carnie, Andrew. 2005. A phase-geometric approach to multiple marking systems. In M. McGinnis & N. Richards (eds), Perspectives on phases. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49: 87–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.

Cépeda, Paola & Sonia Cyrino. 2020. Putting objects in order: Asymmetrical relations in Spanish and Portuguese ditransitives. In A. Pineda & J. Mateu (eds), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond, 97–116. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3776538

Cerqueira, Fernanda. 2015. A sintaxe do pronome acusativo de terceira pessoa no português brasileiro. M.A. thesis, Federal University of Bahia (Universidade Federal da Bahia).

Cerqueira, Fernanda. 2019. O pronome pleno de terceira pessoa: estrutura interna e relações referenciais. Ph.D. thesis, Federal University of Bahia (Universidade Federal da Bahia).

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. The syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts.

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In R.E.A. Martin (ed.). Step by step. Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004

Cyrino, Sonia. 1994/1997. O objeto nulo no português brasileiro: um estudo sintático‐diacrônico. Ph.D. thesis, University of Campinas (Universidade Estadual de Campinas). Available at:

http://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/bitstream/REPOSIP/270355/1/Cyrino_SoniaMariaLazzarini_D.pdf

Cyrino, Sonia. 2010. On complex predicates in Brazilian Portuguese. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 1–21. Available at: https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/iberia/article/view/96

Cyrino, Sonia. 2012. Mudança sintática no português brasileiro: a perda de predicados complexos. In T. Lobo, Z. Carneiro, J. Soledade, A. Almeida & S. Ribeiro (eds), Rosae: linguística histórica, história das línguas e outras histórias, 137–159. Salvador: Edufba.

Cyrino, Sonia. 2016. Animacy and null objects in Brazilian Portuguese. Paper presented at the Colloquium Series, Department of Linguistics, Stony Brook University, 26 February 2016.

Cyrino, Sonia. 2018. O objeto nulo. In S. Cyrino & M.A. Torres Morais (eds), Mudança sintática do português brasileiro: perspectiva gerativista, 210–251. São Paulo: Contexto.

Cyrino, Sonia. 2019. Null objects/full pronouns and topicality in Brazilian Portuguese. Forum Linguístico 16(1): 3482–3498. https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2019v16n1p3482

Cyrino, Sonia. 2021a. On the non-homegenity of null object constructions. Talk presented at the CLT-Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona.

Cyrino, Sonia. 2021b. Brazilian Portuguese null objects and Spanish differential object marking. In A. Bárány, T. Biberauer, J. Douglas & S. Vikner (eds), Syntactic architecture and its consequences III: Inside syntax, 399–427. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4680330

Cyrino, Sonia & Monica-Alexandrina Irimia. 2019. Differential Object Marking in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista Letras UFPR 99: 177–201. Available at https://revistas.ufpr.br/letras/article/view/65275

Cyrino, Sonia & Monica-Alexandrina Irimia. To appear. Differential object marking in Brazilian Portuguese. In A. Mardale & M-A. Irimia (eds), Differential Object Marking in Romance: Towards microvariation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cyrino, Sonia & Ruth Lopes. 2016. Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. The Linguistic Review 33(4): 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2016-0012

Cyrino, Sonia & Gabriela Matos. 2016. Null objects and VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese. In W. L. Wetzels, J. Costa & S. Menuzzi (eds), Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, 294–317. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118791844.ch16

Cyrino, Sonia & Francisco Ordoñez. 2018. Null objects in Brazilian Portuguese and DOM in Spanish: similarities and differences. In T. Parodi (ed.), Proceedings of the VIII Nereus International Workshop “Referential Properties of the Romance DP in the Context of Multilingualism”, 103–120. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz (Arbeitspapier 129).

Demuth, Katherine, Machobane, Malillo, Moloi, Francina & Christopher Odato. 2005. Learning animacy hierarchy effects in Sesotho double object applicatives. Language 81(2): 421–447. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4489898

Duarte, Maria Eugenia. 1986. Variação e sintaxe: Clítico acusativo, pronome lexical e categoria vazia no português do brasil. Master’s thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica.

Duarte, Maria Eugenia. 1995. A perda do princípio ‘Evite Pronome’ no português brasileiro. Ph.D. thesis, University of Campinas.

Duarte, Maria Eugenia, Marques de Sousa, Antonio & Mariana Cardoso. 2021. A redução no quadro de clíticos de terceira pessoa no português brasileiro: um estudo diacrônico. Labor Histórico 7: 154–187. https://doi.org/10.24206/lh.v7iespec.44191

Fábregas, Antonio. 2013. Differential object marking in Spanish: state of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(2): 1–80. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2603

Hualde, Jose Ignacio. 1989. Double object constructions in KiRimi. In P. Newman & R. D. Botne (eds), Current approaches to African linguistics 5, 179–190. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112420089-014

Galves, Charlotte. 2001. Ensaios sobre as gramáticas do português. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.

Gardent, Claire. 1997. Sloopy identity. In C. Retoré (ed.), Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1328, 188–207. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052158

Giusti, Giuliana. 2001. The birth of a functional category: From Latin ILLE to the Romance Article and Personal Pronoun. In G. Cinque & G. Salvi (eds), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 157–171. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473949_010

Giusti, Giuliana. 2015. Nominal syntax at the interfaces: a comparative analysis

of languages with articles. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Guasti, Maria-Teresa. 2006. Analytic Causatives. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 142–172. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch6

Irimia, Monica-Alexandrina & Sonia Cyrino. 2017. Manifestations of differential object marking: from Brazilian Portuguese to prepositional accusatives. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 62(4), 411–426.

Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel. 2009. The low periphery of double object constructions in English and Spanish. Philologia Hispalensis 23: 179–200.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1969. Pronouns and Variables. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 108–116. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.

Lacerda, Renato 2015. Topicalization and the syntax-semantics interface: Asymmetries between high and low topics in Brazilian Portuguese. Paper presented at the Going Romance 29 – Nijmegen – Dec 10, 2015.

Lacerda, Renato. 2020. Middle-field syntax and information structure in Brazilian Portuguese. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.

Levin, Beth. 2008. Dative verbs: A crosslinguistic perspective. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 31(2): 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.31.2.12lev

López, Luiz. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions, and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9165.001.0001

MacDonald, Jonathan E. 2008. The syntactic nature of inner aspect: A minimalist perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.133

Magro, Catarina. 2021. Redobro de clítico em português europeu. Estudos de Lingüística Galega 11: 29–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/elg.11.5054

Manzini, M. Rita. 2014. Grammatical categories: strong and weak pronouns in Romance. Lingua 150: 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.001

Marques de Sousa, Antonio. 2017. As realizações do acusativo anafórico no português europeu e brasileiro: um estudo diacrônico. M.A. thesis, Federal University of Rio de Janiero (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro).

Martins, Ana Maria. 2004. Aspects of infinitival constructions in the history of Portuguese. In R. S. Gess & D. Arteaga (eds), Historical Romance Linguistics: Retrospective and Perspectives, 327¬–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.274.20mar

Mioto, Carlos. 2003. Focalização e quantificação. Revista Letras UFPR 61: 169–189. https://doi.org/10.5380/rel.v61i0.2886

Ordoñez, Francisco & Francesc Roca. 2019. Differential Object Marking (DOM) and clitic subspecification in Catalonian Spanish. In A. Gallego (ed.), The Syntactic Variation of Spanish Dialects, 35–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634797.003.0002

Ormazabal, Juan & Juan Romero. 2007. The object agreement constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25: 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9010-9

Ormazabal, Juan & Juan Romero. 2013. Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus 25(2): 301–344. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0012

Quer, Josep & Joanna Rosselló. 2013. On sloppy readings, ellipsis and pronouns – missing arguments in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) and other argument-drop languages. In V. Camacho-Taboada, Á. L. Jiménez-Fernández & M. Reyes-Tejedor (eds), Information structure and agreement, 337–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.197.13que

Renzi, Lorenzo. 1997. Fissione di lat. ILLE nelle lingue romanze. In G. Holtus, J. Kramer & W. Schweickard (eds), Italica et Romanica: Festschrift für Max Pfister zum 65. Geburtstag, 7–18. Berlin, Boston: Max Niemeyer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110963311.501 [2012]

Rodriguez-Moñdonedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: agree and Differential Object Marking. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.

Richards, Mark D. 2008. Defective agree, case alternations and the prominence of person. In I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, A. Malchukov & M. D. Richards (eds), Scales and Hierarchies: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, 173–196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110344134.173

Roca, Francesc. 1992. Object clitics in Spanish and Catalan, Master thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Ruas, Samara & Francisco Ordoñez. 2021. Clíticos, DOM y elipsis. Estudio comparativo experimental del español de Buenos Aires, Ciudad de México y Madrid.

Talk presented at ALFAL-2021, Romania Nova.

Runić, Jelena. 2014. A new look at argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.

Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino. 2018. Why do some ECM verbs resist passivisation? A phase-based explanation. In S. Hucklebridge & M. Nelson (eds), Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 48) 3: 81–90.

Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino. 2022. Restrictions on Long Passives in English and Brazilian Portuguese: A Phase-Based Account. Linguistic Inquiry 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00482

Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependency of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Travis, Lisa. 2010. Inner Aspect: The Articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer.

Uriagereka, Juan. 1996. Determiner clitic placement. In R. Freidin (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar, 257–295. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_13

Woolford, Ellen. 2000. Agreement in disguise. In V. Carstens & F. Parkinson (eds), Advances in African linguistics, 103–117. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.

Zulaica Hernandez, Iker. 2018. A denotation-driven reanalysis of the Spanish neuter pronominal system. Lingua 213: 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.07.003

Published

2023-11-14

Downloads